OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Vol. 2, Iss. 10 — Oct. 1, 1985
  • pp: 1619–1628

Microdifferential holography

Mark Sharnoff  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 2, Issue 10, pp. 1619-1628 (1985)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1356 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



A novel coherent imaging method analogous to electronic differential amplification is described and analyzed. The method is well suited to highlighting local changes in the optical properties of a dynamic object whose more prominent details are largely static. The object may be examined either in transmitted light or in reflected light. The method discriminates between changes that result from substructural reorganization of object details too fine to be imaged as resolved structures and changes that result from the microdisplacement of optically resolved structures. Substructural reorganization is signaled by changes in the amplitude of the transmitted or reflected light, whereas ordinary displacement is displayed in the usual way through a change in phase. The method is capable of detecting displacements as small as several milliwavelengths. Images of contractile activity in muscle are presented that illustrate the method’s sensitivity and analytic power.

© 1985 Optical Society of America

Original Manuscript: October 10, 1984
Manuscript Accepted: May 13, 1985
Published: October 1, 1985

Mark Sharnoff, "Microdifferential holography," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 1619-1628 (1985)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. R. L. Powell, K. A. Stetson, “Interferometric vibration analysis by wavefront reconstruction,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 55, 1593–1598 (1965). [CrossRef]
  2. L. O. Heflinger, R. F. Wuerker, R. E. Brooks, “Holographic interferometry,” J. Appl. Phys. 37, 642–649 (1966). [CrossRef]
  3. K. A. Haines, B. P. Hildebrand, “Surface deformation measurement using the wavefront reconstruction technique,” Appl. Opt. 5, 595–602 (1966). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. C. M. Vest, Holographic Interferometry (Wiley, New York, 1979).
  5. W. Schumann, M. Dubas, Holographic Interferometry (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1979). [CrossRef]
  6. R. Jones, C. Wykes, Holographic Speckle Interferometry (Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, 1983), particularly Chaps. 3–5.
  7. K. Høgmoen, O. J. Løkberg, “Detection and measurement of small vibrations using electronic speckle pattern interferometry,” Appl. Opt. 16, 1869–1875 (1977). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. D. Gabor, G. W. Stroke, R. Restrick, A. Funkhouser, D. Brumm, “Optical image synthesis (complex amplitude addition and subtraction) by holographic Fourier transformation,” Phys. Lett. 18, 116–118 (1965). [CrossRef]
  9. M. Sharnoff, R. W. Henry, D. M. J. Bellezza, “Holographic visualization of the nerve impulse,” Biophys. J. 21, 109(A) (1978).
  10. M. Sharnoff, T. H. Karcher, L. P. Brehm, “Microdifferential holography and the polysarcomeric unit of activation of skeletal muscle,” Science 223, 822–825 (1984). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. R. J. Collier, C. B. Burckhardt, L. H. Lin, Optical Holography (Academic, New York, 1971), especially Chap. 10.
  12. J. F. Hamilton, “Reciprocity law failure” in The Theory of the Photographic Process, 3rd. ed., T. H. James, ed. (Macmillan, New York, 1966).
  13. The author has found that some holographic emulsions may fail this test in exposures of submillisecond duration, where, when the overall exposure does not exceed that which produces the brightest additive image, the positively unbalanced differential images appear to be systematically stronger than the negatively unbalanced ones. It would seem from the direction of this effect that hypersensitization and latensification12 lie at its origin. It is plausible that, when practical necessity requires exposure flashes so short as to cause reciprocity failure, well-planned departure from the equal-∊ rule may still secure the result that (I+ − I−) is independent of phase shifts in the subject wave.
  14. N. Bloembergen, E. M. Purcell, R. V. Pound, “Relaxation effects in nuclear magnetic resonance absorption,” Phys. Rev. 73, 679–712 (1948) (especially pp. 684–685). [CrossRef]
  15. Jenkins and White, Fundamentals of Optics, 2nd. ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1950).
  16. J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968).
  17. M. Born, E. Wolf, Principles of Optics, 3rd. ed. (Pergamon, Oxford, 1965), especially pp. 128–132.
  18. M. Born, E. Wolf, Principles of Optics, 3rd. ed. (Pergamon, Oxford, 1965), pp. 651–652.
  19. Because every nonvanishing even order is missing from the Fraunhofer diffraction pattern of a Ronchi grating, this value of |Φ/q| is smaller than it would be in many other cases. Grating examples exist for which |Φ/q| is larger than the value given by Eq. (22).
  20. In the spirit of the Rayleigh criterion,15 the sensitivity of the human eye has been arbitrarily taken to permit discrimination of temporally steady spatial variations of about 20%. The factor of ½ used here is appropriate because visual comparison of Iδ against I−δ is twice as sensitive as comparison of Iδ against the mean, ½(Iδ+ I−). The estimate made here is actually quite conservative, for the eye is really much more sensitive to sharp intensity gradients than Rayleigh assumed (see Ref. 19). The comparison of images or illumination intensities by means of the split-field comparator exploits this high sensitivity in a striking way.
  21. M. Alpern, “The eyes and vision,” in Handbook of Optics, W. G. Driscoll, ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978), especially Secs. 17 and 18.
  22. D. S. Smith, Muscle (Academic, New York, 1972).
  23. M. Sharnoff, L. P. Brehm, R. W. Henry, “Dynamic structures through microdifferential holography,” Biophys. J. (to be published).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited