OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 18, Iss. 9 — Sep. 1, 2001
  • pp: 2282–2296

Pursuit eye movements to second-order motion targets

Michael J. Hawken and Karl R. Gegenfurtner  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 18, Issue 9, pp. 2282-2296 (2001)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.18.002282


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (656 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We studied smooth-pursuit eye movements elicited by first- and second-order motion stimuli. Stimuli were random dot fields whose contrast was modulated by a Gaussian window with a space constant of 0.5°. For the first-order stimuli, the random dots simply moved across the screen at the same speed as the window; for the second-order stimuli the window moved across stationary or randomly flickering dots. Additional stimuli which combined first- and second-order motion cues were used to determine the degree and type of interaction found between the two types of motion stimuli. Measurements were made at slow (1°/s) and moderate (6°/s) target speeds. At a velocity of 1°/s the initiation, transition, and steady-state phases of smooth pursuit in response to second-order motion targets are severely affected when compared with the smooth pursuit of first-order motion targets. At a velocity of 6°/s there is a small but significant deficit in steady-state pursuit of second-order motion targets but not much effect on pursuit initiation.

© 2001 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.2210) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision - eye movements
(330.4150) Vision, color, and visual optics : Motion detection
(330.5510) Vision, color, and visual optics : Psychophysics

Citation
Michael J. Hawken and Karl R. Gegenfurtner, "Pursuit eye movements to second-order motion targets," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 2282-2296 (2001)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-18-9-2282


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. M. R. Dursteler, R. H. Wurtz, and W. T. Newsome, “Directional pursuit deficits following lesions of the foveal representation of the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque monkey,” J. Neurophysiol. 57, 1262–1287 (1987).
  2. M. R. Dursteler and R. H. Wurtz, “Pursuit and optokinetic deficits following chemical lesions of cortical areas MT and MST,” J. Neurophysiol. 60, 950–965 (1988).
  3. J. C. Lynch, “Frontal eye field lesions in monkeys disrupt visual pursuit,” Exp. Brain Res. 68, 437–441 (1987).
  4. E. G. Keating, “Frontal eye field lesions impair predictive and visually guided pursuit eye movements,” Exp. Brain Res. 86, 311–323 (1991).
  5. J. P. Gottlieb, M. G. MacAvoy, and C. J. Bruce, “Neural responses related to smooth-pursuit eye movements and their correspondence with electrically elicited smooth eye movements in the primate frontal eye field,” J. Neurophysiol. 72, 1634–1653 (1994).
  6. S. J. Heinen, “Single neuron activity in the dorsomedial frontal cortex during smooth pursuit eye movements,” Exp. Brain Res. 104, 357–361 (1995).
  7. S. J. Heinen and M. Liu, “Single-neuron activity in the dorsomedial frontal cortex during smooth-pursuit eye movements to predictable target motion,” Visual Neurosci. 14, 853–865 (1997).
  8. S. Heywood and J. Churcher, “Eye movements and the after-image—I. Tracking the after-image,” Vision Res. 11, 1163–1167 (1971).
  9. S. Yasui and L. R. Young, “Perceived visual motion as effective stimulus to pursuit eye movement system,” Science 190, 906–908 (1975).
  10. M. Steinbach, “Pursuing the perceptual rather than the retinal stimulus,” Vision Res. 16, 1371–1376 (1976).
  11. M. J. Morgan and D. F. Turnbull, “Smooth eye tracking and the perception of motion in the absence of real motion,” Vision Res. 18, 1053–1059 (1978).
  12. H. J. Wyatt and J. Pola, “The role of perceived motion in smooth pursuit eye movements,” Vision Res. 19, 613–618 (1979).
  13. A. Mack, R. Fendrich, and J. Pleune, “Smooth pursuit eye movements: Is perceived motion necessary?” Science 203, 1361–1363 (1979).
  14. A. Mack, R. Fendrich, and E. Wong, “Is perceived motion a stimulus for smooth pursuit?” Vision Res. 22, 77–88 (1982).
  15. E. Kowler and S. P. McKee, “Sensitivity of smooth eye movement to small differences in target velocity,” Vision Res. 27, 993–1015 (1987).
  16. B. B. Beutter and L. S. Stone, “Human motion perception and smooth eye movements show similar directional biases for elongated apertures,” Vision Res. 38, 1273–1286 (1998).
  17. B. B. Beutter and L. S. Stone, “Motion coherence affects human perception and pursuit similarly,” Visual Neurosci. 17, 139–153 (2000).
  18. L. S. Stone, B. B. Beutter, and J. Lorenceau, “Visual motion integration for perception and pursuit,” Perception 29, 771–787 (2000).
  19. P. Cavanagh and G. Mather, “Motion: the long and the short of it,” Spatial Vision 4, 103–129 (1989).
  20. A. T. Smith, “The detection of second-order motion,” in Visual Detection of Motion, A. T. Smith and R. J. Snowden, eds. (Academic, London, 1994), pp. 145–176.
  21. C. Chubb and G. Sperling, “Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5, 1986–2006 (1988).
  22. J. M. Zanker, “Theta motion: a paradoxical stimulus to explore higher order motion extraction,” Vision Res. 33, 353–369 (1993).
  23. E. H. Adelson and J. R. Bergen, “Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 284–299 (1985).
  24. J. P. H. van Santen and G. Sperling, “Elaborated Reichardt detectors,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 300–321 (1985).
  25. A. B. Watson and A. J. Ahumada, “Model of human visual-motion sensing,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 322–342 (1985).
  26. F. Butzer, U. J. Ilg, and J. M. Zanker, “Smooth pursuit eye movements elicited by first- and second-order motion,” Exp. Brain Res. 115, 61–70 (1997).
  27. A. Lindner and U. J. Ilg, “Initiation of smooth pursuit eye movements to first-order and second-order motion stimuli,” Exp. Brain Res. 133, 450–456 (2000).
  28. L. R. Harris and A. T. Smith, “Motion defined exclusively by second-order characteristics does not evoke optokinetic nystagmus,” Visual Neurosci. 9, 565–570 (1992).
  29. C. Rashbass, “The relationship between saccadic and smooth tracking eye movements,” J. Physiol. (London) 159, 326–338 (1961).
  30. S. G. Lisberger and L. E. Westbrook, “Properties of visual inputs that initiate horizontal smooth pursuit eye movements in monkeys,” J. Neurosci. 5, 1662–1673 (1985).
  31. E. L. Keller and N. S. Kahn, “Smooth-pursuit initiation in the presence of a textured background in the monkey,” Vision Res. 26, 943–955 (1986).
  32. M. J. Hawken and K. R. Gegenfurtner, “Motion of second-order stimuli: smooth pursuit eye movements and perceived speed,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. Suppl. 37, S741 (1996).
  33. H. Crane and C. Steele, “Accurate three-dimensional eye tracker,” Appl. Opt. 17, 691–705 (1978).
  34. D. L. Ringach, M. J. Hawken, and R. M. Shapley, “Binocular eye movements caused by the perception of three-dimensional structure from motion,” Vision Res. 36, 1479–1492 (1996).
  35. H. Deubel and B. Bridgeman, “Fourth purkinje image signals reveal eye-lens deviations and retinal image distortions during saccades,” Vision Res. 35, 529–538 (1995).
  36. J. R. Carl and R. S. Gellman, “Human smooth pursuit: stimulus-dependent responses,” J. Neurophysiol. 57, 1446–1463 (1987).
  37. E. Kowler and R. M. Steinman, “The effect of expectations on slow oculomotor control. I. Periodic target steps,” Vision Res. 19, 619–632 (1979).
  38. E. Kowler and R. M. Steinman, “The effect of expectations on slow oculomotor control. II. Single target displacements,” Vision Res. 19, 633–646 (1979).
  39. E. Kowler and R. M. Steinman, “The effect of expectations on slow oculomotor control. III. Guessing unpredictable target displacements,” Vision Res. 21, 191–203 (1981).
  40. E. Kowler, “The role of visual and cognitive processes in the control of eye movement,” in Eye Movements and Their Role in Visual and Cognitive Processes, E. Kowler, ed. [Elsevier Science Publishers BV (Biomedical Division), 1990], pp. 1–70.
  41. R. J. Krauzlis, “The visual drive for smooth pursuit eye movements,” in Visual Detection of Motion, A. T. Smith and R. J. Snowden, eds. (Academic, London, 1994), pp. 437–473.
  42. S. G. Lisberger, E. J. Morris, and L. Tychsen, “Visual motion processing and sensorimotor integration for smooth pursuit eye movements,” Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 97–129 (1987).
  43. F. A. Miles, K. Kawano, and L. M. Optican, “Short-latency ocular-following responses of monkey. I. Dependence on temporospatial properties of the visual input,” J. Neurophysiol. 56, 1321–1354 (1986).
  44. R. S. Gellman and J. R. Carl, “Motion processing for saccadic eye movements in humans,” Exp. Brain Res. 84, 660–667 (1991).
  45. A. E. Seiffert and P. Cavanagh, “Position displacement, not velocity, is the cue to motion detection of second-order stimuli,” Vision Res. 38, 3569–3582 (1998).
  46. T. E. Reisbeck and K. R. Gegenfurtner, “Velocity tuned mechanisms in human motion perception,” Vision Res. 39, 3267–3286 (1999).
  47. H. G. Kimmig, F. A. Miles, and U. Schwarz, “Effects of stationary textured backgrounds on the initiation of pursuit eye movements in monkeys,” J. Neurophysiol. 68, 2147–2164 (1992).
  48. R. E. Yee, S. A. Daniels, O. W. Jones, R. W. Baloh, and V. Honrubia, “Effects of an optokinetic background on pursuit eye movements,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 24, 1115–1122 (1983).
  49. H. Collewijn and E. P. Tamminga, “Human smooth and saccadic eye movements during voluntary pursuit of different target motions on different backgrounds,” J. Physiol. 351, 217–250 (1984).
  50. H. Collewijn and E. P. Tamminga, “Human fixation and pursuit in normal and open-loop conditions: effects of central and peripheral retinal targets,” J. Physiol. 379, 109–129 (1986).
  51. E. Kowler, J. van der Steen, E. P. Tamminga, and H. Collewijn, “Voluntary selection of the target for smooth eye movement in the presence of superimposed, full-field stationary and moving stimuli,” Vision Res. 24, 1789–1798 (1984).
  52. E. Kowler, B. J. Murphy, and R. M. Steinman, “Velocity matching during smooth pursuit of different targets on different backgrounds,” Vision Res. 18, 603–605 (1978).
  53. T. D. Albright, “Form–cue invariant motion processing in primate visual cortex,” Science 225, 1141–1143 (1992).
  54. K. R. Gegenfurtner and M. J. Hawken, “Perceived velocity of luminance, chromatic and non-Fourier stimuli: influ-ence of contrast and temporal frequency,” Vision Res. 36, 1281–1289 (1996).
  55. H. R. Wilson, V. P. Ferrera, and C. Yo, “A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception,” Visual Neurosci. 9, 79–97 (1992).
  56. K. R. Gegenfurtner and M. J. Hawken, “Interaction of colour and motion in the visual pathways,” Trends Neurosci. 19, 394–401 (1996).
  57. P. Thompson, “Perceived rate of movement depends on contrast,” Vision Res. 22, 377–380 (1982).
  58. L. S. Stone and P. Thompson, “Human speed perception is contrast dependent,” Vision Res. 32, 1535–1549 (1992).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited