OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 20, Iss. 10 — Oct. 1, 2003
  • pp: 1949–1957

Fundamental limits on isoplanatic correction with multiconjugate adaptive optics

Michael Lloyd-Hart and N. Mark Milton  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 20, Issue 10, pp. 1949-1957 (2003)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.20.001949


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (167 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We investigate the performance of a general multiconjugate adaptive optics (MCAO) system in which signals from multiple reference beacons are used to drive several deformable mirrors in the optical beam train. Taking an analytic approach that yields a detailed view of the effects of low-order aberration modes defined over the metapupil, we show that in the geometrical optics approximation, N deformable mirrors conjugated to different ranges can be driven to correct these modes through order N with unlimited isoplanatic angle, regardless of the distribution of turbulence along the line of sight. We find, however, that the optimal deformable mirror shapes are functions of target range, so the best compensation for starlight is in general not the correction that minimizes the wave-front aberration in a laser guide beacon. This introduces focal anisoplanatism in the wave-front measurements that can be overcome only through the use of beacons at several ranges. We derive expressions for the number of beacons required to sense the aberration to arbitrary order and establish necessary and sufficient conditions on their geometry for both natural and laser guide stars. Finally, we derive an expression for the residual uncompensated error by mode as a function of field angle, target range, and MCAO system geometry.

© 2003 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(010.1080) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Active or adaptive optics
(010.1330) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Atmospheric turbulence
(010.7350) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Wave-front sensing
(110.6960) Imaging systems : Tomography

History
Original Manuscript: December 2, 2002
Revised Manuscript: April 22, 2003
Manuscript Accepted: April 22, 2003
Published: October 1, 2003

Citation
Michael Lloyd-Hart and N. Mark Milton, "Fundamental limits on isoplanatic correction with multiconjugate adaptive optics," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20, 1949-1957 (2003)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-20-10-1949


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. J. R. P. Angel, M. Lloyd-Hart, E. K. Hege, R. J. Sarlot, C. Peng, “The 20/20 telescope: MCAO imaging at the individual and combined foci,” in Beyond Conventional Adaptive Optics, R. Ragazonni, ed. (Astronomical Observatory and Department of Astronomy, Padova, Italy, 2001). Available on line at http://www.adaopt.it/venice2001/proceedings/pdf/angel_pap.pdf , 2001.
  2. J. E. Nelson, “Design concepts for the California Extremely Large Telescope (CELT),” in Telescope Structures, Enclosures, Controls, Assembly/Integration/Validation, and Commissioning, T. A. Sebring, T. Andersen, eds., Proc. SPIE4004, 282–289 (2000). [CrossRef]
  3. P. Dierickx, R. Gilmozzi, “Progress of the OWL 100-m telescope conceptual design,” in Telescope Structures, Enclosures, Controls, Assembly/Integration/Validation, and Commissioning, T. A. Sebring, T. Andersen, eds. Proc. SPIE4004, 290–299 (2000). [CrossRef]
  4. J. M. Beckers, “Increasing the size of the isoplanatic patch with multiconjugate adaptive optics,” in ESO Conference on Very Large Telescopes and Their Instrumentation, M.-H. Ulrich, ed. (European Southern Observatory, Garching bei München, Germany, 1998), Vol. 2, pp. 693–703.
  5. I. De La Rue, B. L. Ellerbroek, “Multiconjugate adaptive optics with hybrid laser beacon systems,” in Adaptive Optics Systems and Technology II, R. K. Tyson, D. Bonaccini, M. C. Roggemann, eds., Proc. SPIE4494, 290–301 (2002). [CrossRef]
  6. D. Bonaccini, W. Hackenberg, R. Davies, M. Cullum, S. Rabien, E. Brunetto, T. Ott, M. Quattri, S. Hippler, E. Allaert, M. Dimmler, M. Tarenghi, A. van Kesteren, C. di Chirico, B. Buzzoni, P. Gray, U. Neumann, “VLT Laser Guide Star Facility: from one to many LGS,” in Beyond Conventional Adaptive Optics, R. Ragazonni, ed. (Astronomical Observatory and Department of Astronomy, Padova, Italy, 2001). Available on line at http://www.adaopt.it/venice2001/proceedings/pdf/bonaccini_pap.pdf , 2001.
  7. M. Lloyd-Hart, N. M. Milton, “Design and expected performance of the 6.5 m MMT MCAO system,” in Adaptive Optical System Technologies II, P. L. Wizinowich, D. Bonaccini, eds., Proc. SPIE4839, 578–587 (2003). [CrossRef]
  8. A. Tokovinin, M. Le Louarn, M. Sarazin, “Isoplanatism in a multiconjugate adaptive optics system,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17, 1819–1827 (2000). [CrossRef]
  9. A. Tokovinin, M. Le Louarn, E. Viard, N. Hubin, R. Conan, “Optimized modal tomography in adaptive optics,” Astron. Astrophys. 378, 710–721 (2001). [CrossRef]
  10. M. Le Louarn, M. Tallon, “Analysis of modes and behavior of a multiconjugate adaptive optics system,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19, 912–925 (2002). [CrossRef]
  11. B. L. Ellerbroek, F. J. Rigaut, “Methods for correcting tilt anisoplanatism in laser-guide-star-based multiconjugate adaptive optics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 2539–2547 (2001). [CrossRef]
  12. R. C. Flicker, “Sequence of phase correction in multiconjugate adaptive optics,” Opt. Lett. 26, 1743–1745 (2001). [CrossRef]
  13. M. C. Roggemann, A. C. Koivunen, “Branch-point reconstruction in laser beam projection through turbulence with finite-degree-of-freedom phase-only wave-front correction,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17, 53–62 (2000). [CrossRef]
  14. R. Ragazzoni, E. Marchetti, F. Rigaut, “Modal tomography for adaptive optics,” Astron. Astrophys. 342, L53–L56 (1999).
  15. F. J. Rigaut, B. L. Ellerbroek, R. Flicker, “Principles, limitations, and performance of multiconjugate adaptive optics,” in Adaptive Optical Systems Technology, P. L. Wizinowich, ed., Proc. SPIE4007, 1022–1031 (2000). [CrossRef]
  16. R. Angel, M. Lloyd-Hart, “Atmospheric tomography with Rayleigh laser beacons for correction of wide fields and 30-m-class telescopes,” in Adaptive Optical Systems Technology, P. L. Wizinowich, ed., Proc. SPIE4007, 270–276 (2000). [CrossRef]
  17. R. Flicker, F. J. Rigaut, B. L. Ellerbroek, “Comparison of multiconjugate adaptive optics configurations and control algorithms for the Gemini South 8-m telescope.,” in Adaptive Optical Systems Technology, P. L. Wizinowich, ed., Proc. SPIE4007, 1032–1043 (2000). [CrossRef]
  18. E. Viard, N. N. Hubin, M. Le Louarn, “Adaptive optics with four laser guide stars: cone effect correction on large telescopes,” in Adaptive Optical Systems Technology, P. L. Wizinowich, ed., Proc. SPIE4007, 106–114 (2000). [CrossRef]
  19. R. Ragazzoni, “Robust tilt determination from laser guide stars using a combination of different techniques,” Astron. Astrophys. 319, L9–L12 (1997).
  20. M. Schöck, R. Foy, M. Tallon, L. Noethe, J.-P. Pique, “Performance analysis of polychromatic laser guide stars used for wavefront tilt sensing,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 337, 910–920 (2002). [CrossRef]
  21. M. S. Belen’kii, S. J. Karis, J. M. Brown, R. Q. Fugate, “Experimental validation of a technique to measure tilt from a laser guide star,” Opt. Lett. 24, 637–639 (1999). [CrossRef]
  22. S. Esposito, R. Ragazzoni, A. Riccardi, C. O’Sullivan, N. Ageorges, M. Redfern, R. Davies, “Absolute tilt from a laser guide star: a first experiment,” Exp. Astron. 10, 135–145 (2000). [CrossRef]
  23. M. Lloyd-Hart, S. M. Jefferies, J. R. P. Angel, E. K. Hege, “Wave-front sensing with time-of-flight phase diversity,” Opt. Lett. 26, 402–404 (2001). [CrossRef]
  24. G. Rousset, “Wave-front sensors,” in Adaptive Optics in Astronomy, ed. F. Roddier (Oxford U. Press, New York, 1998), p. 118.
  25. R. J. Noll, “Zernike polynomials and atmospheric turbulence,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66, 207–211 (1976). [CrossRef]
  26. D. L. McKenna, R. Avila, J. M. Hill, S. Hippler, P. Salinari, P. C. Stanton, R. Weiss, “LBT facility SCIDAR: recent results,” in Adaptive Optical Systems Technologies II, P. L. Wizinowich, D. Bonaccini, eds., Proc. SPIE4839, 825–836 (2003). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited