OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 19, Iss. 12 — Dec. 1, 2002
  • pp: 2363–2373

Peripheral refractive errors in myopic, emmetropic, and hyperopic young subjects

Anne Seidemann, Frank Schaeffel, Antonio Guirao, Noberto Lopez-Gil, and Pablo Artal  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 19, Issue 12, pp. 2363-2373 (2002)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.19.002363


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (544 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

To gain more insight into the relationship between foveal and peripheral refractive errors in humans, spheres, cylinders, and their axes were binocularly measured across the visual field in myopic, emmetropic, and hyperopic groups of young subjects. Both automated infrared photorefraction (the “PowerRefractor”; www.plusoptix.de) and a double-pass technique were used because the PowerRefractor provided extensive data from the central 44 deg of the visual field in a very convenient and fast way. Two-dimensional maps for the average cross cylinders and spherical equivalents, as well as for the axes of the power meridians of the cylinders, were created. A small amount of lower-field myopia was detected with a significant vertical gradient in spherical equivalents. In the central visual field there was little difference among the three refractive groups. The established double-pass technique provided complementary data also from the far periphery. At 45 deg eccentricity the double-pass technique revealed relatively more hyperopic spherical equivalents in myopic subjects than in emmetropic subjects [±2.73±2.85 D relative to the fovea, p<0.01 (±standard deviation)] and more myopic spherical equivalents in hyperopic subjects (-3.84±2.86 D relative to the fovea, p<0.01). Owing to the pronounced peripheral astigmatism, spherical equivalents (refractions with respect to the plane of the circle of least confusion) became myopic relative to the fovea in all three groups. The finding of general peripheral myopia was unexpected. Its possible roles in foveal refractive development are discussed.

© 2002 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(170.0170) Medical optics and biotechnology : Medical optics and biotechnology
(330.4300) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision system - noninvasive assessment
(330.4460) Vision, color, and visual optics : Ophthalmic optics and devices
(330.7310) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision

History
Original Manuscript: January 28, 2002
Revised Manuscript: July 18, 2002
Manuscript Accepted: July 18, 2002
Published: December 1, 2002

Citation
Anne Seidemann, Frank Schaeffel, Antonio Guirao, Noberto Lopez-Gil, and Pablo Artal, "Peripheral refractive errors in myopic, emmetropic, and hyperopic young subjects," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19, 2363-2373 (2002)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-19-12-2363


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. J. Wallman, M. D. Gottlieb, V. Rajaram, L. A. Fugate-Wentzek, “Local retinal regions control local eye growth and myopia,” Science 237, 73–77 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. S. Diether, F. Schaeffel, “Local defocus and local eye growth in chicks with normal accommodation,” Vision Res. 37, 659–668 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. S. McFadden, “Partial occlusion produces local form deprivation myopia in the guinea pig eye,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. Suppl. 43, #189 (ARVO abstract2002).
  4. N. A. McBrien, P. Lawlor, A. Gentle, “Scleral remodelling during the development of and recovery from axial myopia in tree shrew,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 41, 3713–3719 (2000).
  5. J. T. Siegwart, T. T. Norton, “Regulation of the mechanical properties of tree shrew sclera by the visual environment,” Vision Res. 39, 387–407 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. M. Millodot, “Effect of ametropia on peripheral refraction,” Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 58, 691–695 (1981). [PubMed]
  7. J. Love, B. Gilmartin, M. C. M. Dunne, “Relative peripheral refractive error in adult myopia and emmetropia,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. Suppl. 41, #1592 (ARVO abstract2000).
  8. D. O. Mutti, R. I. Sholtz, N. E. Friedman, K. Zadnik, “Peripheral refraction and ocular shape in children,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 41, 1022–1030 (2000).
  9. M. C. Dunne, D. A. Barnes, R. A. Clement, “A model for retinal shape changes in ametropia,” Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 7, 159–160 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. M. C. Dunne, D. A. Barnes, “Modelling oblique astigma-tism in eyes with known peripheral refraction and optical dimensions,” Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 10, 46–48 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. F. Schaeffel, H. Wilhelm, E. Zrenner, “Inter-individual variability in the dynamics of natural accommodation in humans: relation to age and refractive error,” J. Physiol. (London) 461, 301–320 (1993).
  12. P. Artal, S. Marcos, R. Navarro, D. R. Williams, “Odd aberrations and double pass measurements of retinal image quality,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12, 195–201 (1995). [CrossRef]
  13. M. Choi, S. Weiss, F. Schaeffel, A. Seidemann, H. C. Howland, B. Wilhelm, H. Wilhelm, “Laboratory, clinical and kindergarten test of a new infrared photorefractor (PowerRefractor),” Optom. Vision Sci. 77, 537–548 (2000). [CrossRef]
  14. F. Gekeler, F. Schaeffel, H. C. Howland, J. Wattam-Bell, “Measurement of astigmatism by automated infrared photorefraction,” Optom. Vision Sci. 74, 472–482 (1997). [CrossRef]
  15. F. Schaeffel, “Kappa and Hirschberg ratio measured with an automated video gaze tracker,” Optom. Vision Sci. 79, 329–334 (2002). [CrossRef]
  16. J. Santamarı́a, P. Artal, J. Bescós, “Determination of the point-spread function of the human eye using a hybrid optical-digital method,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 1109–1114 (1987). [CrossRef]
  17. A. Guirao, C. Gonzales, M. Redondo, E. Geraghty, S. Norrby, P. Artal, “Average optical performance of the human eye as a function of age in a normal population,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 40, 203–213 (1999).
  18. R. Navarro, P. Artal, D. R. Williams, “Modulation transfer of the human eye as a function of eccentricity,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 201–212 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. P. Artal, A. M. Derrington, E. Colombo, “Refraction, aliasing, and the absence of motion reversals in peripheral vision,” Vision Res. 35, 939–947 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. A. Guirao, P. Artal, “Off-axis monochromatic aberrations estimated from double-pass measurements in the human eye,” Vision Res. 39, 207–217 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. P. Artal, I. Iglesias, N. Lopez-Gil, D. G. Green, “Double-pass measurements of the retinal image quality with unequal entrance and exit pupils sizes and the reversibility of the eye’s optical system,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12, 2358–2366 (1995). [CrossRef]
  22. U. Oechsner, R. Kusel, “Multimeridional refraction: dependence of the measurement accuracy on the number of meridians refracted,” Optom. Vision Sci. 73, 425–433 (1997). [CrossRef]
  23. W. F. Harris, “Algebra of sphero-cylinders and refractive errors, and their means, variance, and standard deviation,” Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 65, 794–802 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. G. L. Walls, The Vertebrate Eye and Its Adaptive Radiation (Cranebrook Institute of Science, Bloomfield Hills, Mich., 1942).
  25. J. G. Sivak, “An evaluation of the ‘ramp’ retina of the horse eye,” Vision Res. 15, 1353–1356 (1975). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. C. E. Ferree, G. Rand, C. Hardy, “Refractive asymmetry in the temporal and nasal halves of the visual field,” Am. J. Ophthalmol. 15, 513–522 (1932).
  27. W. Lotmar, “Theoretical eye model with aspherics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 61, 1522–1529 (1971). [CrossRef]
  28. W. Lotmar, T. Lotmar, “Peripheral astigmatism in the human eye: experimental data and theoretical predictions,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 64, 510–513 (1974). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. D. D. R. Williams, P. Artal, R. Navarro, R. N. McMahon, D. Brainard, “Off-axis optical quality and retinal sampling in the human eye,” Vision Res. 36, 1103–1114 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. J. A. M. Jennings, W. N. Charman, “Off-axis image quality of the human eye,” Vision Res. 21, 445–455 (1981). [CrossRef]
  31. M. C. Dunne, G. P. Misson, E. K. White, D. A. Barnes, “Peripheral astigmatic asymmetry and the angle alpha,” Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 13, 303–305 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Y. Z. Wang, L. N. Thibos, A. Bradley, “Effects of refractive error on detection acuity and resolution acuity in peripheral vision,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 38, 2134–2142 (1997).
  33. T. Wertheim, “Über die indirekte Sehschärfe,” Z. Psychol. Physiol. Sinnesorgane 7, 172–187 (1894).
  34. W. Smith, Modern Optical Engineering (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966), p. 321.
  35. C. R. Ferree, G. Rand, C. Hardy, “Refraction for the peripheral field of vision,” Arch. Ophthalmol. 5, 717–731 (1931). [CrossRef]
  36. W. Hodos, J. T. Erichsen, “Lower field myopia in birds: an adaptation that keeps the ground in focus,” Vision Res. 30, 653–659 (1990). [CrossRef]
  37. F. W. Fitzke, B. P. Hayes, W. Hodos, A. L. Holden, J. C. Low, “Refractive sectors in the visual field of the pigeon eye,” J. Physiol. (London) 369, 17–31 (1985).
  38. F. Schaeffel, G. Hagel, J. Eikerman, T. Collett, “Lower-field myopia and astigmatism in amphibians and chickens,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 487–495 (1994). [CrossRef]
  39. J. Wallman, J. Winawer, X. Zhu, T. W. Park, “Might myopic defocus prevent myopia?” in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Myopia, F. Thorn, D. Troilo, J. Gwiazda, eds. (Published by editors, Boston, Mass., 2000), pp. 138–142.
  40. F. Rempt, J. Hooger-Heide, W. P. H. Hoogenboom , “Peripheral retinoscopy and the skiagram,” Opththalmologica 165, 1–10 (1971). [CrossRef]
  41. E. L. Smith, J. Huang, L. F. Huang, “Cylindrical spectacle lenses alter emmetropization and produce astigmatism in young monkeys,” in Myopia Updates. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Myopia, T. Tokoro, ed. (Springer, Berlin, 1998), pp. 336–343.
  42. R. C. McLean, J. Wallman, “Despite severe imposed astigmatic blur, chicks compensate for spectacle lenses,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. Suppl. 38, #2521 (ARVO abstract1997).
  43. K. Schmid, C. F. Wildsoet, “Natural and imposed astigmatism and their relation to emmetropization in the chick,” Exp. Eye Res. 64, 837–847 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. A. Seidemann, A. Guirao, P. Artal, F. Schaeffel, “Peripheral sphere and astigmatism measured by infrared photoretinoscopy and by double pass point spread,” in Vision Science and Its Applications, Vol. 1 of 1999 OSA Technical Digest Series (Optical Society of America, Washington, D.C., 1999), pp. 224–227.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited