OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Vol. 19, Iss. 7 — Jul. 1, 2002
  • pp: 1267–1273

Contrast discrimination with sinusoidal gratings of different spatial frequency

C. M. Bird, G. B. Henning, and F. A. Wichmann  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 19, Issue 7, pp. 1267-1273 (2002)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (168 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



The detectability of contrast increments was measured as a function of the contrast of a masking or “pedestal” grating at a number of different spatial frequencies ranging from 2 to 16 cycles per degree of visual angle. The pedestal grating always had the same orientation, spatial frequency, and phase as the signal. The shape of the contrast-increment threshold versus pedestal contrast (TvC) functions depends on the performance level used to define the “threshold,” but when both axes are normalized by the contrast corresponding to 75% correct detection at each frequency, the TvC functions at a given performance level are identical. Confidence intervals on the slope of the rising part of the TvC functions are so wide that it is not possible with our data to reject Weber’s law.

© 2002 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.1880) Vision, color, and visual optics : Detection
(330.5000) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision - patterns and recognition
(330.5510) Vision, color, and visual optics : Psychophysics
(330.7310) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision

C. M. Bird, G. B. Henning, and F. A. Wichmann, "Contrast discrimination with sinusoidal gratings of different spatial frequency," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19, 1267-1273 (2002)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset


  1. F. W. Campbell and J. G. Robson, “Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings,” J. Physiol. (London) 197, 551–556 (1968).
  2. G. E. Legge and J. M. Foley, “Contrast masking in human vision,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 70, 1458–1471 (1980).
  3. D. J. Swift and R. A. Smith, “Spatial frequency masking and Weber’s law,” Vision Res. 23, 495–505 (1983).
  4. G. B. Henning, B. G. Hertz, and D. E. Broadbent, “Some experiments bearing on the hypothesis that the visual system analyses patterns in independent bands of spatial frequency,” Vision Res. 15, 887–899 (1975).
  5. A. M. Derrington and G. B. Henning, “Some observations on the masking effects of two-dimensional stimuli,” Vision Res. 29, 241–246 (1989).
  6. F. W. Campbell and J. J. Kulikowski, “Orientation selectivity of the human visual system,” J. Physiol. (London) 187, 437–445 (1966).
  7. J. Nachmias and R. V. Sansbury, “Grating contrast: discrimination may be better than detection,” J. Physiol. (London) 14, 1039–1042 (1974).
  8. B. Leshowitz and D. H. Raab, “Effects of stimulus duration on the detection of sinusoids added to continuous pedestals,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 41, 489–496 (1967).
  9. D. M. Green and J. A. Swets, Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics (Wiley, New York, 1966).
  10. G. B. Henning, “Amplitude discrimination in noise, pedestal experiments, and additivity of masking,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 45, 426–435 (1969).
  11. F. A. Wichmann, G. B. Henning, and A. C. Ploghaus, “Nonlinearities and the pedestal effect,” Perception 27, S86 (1998).
  12. J. J. Kulikowski and P. E. King-Smith, “Spatial arrangement of line, edge and grating detectors revealed by subthreshold summation,” Vision Res. 13, 1455–1478 (1973).
  13. D. M. Green, “Psychoacoustics and detection theory,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 32, 1189–1203 (1960).
  14. J. M. Foley and G. E. Legge, “Contrast detection and near-threshold discrimination in human vision,” Vision Res. 21, 1041–1053 (1981).
  15. D. G. Pelli, “Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 1508–1532 (1985).
  16. J. M. Foley, “Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: masking experiments require a new model,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 1710–1719 (1994).
  17. F. A. Wichmann, “Some aspects of modelling human spatial vision: contrast discrimination,” D. Phil. thesis, Oxford University, Oxford, UK, 1999.
  18. D. G. Pelli and L. Zhang, “Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays,” Vision Res. 31, 1337–1350 (1991).
  19. F. A. Wichmann and N. J. Hill, “The psychometric function I: fitting, sampling and goodness-of-fit,” Percept. Psychophys. 63, 1293–1313 (2001).
  20. F. A. Wichmann and N. J. Hill, “The psychometric function II: bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling,” Percept. Psychophys. 63, 1314–1329 (2001).
  21. N. J. Hill, “Testing hypotheses about psychometric functions: an investigation of some confidence interval methods, their accuracy, and their use in evaluating optimal sampling strategies,” D. Phil. thesis, Oxford University, Oxford, UK, 2001.
  22. M. V. Levine, “Transformations that render curves parallel,” J. Math. Psychol. 7, 410–443 (1970).
  23. J. G. Robson, “Spatial and temporal contrast-sensitivity functions of the visual system,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 1141–1142 (1966).
  24. D. H. Kelly, “Flickering patterns and lateral inhibition,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 59, 1361–1370 (1969).
  25. G. E. Legge, “A power law for contrast discrimination,” Vision Res. 21, 457–467 (1981).
  26. A. Bradley and I. Ohzawa, “A comparison of contrast detection and discrimination,” Vision Res. 26, 991–997 (1986).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited