## Local, hierarchic, and iterative reconstructors for adaptive optics

JOSA A, Vol. 20, Issue 6, pp. 1084-1093 (2003)

http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.20.001084

Acrobat PDF (303 KB)

### Abstract

Adaptive optics systems for future large optical telescopes may require thousands of sensors and actuators. Optimal reconstruction of phase errors using relative measurements requires feedback from every sensor to each actuator, resulting in computational scaling for <i>n</i> actuators of n<sup>2</sup>. The optimum local reconstructor is investigated, wherein each actuator command depends only on sensor information in a neighboring region. The resulting performance degradation on “global” modes is quantified analytically, and two approaches are considered for recovering global performance. Combining local and global estimators in a two-layer hierarchic architecture yields computations scaling with n<sup>4/3</sup>; extending this approach to multiple layers yields linear scaling. An alternative approach that maintains a local structure is to allow actuator commands to depend on both local sensors and prior local estimates. This iterative approach is equivalent to a temporal low-pass filter on global information and gives a scaling of n<sup>3/2</sup>. The algorithms are simulated by using data from the Palomar Observatory adaptive optics system. The analysis is general enough to also be applicable to active optics or other systems with many sensors and actuators.

© 2003 Optical Society of America

**OCIS Codes**

(010.1080) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Active or adaptive optics

(350.1260) Other areas of optics : Astronomical optics

**Citation**

Douglas G. MacMartin, "Local, hierarchic, and iterative reconstructors for adaptive optics," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A **20**, 1084-1093 (2003)

http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-20-6-1084

Sort: Year | Journal | Reset

### References

- J. W. Hardy, Adaptive Optics for Astronomical Telescopes, Oxford Series on Optical and Imaging Sciences 16 (Oxford U. Press, New York, 1998).
- R. Dekany, J. E. Nelson, and B. Bauman, “Design considerations for CELT adaptive optics,” in Optical Design, Materials, Fabrication, and Maintenance, P. Dierickx, ed., Proc. SPIE 4003, 212–225 (2000).
- J. Nelson and T. Mast, eds., “Conceptual design for a 30-meter telescope,” CELT Rep. 34 (University of California and California Institute of Technology, Berkeley, Calif., 2002).
- R. H. Hudgin, “Optimal wave-front estimation,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 67, 378–382 (1977).
- K. Freischlad and C. Zeiss, “Wavefront integration from difference data,” in Interferometry: Techniques and Analysis, G. M. Brown, O. Y. Kwon, M. Kujawinska, and G. T. Reid, eds., Proc. SPIE 1755, 212–218 (1992).
- L. A. Poyneer, D. T. Gavel, and J. M. Brase, “Fast wavefront reconstruction in large adaptive optics systems with use of the Fourier transform,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19, 2100–2111 (2002).
- B. L. Ellerbroek, “Efficient computation of minimum-variance wave-front reconstructors with sparse matrix techniques,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19, 1803–1816 (2002).
- L. Gilles, C. R. Vogel, and B. L. Ellerbroek, “Multigrid preconditioned conjugate-gradient method for large-scale wave-front reconstruction,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19, 1817–1822 (2002).
- W. J. Wild, E. J. Kibblewhite, and R. Vuilleumier, “Sparse matrix wave-front estimators for adaptive-optics systems for large ground-based telescopes,” Opt. Lett. 20, 955–957 (1995).
- T. P. Murphy, R. G. Lyon, J. E. Dorband, and J. M. Hollis, “Sparse matrix approximation method for an active optical control system,” Appl. Opt. 40, 6505–6514 (2001).
- K. Li, E. B. Kosmatopoulos, P. A. Ioannou, and H. Ryaciotaki-Boussalis, “Large segmented telescopes: centralized, decentralized and overlapping control designs,” IEEE Control Syst. Mag., October 2000, 59–72.
- R. D’Andrea, C. Langbort, and R. Chandra, “A state space approach to control of interconnected systems,” in Mathematical Systems Theory in Biology, Communication, Computation and Finance, IMA Vol. 134 in Mathematics and Its Application, J. Rosenthal and D. S. Gillian, eds. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2003), pp. 157–182.
- D. M. Young, Iterative Solution of Large Linear Systems (Academic, New York, 1971).
- F. Shi, D. G. MacMartin, M. Troy, G. L. Brack, R. S. Burruss, and R. G. Dekany, “Sparse matrix wavefront reconstruction: simulations and experiments,” in Adaptive Optical System Technologies II, P. L. Wizinowich and D. Bonaccini, eds., Proc. SPIE 4839, 1035–1044 (2002).
- M. Troy, R. Dekany, G. Brack, B. Oppenheimer, E. Bloemhof, T. Trinh, F. Dekens, F. Shi, T. Hayward, and B. Brandl, “Palomar adaptive optics project: status and performance,” in Adaptive Optical Systems Technology, P. L. Wizinowich, ed., Proc. SPIE 4007, 31–40 (2000).
- J.-P. Gaffard and G. Ledanois, “Adaptive optics transfer function modeling,” in Active and Adaptive Optical Systems, M. A. Ealey, ed., Proc. SPIE 1542, 34–45 (1991).
- R. J. Noll, “Zernike polynomials and atmospheric turbulence,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66, 207–211 (1976).
- T. Truong, G. Brack, T. Trinh, M. Troy, F. Shi, and R. G. Dekany, “Real-time wavefront processors for the next generation of adaptive optics systems: a design and analysis,” in Adaptive Optical System Technologies II, P. L. Wizinowich and D. Bonaccini, eds., Proc. SPIE 4839, 911–922 (2002).

## Cited By |
Alert me when this paper is cited |

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article | Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.