Table 1
Influence of the Distance of Propagation and the Number of Gaussian Beams on the SFOR in the Case (Subsection 5.A) Where
and
N
|
|
|
|
---|
12 | 21/25 | 17/25 | 15/25 |
16 | 29/33 | 25/33 | 23/33 |
20 | 37/41 | 33/41 | 31/41 |
Table 2
Influence of the Compression Ratio, the Distance of Propagation, and the Number of Gaussian Beams on the SFOR in the Case (Subsection 5.A) Where
and
N
|
|
|
|
---|
12 | 21/25 | 18/25 | 17/25 |
16 | 29/33 | 27/33 | 25/33 |
20 | 37/41 | 35/41 | 33/41 |
Table 3
Maximum Absolute Value of the Difference between Moduli of
from Eqs. (15
) and (19
) Due to
Where
and
N
|
|
|
|
---|
8 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
Table 4
Maximum Absolute Value of the Difference between Moduli of
from Eqs. (15
) and (24
), Where
and
N
|
|
|
|
---|
12 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
Table 5
Maximum Absolute Value of the Difference between Moduli of
from Eqs. (15
) and (24
), Where
and
N
|
|
|
|
---|
12 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
Table 6
Design Frame of an Axial Demultiplexing for
Fibers SFOR, Where
N
|
(μm) | τ |
m
|
(cm) |
(μm) |
|
|
|
---|
16 | 5 | 50 | 1 | 4.03 | 20.81 | 8.25 mm | 0/33 | 3/33 |
30 | 5 | 50 | 1 | 4.03 | 20.81 | 1.52 cm | 29/61 | 33/61 |
30 | 5 | 35 | 2 | 3.95 | 20.39 | 1.06 cm | 17/61 | 23/61 |
16 | 30 | 9 | 3 | 14.11 | 72.82 | 8.91 mm | 15/33 | 15/33 |
30 | 30 | 9 | 3 | 14.11 | 72.82 | 1.64 cm | 43/61 | 43/61 |
30 | 30 | 9 | 4 | 18.81 | 97.09 | 1.64 cm | 37/61 | 39/61 |
30
|
30
|
10.1
|
2
|
11.84
|
61.14
|
1.84 cm
|
47/61
|
49/61
|
30
|
30
|
10.1
|
3
|
17.76
|
91.71
|
1.84 cm
|
41/61
|
43/61
|
30 | 30 | 15 | 1 | 13.06 | 67.43 | 2.74 cm | 51/61 | 51/61 |
30 | 30 | 15 | 2 | 26.12 | 134.86 | 2.74 cm | 41/61 | 45/61 |
30 | 30 | 15 | 3 | 39.18 | 202.29 | 2.74 cm | 31/61 | 35/61 |