OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Vol. 19, Iss. 7 — Jul. 1, 2002
  • pp: 1406–1416

Effects of source coherence and aperture array geometry on optical sectioning strength in direct-view microscopy

Cian M. Taylor and Eithne M. McCabe  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 19, Issue 7, pp. 1406-1416 (2002)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (430 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Laser sources offer a possible solution to the problem of low light throughput in direct-view microscopes (DVMs). However, coherent source DVMs have been shown to suffer from problems such as increased sidelobes in the depth response because of coherent cross talk between neighboring apertures. We explore theoretically how source coherence affects the depth responses of DVMs by employing various aperture spacings and number of apertures. We show that, contrary to expectation, closely spaced apertures can result in decreased full width at half-maximum of the depth response curve. We explain this as an effect of destructive interference when cross talk between neighboring apertures occurs. Using apertures arranged in a square grid as an example, we move on to show that the use of aperture arrays that consist of regularly arranged apertures can accentuate the problematic sidelobes of the depth response. We show that arranging pinholes in a rectangular grid rather than a square grid can improve the optical sectioning strength significantly. Finally, by examination of the depth responses corresponding to the infinite-pinhole-array limit, we make some general statements about source coherence and the characteristics of arrays that are likely to perform well.

© 2002 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(030.1670) Coherence and statistical optics : Coherent optical effects
(180.1790) Microscopy : Confocal microscopy

Cian M. Taylor and Eithne M. McCabe, "Effects of source coherence and aperture array geometry on optical sectioning strength in direct-view microscopy," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19, 1406-1416 (2002)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset


  1. M. Minsky, “Microscopy apparatus,” U.S. patent 3,013,467 (December 19, 1961).
  2. M. D. Egger and M. Petráň, “New reflected-light microscope for viewing unstained brain and ganglion cells,” Science 157, 305–307 (1967).
  3. M. Petráň, M. Hadravský, M. D. Egger, and R. Galambos, “Tandem-scanning reflected-light microscope,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 58, 90–93 (1968).
  4. A. Boyde, M. Petráň, and M. Hadravský, “Tandem scanningreflected-light microscope of internal features in whole bone and tooth samples,” J. Microsc. (Oxford) 132, 1–7 (1983).
  5. G. Q. Xiao, T. R. Corle, and G. S. Kino, “Real-time confocal scanning optical microscope,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 716–718 (1988).
  6. E. M. McCabe, D. T. Fewer, A. C. Ottewill, S. J. Hewlett, and J. Hegarty, “Direct-view microscopy: optical sectioning strength for finite sized, multiple-pinhole arrays,” J. Microsc. (Oxford) 184, 95–105 (1996).
  7. S. J. Hewlett, D. T. Fewer, and E. M. McCabe, “Influence of source coherence and aperture distribution on the imaging properties in direct-view microscopy,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 1066–1075 (1997).
  8. D. T. Fewer, S. J. Hewlett, and E. M. McCabe, “Laser sources in direct-view-scanning, tandem-scanning, or Nipkow-disk-scanning microscopy,” Appl. Opt. 37, 380–385 (1998).
  9. C. J. R. Sheppard and T. Wilson, “The theory of the direct-view confocal microscope,” J. Microsc. (Oxford) 124, 107–117 (1981).
  10. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics (Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1997).
  11. H. H. Hopkins, “The frequency response of a defocused optical system,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 231, 91–103 (1955).
  12. J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1996).
  13. T. Wilson and S. J. Hewlett, “Optical sectioning strength of the direct-view microscope employing finite-sized pin-hole arrays,” J. Microsc. (Oxford) 163, 131–150 (1991).
  14. M. Liang, R. L. Stehr, and A. W. Krause, “Confocal pattern period in multiple-aperture confocal imaging systems with coherent illumination,” Opt. Lett. 22, 751–753 (1997).
  15. Q. S. Hanley, P. J. Verveer, M. J. Gemkow, and T. M. Jovin, “An optical sectioning programmable array microscope implemented with a digital micromirror device,” J. Microsc. (Oxford) 196, 317–331 (1999).
  16. H. Talbot, “Facts relating to optical science 4,” Philos. Mag. 9, 401–409 (1836).
  17. A. Egner and S. W. Hell, “Time multiplexing and parallelization in multifocal multiphoton microscopy,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17, 1192–1201 (2000).
  18. P. J. Smith, C. M. Taylor, A. J. Shaw, and E. McCabe, “Programmable array microscopy using a ferroelectric liquid crystal SLM,” Appl. Opt. 39, 2664–2669 (2000).
  19. C. M. Taylor, P. J. Smith, and E. M. McCabe, “A programmable array microscope demonstrator: application of a ferroelectric liquid crystal SLM,” in Three-Dimensional and Multidimensional Microscopy: Image Acquisition Processing VII, J.-A. Conchello, C. J. Cogswell, and T. Wilson, eds., Proc. SPIE 3919, 21–29 (2000).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited