OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 20, Iss. 6 — Jun. 1, 2003
  • pp: 1035–1045

Marginal estimation of aberrations and image restoration by use of phase diversity

Amandine Blanc, Laurent M. Mugnier, and Jérôme Idier  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 20, Issue 6, pp. 1035-1045 (2003)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.20.001035


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (556 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We propose a novel method called marginal estimator for estimating the aberrations and the object from phase-diversity data. The conventional estimator found in the literature concerning the technique first proposed by Gonsalves has its basis in a joint estimation of the aberrated phase and the observed object. By means of simulations, we study the behavior of the conventional estimator, which is interpretable as a joint maximum <i>a posteriori</i> approach, and we show in particular that it has undesirable asymptotic properties and does not permit an optimal joint estimation of the object and the aberrated phase. We propose a novel marginal estimator of the sole phase by maximum <i>a posteriori</i>. It is obtained by integrating the observed object out of the problem. This reduces drastically the number of unknowns, allows the unsupervised estimation of the regularization parameters, and provides better asymptotic properties. We show that the marginal method is also appropriate for the restoration of the object. This estimator is implemented and its properties are validated by simulations. The performance of the joint method and the marginal one is compared on both simulated and experimental data in the case of Earth observation. For the studied object, the comparison of the quality of the phase restoration shows that the performance of the marginal approach is better under high-noise-level conditions.

© 2003 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(100.1830) Image processing : Deconvolution
(100.3020) Image processing : Image reconstruction-restoration
(100.3190) Image processing : Inverse problems
(110.6770) Imaging systems : Telescopes

Citation
Amandine Blanc, Laurent M. Mugnier, and Jérôme Idier, "Marginal estimation of aberrations and image restoration by use of phase diversity," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20, 1035-1045 (2003)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-20-6-1035


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. R. A. Gonsalves, “Phase retrieval and diversity in adaptive optics,” Opt. Eng. 21, 829–832 (1982).
  2. R. L. Kendrick, D. S. Acton, and A. L. Duncan, “Phase-diversity wave-front sensor for imaging systems,” Appl. Opt. 33, 6533–6546 (1994).
  3. D. J. Lee, M. C. Roggemann, B. M. Welsh, and E. R. Crosby, “Evaluation of least-squares phase-diversity technique for space telescope wave-front sensing,” Appl. Opt. 36, 9186–9197 (1997).
  4. M. G. Löfdahl and A. L. Duncan, “Fast phase diversity wavefront sensor for mirror control,” in Adaptative Optical System Technologies, D. Bonaccini and R. K. Tyson, eds., Proc. SPIE 3353, 952–963 (1998).
  5. M. G. Löfdahl and G. B. Scharmer, “Wavefront sensing and image restoration from focused and defocused solar images,” Astron. Astrophys. 107, 243–264 (1994).
  6. J. H. Seldin and R. G. Paxman, “Phase-diverse speckle reconstruction of solar data,” in Image Reconstruction and Restoration, T. J. Schulz and D. L. Snyder, eds., Proc. SPIE 2302, 268–280 (1994).
  7. B. J. Thelen, R. G. Paxman, D. A. Carrara, and J. H. Seldin, “Maximum a posteriori estimation of fixed aberrations, dynamic aberrations, and the object from phase-diverse speckle data,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 1016–1025 (1999).
  8. O. M. Bucci, A. Capozzoli, and G. D’Elia, “Regularizing strategy for image restoration and wave-front sensing by phase diversity,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 1759–1768 (1999).
  9. R. J. Noll, “Zernike polynomials and atmospheric turbulence,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66, 207–211 (1976).
  10. R. G. Paxman, T. J. Schulz, and J. R. Fienup, “Joint estimation of object and aberrations by using phase diversity,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 1072–1085 (1992).
  11. A. P. Kattnig and J. Primot, “Model of the second-order statistic of the radiance field of natural scenes, adapted to system conceiving,” in Visual Information Processing VI, S. K. Park and R. D. Juday, eds., Proc. SPIE 3074, 132–141 (1997).
  12. R. J. A. Little and D. B. Rubin, “On Jointly Estimating Parameters and Missing Data by Maximizing the Complete-Data Likelihood,” Am. Stat. 37, 218–220 (1983).
  13. Y. Goussard, G. Demoment, and J. Idier, “A new algorithm for iterative deconvolution of sparse spike,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, 1990), pp. 1547–1550.
  14. F. Champagnat and J. Idier, “An alternative to standard maximum likelihood for Gaussian mixtures,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, 1995), pp. 2020–2023.
  15. E. Lehmann, Theory of Point Estimation (Wiley, New York 1983).
  16. E. D. Carvalho and D. Slock, “Maximum-likelihood blind FIR multi-channel estimation with Gaussian prior for the symbols,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, 1997), pp. 3593–3596.
  17. L. Meynadier, V. Michau, M.-T. Velluet, J.-M. Conan, L. M. Mugnier, and G. Rousset, “Noise propagation in wave-front sensing with phase diversity,” Appl. Opt. 38, 4967–4979 (1999).
  18. J. Seldin and R. Paxman, “Closed-loop wavefront sensing for a sparse-aperture, phased-array telescope using broadband phase diversity,” in Imaging Technology and Telescopes, J. W. Bilbro, J. B. Breckinridge, R. A. Carreras, S. R. Czyzak, M. J. Eckart, R. D. Fiete, P. S. Idell, eds., Proc. SPIE 4091, 48–63 (2000).
  19. D. A. Carrara, B. J. Thelen and R. G. Paxman, “Aberration correction of segmented-aperture telescopes by using phase diversity,” in Image Reconstruction from Incomplete Data, M. A. Fiddy and R. P. Millane, eds., Proc. SPIE 4123, 56–63 (2000).
  20. O. N. Strand, “Theory and methods related to the singular-function expansion and Landweber’s iteration for integral equations of the first kind,” SIAM (Soc. Ind. Appl. Math.) J. Numer. Anal. 11, 798–825 (1974).
  21. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics (Pergamon, Oxford, U.K., 1983).
  22. F. R. Gantmacher, Théorie des Matrices Tome I (Dunod, Paris 1966).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited