OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Vol. 2, Iss. 5 — May. 1, 1985
  • pp: 705–712

Effect of light adaptation on the perceptual red–green and yellow–blue opponent-color responses

Shigeko Takahashi, Yoshimichi Ejima, and Munehira Akita  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 2, Issue 5, pp. 705-712 (1985)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1098 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Spectral sensitivities of the red–green and yellow–blue opponent-color responses were determined under broadband light adaptation for the light-adaptation levels of 5 to 5000 Td. With changing light-adaptation level, the spectral-sensitivity functions of the opponent-color systems change in shape, especially in the short-wavelength region of the spectrum. The light-adaptation effect on the red–green responses can be ascribed to the changes at the cone receptor level, whereas the light-adaptation effect on the yellow–blue responses can be ascribed to the changes at two sites, i.e., at the cone receptor site and at the opponent site.

© 1985 Optical Society of America

Original Manuscript: July 24, 1984
Manuscript Accepted: January 14, 1985
Published: May 1, 1985

Shigeko Takahashi, Yoshimichi Ejima, and Munehira Akita, "Effect of light adaptation on the perceptual red–green and yellow–blue opponent-color responses," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 705-712 (1985)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. L. M. Hurvich, D. Jameson, “An opponent-process theory of color vision,” Psychol. Rev. 64, 384–402 (1957). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. J. J. Vos, P. L. Walraven, “On the derivation of the foveal receptor primaries,” Vision Res. 11, 799–818 (1971). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. C. R. Ingling, B. H. Tsou, “Orthogonal combination of the three visual channels,” Vision Res. 17, 1075–1082 (1977). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. R. M. Boynton, Human Color Vision (Holt Rinehart & Winston, New York, 1979).
  5. S. L. Guth, R. W. Massof, T. Benzschawel, “Vector model for normal and dichromatic vision,”J. Opt. Soc. Am. 70, 197–212 (1980). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. V. C. Smith, J. Pokorny, “Spectral sensitivity of the foveal cone photopigments between 400 and 500 nm,” Vision Res. 15, 161–171 (1975). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. A. Eisner, D. I. A. MacLeod, “Blue sensitive cones do not contribute to luminance,”J. Opt. Soc. Am. 70, 121–124 (1980). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. B. W. Tansley, R. M. Boynton, “Chromatic border perception: the role of red- and green-sensitive cones,” Vision Res. 18, 683–697 (1978). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. P. Gouras, “Identification of cone mechanisms in monkey ganglion cells,”J. Physiol. (London) 199, 537–547 (1968).
  10. F. M. de Monasterio, P. Gouras, “Functional properties of ganglion cells of the rhesus monkey retina,”J. Physiol. London 251, 167–195 (1975). [PubMed]
  11. F. M. de Monasterio, “Macular pigmentation and the spectral sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of macaques,” Vision Res. 18, 1273–1277 (1978). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. E. Zrenner, P. Gouras, “Characteristics of the blue sensitive cone mechanism in primate retinal ganglion cells,” Vision Res. 21, 1605–1609 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. B. Drum, “Short-wavelength cones contribute to achromatic sensitivity,” Vision Res. 23, 1433–1439 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. R. T. Marrocco, “Responses of monkey optic tract fibers to monochromatic lights,” Vision Res. 12, 1167–1175 (1972). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. C. R. Ingling, “The spectral sensitivity of the opponent-color channels,” Vision Res. 17, 1083–1089 (1977). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. B. R. Wooten, J. S. Werner, “Short-wave cone input to the red-green opponent channel,” Vision Res. 19, 1053–1054 (1979). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. F. M. de Monasterio, “Signals from blue cones in ‘red-green’ opponent-color ganglion cells of the macaque retina,” Vision Res. 19, 441–449 (1979). [CrossRef]
  18. W. Richards, S. M. Luria, “Color-mixture functions at low luminance levels,” Vision Res. 4, 281–313 (1964). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. H. G. Sperling, R. S. Harwerth, “Red-green cone interactions in the increment-threshold spectral sensitivity of primates,” Science 172, 180–184 (1971). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. M. A. Finkelstein, D. C. Hood, “Detection and discrimination of small, brief lights: variable tuning of opponent channels,” Vision Res. 24, 175–181 (1984). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. C. R. Ingling, E. Martinez-Uriegas, “The relationship between spectral sensitivity and spatial sensitivity for the primate r-g X-channel,” Vision Res. 23, 1495–1500 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. G. Buchsbaum, A. Gottschalk, “Trichromacy, opponent colours coding and optimum colour information transmission in the retina,” Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 220, 89–113 (1983). [CrossRef]
  23. Y. Ejima, S. Takahashi, “Bezold–Brücke hue shift and nonlinearity in the opponent-color process,” Vision Res. 24, 1897–1904 (1984). [CrossRef]
  24. S. Takahashi, Y. Ejima, “Spatial properties of perceptual red-green and yellow-blue opponent-color processes,” Vision Res. 24, 987–994 (1984). [CrossRef]
  25. G. Westheimer, “The Maxwellian view,” Vision Res. 6, 669–682 (1966). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. T. N. Cornsweet, “The staircase method in psychophysics,” Am. J. Psychol. 75, 485–491 (1962). [CrossRef]
  27. In the preliminary experiment, the unique hue loci were determined with an adaptation of 5 to 5000 Td. The spectral loci of the unique green and the unique yellow were invariant with adaptation level, but the spectral loci of the unique blue varied, shifting toward the longer wavelengths with an increase in the light-adaptation level by about 8 nm. This brings about the problem of determining the blue-canceling light. Valberg28 and Burns et al.29 have shown that the loci of the yellow–blue null points determined for various color mixtures are not collinear. So, if the wavelength of the blue-canceling light is varied with light-adaptation level, it is difficult to separate the effect of the variation of the wavelength of blue-canceling light from the effect of the light adaptation. Therefore, we fixed the wavelength of the blue-canceling light for various adaptation levels.
  28. A. Valberg, “A method for the precise determination of achromatic colors including white,” Vision Res. 11, 157–160 (1971). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. S. A. Burns, A. E. Elsner, J. Pokorny, V. C. Smith, “Null coordinates for the opponent color channels,”J. Opt. Soc. Am. 69, 1406 (A) (1979).
  30. D. Jameson, L. M. Hurvich, “Some quantitative aspects of an opponent colors theory 1. Chromatic responses and spectral saturation,”J. Opt. Soc. Am. 45, 546–552 (1955). [CrossRef]
  31. D. B. Judd, “Basic correlates of the visual stimulus,” in Handbook of Experimental Psychology, S. S. Stevens, ed. (Wiley, New York, 1951).
  32. L. M. Hurvich, D. Jameson, “A psychophysical study of white. III. Adaptation as variant,”J. Opt. Soc. Am. 41, 787–801 (1951). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. C. M. Cicerone, D. H. Krantz, J. Larimer, “Opponent-process additivity. III. Effect of moderate chromatic adaptation,” Vision Res. 15, 1125–1135 (1975). [CrossRef]
  34. J. K. Bowmaker, H. J. A. Dartnall, “Visual pigments of rods and cones in a human retina,”J. Physiol. (London) 298, 501–511 (1980).
  35. G. Wyszecki, W. S. Stiles, Color Science (Wiley, New York, 1982).
  36. W. Paulus, A. Kröger-Paulus, “A new concept of retinal colour coding,” Vision Res. 23, 529–540 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. R. A. Normann, I. Perlman, “The effects of background illumination on the photoresponses of red and green cones,”J. Physiol. 286, 491–507 (1979). [PubMed]
  38. D. A. Burkhardt, G. Hassin, “Quantitative relations between color-opponent response of horizontal cells and action spectra of cones,”J. Neurophysiol. 49, 961–975 (1983). [PubMed]
  39. V. Virsu, B. B. Lee, “Light adaptation in cells of macaque lateral geniculate nucleus and its relation to human light adaptation,”J. Nuerophysiol. 50, 864–878 (1983).
  40. P. W. Trezona, “Rod participation in the ‘blue’ mechanism and its effect on color matching,” Vision Res. 10, 317–332 (1970). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. N. I. Benimoff, S. Schneider, D. C. Hood, “Interactions between rod and cone channels above threshold: a test of various models,” Vision Res. 22, 1133–1140 (1982). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. J. Larimer, D. H. Krantz, C. M. Cicerone, “Opponent process additivity—I: Red/green equilibria,” Vision Res. 14, 1127–1140 (1974). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. J. S. Werner, B. R. Wooten, “Opponent chromatic mechanisms: relation to photopigments and hue naming,”J. Opt. Soc. Am. 69, 422–434 (1979). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. This finding may be compatible with the suggestion of Larimer et al.,45 which states that a nonlinear function is approximately linear in S- and M-cone responses and nonlinear only in L-cone response.
  45. J. Larimer, D. H. Krantz, C. M. Cicerone, “Opponent process additivity—II. Yellow/blue equilibria and nonlinear models,” Vision Res. 15, 723–731 (1975). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. E. N. Pugh, J. D. Mollon, “A theory of the π1and π3color mechanisms of Stiles,” Vision Res. 19, 293–312 (1979). [CrossRef]
  47. J. D. Mollon, P. G. Polden, “Post-receptoral adaptation,” Vision Res. 19, 435–440 (1979). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited