OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 20, Iss. 6 — Jun. 1, 2003
  • pp: 1067–1083

Resolution of synthetic-aperture imaging through turbulence

Thomas J. Karr  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 20, Issue 6, pp. 1067-1083 (2003)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.20.001067


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (690 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

A theory is developed for the resolution of an optical synthetic-aperture imaging system viewing an object through an inhomogeneous refractive medium. The inhomogeneities of the propagation medium create errors in the phase history data with resultant space-variant image effects, including geometric distortions and broadening of the impulse response or point-spread function. I relate the intensity-impulse response to the usual wave structure function. I determine the modulation transfer function for synthetic apertures of any size and exposure time, valid whenever the optical bandwidth is small compared with the carrier frequency, and derive the resolution for monostatic and bistatic synthetic apertures, valid whenever the real sampling aperture is small compared with the medium’s coherence length. The results take the same form as the well-known turbulence-limited resolution of incoherent, real-aperture imaging with short exposure. Turbulence-limited synthetic-aperture resolution is somewhat better than incoherent real-aperture resolution under the same conditions. Autofocus processing improves synthetic-aperture resolution beyond this limit, and adaptive correction of higher-order phase history errors would improve it further.

© 2003 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(010.1300) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Atmospheric propagation
(030.1670) Coherence and statistical optics : Coherent optical effects
(030.6600) Coherence and statistical optics : Statistical optics
(110.2990) Imaging systems : Image formation theory
(110.4100) Imaging systems : Modulation transfer function
(280.6730) Remote sensing and sensors : Synthetic aperture radar

Citation
Thomas J. Karr, "Resolution of synthetic-aperture imaging through turbulence," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20, 1067-1083 (2003)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-20-6-1067


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. D. Park and J. H. Shapiro, “Performance analysis of optical synthetic aperture radars,” in Laser Radar III, R. J. Becherer, ed., Proc. SPIE 999, 100–116 (1989).
  2. S. Marcus, B. D. Colella, and T. J. Green, Jr., “Solid-state laser synthetic-aperture radar,” Appl. Opt. 33, 960–964 (1994).
  3. T. J. Green, Jr., S. Marcus, and B. D. Colella, “Synthetic-aperture-radar imaging with a solid-state laser,” Appl. Opt. 34, 6941–6949 (1995).
  4. S. Yoshikado and T. Aruga, “Short-range verification experiment of a trial one-dimensional synthetic aperture infrared laser radar operated in the 10-μm band,” Appl. Opt. 39, 1421–1425 (2000).
  5. C. C. Aleksoff, J. S. Accetta, L. M. Peterson, A. M. Tai, A. Klooster, K. S. Schroeder, R. M. Majewski, J. O. Abshier, and M. Fee, “Synthetic aperture imaging with a pulsed CO2 TEA laser,” in Laser Radar II, R. J. Becherer, R. C. Harney, eds., Proc. SPIE 783, 29–40 (1987).
  6. T. G. Kyle, “High resolution laser imaging system,” Appl. Opt. 28, 2651–2656 (1989).
  7. T. S. Lewis and H. S. Hutchins, “A synthetic aperture at 10.6 Microns,” Proc. IEEE 58, 1781–1782 (1970).
  8. M. Bashkansky, R. L. Lucke, E. Funk, L. J. Rickard, and J. Reintjes, “Two-dimensional synthetic aperture imaging in the optical domain,” Opt. Lett. 27, 1983–1985 (2002).
  9. C. V. Jakowatz, Jr., D. E. Wahl, P. H. Eichel, D. C. Ghiglia, and P. A. Thompson, Spotlight-Mode Synthetic Aperture Radar: A Signal Processing Approach (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1996).
  10. R. L. Lucke and L. J. Rickard, “Photon-limited synthetic-aperture imaging for planet surface studies,” Appl. Opt. 41, 5084–5095 (2002).
  11. D. L. Fried, “Optical resolution through a randomly inhomogeneous medium for very long and very short exposures,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 1372–1379 (1966).
  12. J. L. Walker, “Range-doppler imaging of rotating objects,” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. AES-16, 23–52 (1980).
  13. W. G. Carrara, R. S. Goodman, and R. M. Majewski, Spotlight Synthetic Aperture Radar Signal Processing Algorithms (Artech House, Norwood, Mass., 1995).
  14. If the real sampling aperture is moved over a curved surface, then the PHD represents the three-dimensional spatial Fourier spectrum of the target object.
  15. J. Way and E. A. Smith, “The evolution of synthetic aperture radar systems and their progression to the EOS SAR,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 29, 962–985 (1991).
  16. R. L. Jordan, B. L. Huneycutt, and M. Werner, “The SIR-C/X-SAR synthetic aperture radar system,” Proc. IEEE 79, 827–838 (1991).
  17. The projection is done along the arc of a circle with center at the center of the synthetic aperture.
  18. R. F. Lutomirski and H. T. Yura, “Propagation of a finite optical beam in an inhomogeneous medium,” Appl. Opt. 10, 1652–1658 (1971).
  19. H. T. Yura, “Signal-to-noise ratio of heterodyne lidar systems in the presence of atmospheric turbulence,” Opt. Acta 26, 627–644 (1979).
  20. R. G. Frehlich and M. J. Kavaya, “Coherent laser radar performance for general atmospheric refractive turbulence,” Appl. Opt. 30, 5325–5352 (1991).
  21. V. I. Tatarski, Wave Propagation in a Turbulent Medium (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1961).
  22. S. F. Clifford, “The classical theory of wave propagation in a turbulent medium,” in Laser Beam Propagation in the Atmosphere, J. W. Strohbehn, ed. (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1978), pp. 9–43.
  23. R. R. Beland, “Propagation through atmospheric turbulence,” in The Infrared and Electro-Optical Systems Handbook, Vol. 2, Fred G. Smith, ed. (Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, Bellingham, Wash., 1993), pp. 157–232.
  24. J. W. Goodman, Statistical Optics (Wiley, New York, 1985), pp. 361–464.
  25. G. R. Heibreider, “Image degradation with random wavefront tilt compensation,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. AP-15, 90–98 (1967).
  26. A. S. Monin and A. M. Yaglom, Statistical Fluid Mechanics: Mechanics of Turbulence (MIT, Cambridge, Mass., 1975), Vol. 2.
  27. A. Kolmogorov, “The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large reynolds mumbers,” in Turbulence, Classic Papers on Statistical Theory, S. K. Friedlander, L. Topper, eds. (Wiley, New York, 1961), pp. 151–155.
  28. We have chosen to chirp the local oscillator signal. This measurement process is known as dechirp-on-receive or stretch processing. The same result can be obtained by interfering sE(t) with a monochromatic optical wave and then dechirping the electronic beat signal from the optical detector either by mixing with a chirped electrical LO signal or by digital filtering.
  29. For a finite detector the interference signal is the convolution of the complex video signal with the detector impulse response backpropagated to the receiver entrance pupil.
  30. The circumflex always denotes a quantity defined for the sample as a whole, rather than at points in space.
  31. Walter G. Carrara, Ron S. Goodman, and Ronald M. Majewski, Spotlight Synthetic Aperture Radar Signal Processing Algorithms (Artech House, Norwood, Mass., 1995), pp. 501–506.
  32. We use the untapered domain in K space throughout this paper because it produces the narrowest possible IPR in image space (κ0≈0.886). Other tapering may be used with only minor changes in the analysis. In scan mode the impulse response usually is tapered by the reciprocal of the two-way antenna gain G(p, θ).
  33. The slant plane coordinates p of the scattering point are translated from its focus plane coordinates p0 by the layover, p=p0lp where the layover is δlp=h(p0)×(tanηe⁁x+tanψ e⁁r) for height h(p0) and tilt angle η. After removal of the carrier frequency, the scattering amplitude sp contains the height-dependent phase factor exp[i2k0(p⋅e⁁r+h(p0)tan η)].
  34. sinc(x)≡sin(πx)/πx.
  35. For any random variable α, the variance is Δα≡〈(α− 〈α〉)2〉.
  36. R. E. Hufnagel and N. R. Stanley, “Modulation transfer function associated with image transmission through turbulent media,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 54, 52–61 (1964).
  37. D∝|r|2 for |r|≤l0.
  38. D. L. Fried, “Limiting resolution looking down through the atmosphere,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 1380–1384 (1966).
  39. Robert A. Schmeltzer, “Means, variances, and covariances for laser beam propagation through a random medium,” Q. Appl. Math. 24, 339–354 (1967).
  40. This sometimes is called the down-looking r0 because it was introduced in the context of looking down at a point scatterer through the atmosphere from a space platform. But the definition, Eq. (2.25) in Ref. 38, is valid for any geometry (looking down, up, or horizontally) viewing a point scatterer. It differs from the coherence length of an infinite plane wave by the (ζ/R)5/3 factor in the integrand.
  41. rect(x)≡1 for |x|≤1/2, ≡0 for |x|>1/2.
  42. D. L. Fried, “Statistics of a geometric representation of wavefront distortion,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 55, 1427–1435 (1965).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited