OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Vol. 20, Iss. 3 — Mar. 1, 2003
  • pp: 499–507

Role of the tunneling ray in near-critical-angle scattering by a dielectric sphere

James A. Lock  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 20, Issue 3, pp. 499-507 (2003)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (191 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



The scattering far zone for light transmitted through a sphere following p−1 internal reflections by a family of near-grazing incident rays is subdivided into a lit region and a shadow region. The sharpness of the ray theory transition between the lit and the shadow regions is smoothed in wave theory by radiation shed by electromagnetic surface waves. It is shown that when higher-order terms in the physical optics approximation to the phase of the partial-wave scattering amplitudes are included, the transition between the lit and the shadow regions becomes a two-ray-to-zero-ray transition, called a superweak caustic in analogy to the more familiar scattering caustics and weak scattering caustics. One of the merged rays is a tunneling ray.

© 2003 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(080.1510) Geometric optics : Propagation methods
(290.0290) Scattering : Scattering
(290.4020) Scattering : Mie theory

James A. Lock, "Role of the tunneling ray in near-critical-angle scattering by a dielectric sphere," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20, 499-507 (2003)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset


  1. M. V. Berry and C. Upstill, “Catastrophe optics: morphologies of caustics and their diffraction patterns,” Prog. Opt. 18, 257–346 (1980).
  2. P. L. Marston and E. H. Trinh, “Hyperbolic umbilic diffraction catastrophe and rainbow scattering from spheroidal drops,” Nature 312, 529–531 (1984).
  3. J. F. Nye, “Rainbow scattering from spheroidal drops—an explanation of the hyperbolic umbilic foci,” Nature 312, 531–532 (1984).
  4. N. Fiedler-Ferrari, H. M. Nussenzveig, and W. J. Wiscombe, “Theory of near-critical-angle scattering from a curved interface,” Phys. Rev. A 43, 1005–1038 (1991).
  5. P. L. Marston, “Critical angle scattering by a bubble: physical-optics approximation and observations,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 69, 1205–1211 (1979).
  6. H. M. Nussenzveig, “High-frequency scattering by a transparent sphere. I. Direct reflection and transmission,” J. Math. Phys. 10, 82–124 (1969).
  7. H. M. Nussenzveig, “High-frequency scattering by an impenetrable sphere,” Ann. Phys. (New York) 34, 23–95 (1965).
  8. J. A. Lock and E. A. Hovenac, “Diffraction of a Gaussian beam by a spherical obstacle,” Am. J. Phys. 61, 698–707 (1993).
  9. The interpretation of the second stationary-phase point in terms of the tunneling ray was briefly discussed in J. A. Lock, “Cooperative effects among partial waves in Mie scattering,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5, 2032–2044 (1988).
  10. H. C. van de Hulst, Light Scattering by Small Particles (Dover, New York, 1981), pp. 203–206.
  11. E. Hecht, Optics, 2nd ed. (Addison-Wesley, Reading Mass., 1987), pp. 94–96.
  12. Ref. 10, pp. 206–207.
  13. Ref. 10, pp. 119–126.
  14. E. A. Hovenac and J. A. Lock, “Assessing the contributions of surface waves and complex rays to far-field Mie scattering by use of the Debye series,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 781–795 (1992).
  15. Ref. 10, pp. 208–209.
  16. M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, eds., Handbook of Mathematical Functions (National Bureau of Standards, Washington D.C., 1964), pp. 366–367, Eqs. (9.3.15, 9.3.16, 9.3.19, 9.3.20, 9.3.23, 9.3.24, 9.3.27, 9.3.28).
  17. Ref. 16, p. 446.
  18. Ref. 10, p. 213.
  19. K. W. Ford and J. A. Wheeler, “Semiclassical description of scattering,” Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 7, 259–286 (1959).
  20. Ref. 10, p. 212.
  21. M. V. Berry and K. E. Mount, “Semiclassical approximations in wave mechanics,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 35, 315–397 (1972), eq. (6.12).
  22. H. M. Nussenzveig, “High-frequency scattering by a transparent sphere. II. Theory of the rainbow and the glory,” J. Math. Phys. 10, 125–176 (1969), Figs. 7, 10.
  23. Ref. 16, p. 446, Eq. (10.4.9), and pp. 448–449, Eqs. (10.4.60, 10.4.64).
  24. Ref. 16, p. 478, Table 10.13.
  25. Ref. 16, p. 449, Eq. (10.4.63).
  26. A. W. Snyder and J. D. Love, “Reflection at a curved dielectric interface—electromagnetic tunneling,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. MTT-23, 134–141 (1975). It should be noted that Figs. 3b and 3c in Ref. 8 are in error in that the incident ray should strike the centrifugal barrier tangentially and then tunnel radially to the sphere surface.
  27. H. M. Nussenzveig, “Tunneling effects in diffractive scattering and resonance,” Comments At. Mol. Phys. 23, 175–187 (1989).
  28. B. R. Johnson, “Theory of morphology-dependent resonances: shape resonances and width formulas,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 343–352 (1993).
  29. H. M. Nussenzveig, “Complex angular momentum theory of the rainbow and the glory,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 69, 1068–1079, 1193–1194 (1979), Fig. 2.
  30. J. A. Lock, “Theory of the observations made of high-order rainbows from a single water droplet,” Appl. Opt. 26, 5291–5298 (1987).
  31. H. C. van de Hulst and R. T. Wang, “Glare points,” Appl. Opt. 30, 4755–4763 (1991).
  32. P. L. Marston, “Cusp diffraction catastrophe from spheroids: generalized rainbows and inverse scattering,” Opt. Lett. 10, 588–590 (1985).
  33. J. D. Walker, “Multiple rainbows from single drops of water and other liquids,” Am. J. Phys. 44, 421–433 (1976).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited