OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Vol. 19, Iss. 6 — Jun. 1, 2002
  • pp: 1049–1062

Neural grouping and geometric effect in the determination of apparent orientation

Ko Sakai and Yuzo Hirai  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 19, Issue 6, pp. 1049-1062 (2002)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (733 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



We propose that neural grouping of retinotopically distributed responses in the primary visual cortex (V1) is essential for the determination of apparent tilt, including the tilt illusion. Our psychophysical study shows that apparent tilt is independent of stereo disparity, hue, or contrast of bars, which determine the ownership of their intersection. This leads us to suspect that the neuronal responses within the intersection are excluded from the computation of apparent tilt. To investigate the underlying cortical mechanisms, we developed and examined a V1 network model including the collinear connections observed in the superficial layers. The model shows good agreement with the results of psychophysical experiments, including segmentation independence, contrast dependence, and apparent tilt for various stimuli. The results suggest that collinear connections underlie the neural grouping that excludes the intersection region and establishes the independence of segmentation.

© 2002 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.3790) Vision, color, and visual optics : Low vision
(330.4060) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision modeling
(330.5020) Vision, color, and visual optics : Perception psychology
(330.5510) Vision, color, and visual optics : Psychophysics
(330.6110) Vision, color, and visual optics : Spatial filtering
(330.7310) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision

Original Manuscript: May 10, 2001
Revised Manuscript: January 3, 2002
Manuscript Accepted: January 3, 2002
Published: June 1, 2002

Ko Sakai and Yuzo Hirai, "Neural grouping and geometric effect in the determination of apparent orientation," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19, 1049-1062 (2002)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. C. Blakemore, R. H. S. Carpenter, M. A. Georgeson, “Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the human visual system,” Nature (London) 228, 37–39 (1970). [CrossRef]
  2. A. B. Bonds, “Role of inhibition in the specification of orientation selectivity of cells in the cat striate cortex,” Visual Neurosci. 2, 41–55 (1989). [CrossRef]
  3. L. A. Bauman, A. B. Bonds, “Inhibitory refinement of spatial frequency selectivity in single cells of the cat striate cortex,” Vision Res. 31, 933–944 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. M. A. Paradiso, “A theory for the use of visual orientation information which exploits the columnar structure of striate cortex,” Biol. Cybern. 58, 35–49 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. C. D. Gilbert, T. N. Wiesel, “The influence of contextual stimuli on the orientation selectivity of cells in primary visual cortex of the cat,” Vision Res. 30, 1689–1701 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. K. Sakai, S. Tanaka, “Retinotopic coding and neural grouping in tilt illusion,” Neurocomputing 26–27, 837–843 (1999). [CrossRef]
  7. M. J. Morgan, C. Casco, “Spatial filtering and spatial primitives in early vision: an explanation of the Zöllner–Judd class of geometrical illusion,” Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 242, 1–10 (1990). [CrossRef]
  8. M. J. Morgan, “The Poggendorff illusion: a bias in the estimation of the orientation of virtual lines by second-stage filters,” Vision Res. 39, 2361–2380 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. M. J. Morgan, S. Baldassi, “How the human visual system encodes the orientation of a texture, and why it makes mistakes,” Curr. Biol. 7, 999–1002 (1997). [CrossRef]
  10. A. V. Popple, D. Sagi, “A Fraser illusion without local cues?” Vision Res. 40, 873–878 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. M. J. Morgan, A. J. S. Mason, S. Baldassi, “Are there separate first-order and second-order mechanisms for orientation discrimination?” Vision Res. 40, 1751–1763 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. R. von der Heydt, E. Peterhans, “Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex. I. Lines of pattern discontinuity,” J. Neurosci. 9, 1731–1748 (1989). [PubMed]
  13. J. S. Bakin, K. Nakayama, C. D. Gilbert, “Visual responses in monkey areas V1 and V2 to three-dimensional surface configurations,” J. Neurosci. 20, 8188–8198 (2000). [PubMed]
  14. H. Zhou, H. S. Friedman, R. von der Heydt, “Coding of border ownership in monkey visual cortex,” J. Neurosci. 20, 6594–6611 (2000). [PubMed]
  15. M. K. Kapadia, G. Westheimer, C. D. Gilbert, “Spatial distribution of contextual interactions in primary visual cortex and in visual perception,” J. Neurophysiol. 84, 2048–2062 (2000). [PubMed]
  16. A. F. Rossi, R. Desimone, L. G. Ungerleider, “Contextual modulation in primary visual cortex of macaques,” J. Neurosci. 21, 1698–1709 (2001). [PubMed]
  17. L. Chao-Yi, G. Kun, “Measurement of geometric illusions, illusory contours and stereo-depth at luminance and colour contrast,” Vision Res. 35, 1713–1720 (1995). [CrossRef]
  18. R. H. S. Carpenter, C. Blakemore, “Interactions between orientations in human vision,” Exp. Brain Res. 18, 287–303 (1973). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. M. K. Kapadia, G. Westheimer, C. D. Gilbert, “Dynamics in spatial summation in primary visual cortex of alert monkeys,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 12073–12078 (1999). [CrossRef]
  20. T. Oyama, “Determinants of the Zöllner illusion,” Psychol. Res. 37, 261–280 (1975). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. S. Magnussen, W. Kurtenbach, “Linear summation of tilt illusion and tilt aftereffect,” Vision Res. 20, 39–42 (1980). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. K. Sakai, L. H. Finkel, “Characterization of spatial-frequency spectrum in the perception of shape from texture,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12, 1208–1224 (1995). [CrossRef]
  23. J. Rovamo, V. Virsu, R. Näsänen, “Cortical magnification factor predicts the photopic contrast sensitivity of peripheral vision,” Nature (London) 271, 54–56 (1978). [CrossRef]
  24. A. Yuille, N. M. Grzywacz, “A winner-take-all mechanism based on presynaptic inhibition feedback,” Neural Comput. 1, 334–347 (1989). [CrossRef]
  25. S. Kaski, T. Kohonen, “Winner-take-all networks for physiological models of competitive learning,” Neural Networks 7, 973–984 (1994). [CrossRef]
  26. C. D. Gilbert, T. N. Wiesel, “Columnar specificity of intrinsic horizontal and corticocortical connections in cat visual cortex,” J. Neurosci. 9, 2432–2442 (1989). [PubMed]
  27. W. H. Bosking, Y. Zhang, B. Schofield, D. Fitzpatrick, “Orientation selectivity and the arrangement of horizontal connections in tree shrew striate cortex,” J. Neurosci. 17, 2112–2127 (1997). [PubMed]
  28. S-C. Yen, L. H. Finkel, “Extraction of perceptually salient contours by striate cortical networks,” Vision Res. 38, 719–741 (1998). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Z. Li, “A neural model of contour integration in the primary visual cortex,” Neural Comput. 10, 903–940 (1998). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. K. Sakai, S. Tanaka, “Spatial pooling in the second-order spatial structure of cortical complex cells,” Vision Res. 40, 855–871 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Y. Kuramoto, Lecture Notes in Physics 39 (Springer, Berlin, 1975).
  32. S-C. Yen, E. D. Menschik, L. H. Finkel, “Perceptual grouping in striate cortical networks mediated by synchronization and desynchronization,” Neurocomputing 26–27, 609–616 (1999). [CrossRef]
  33. T. Mundel, A. Dimitrov, J. D. Cowan, “Visual cortex circuitry and orientation tuning,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 9 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1997), pp. 887–893.
  34. G. B. Ermentrout, “The behavior of rings of coupled oscillators,” J. Math. Biol. 23, 55–74 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. C. von der Malsburg, J. Buhmann, “Sensory segmentation with coupled neural oscillators,” Biol. Cybern. 67, 233–242 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. S. H. Strogatz, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1994).
  37. P. Wenderoth, T. O’Connor, M. Johnson, “The tilt illusion as a function of the relative and absolute lengths of test and inducing lines,” Percept. Psychophys. 39, 339–345 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. F. W. Campbell, J. G. Gibson, “Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings,” J. Physiol. 197, 551–566 (1968).
  39. K. Sakai, S. Tanaka, “Preceptual segmentation and neural grouping in tilt illusion,” Neurocomputing 32–33, 979–986 (2000). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited