OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 21, Iss. 11 — Nov. 1, 2004
  • pp: 2061–2064

On the optical theory of underwater vision in humans

Anna Gislén and Lars Gislén  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 21, Issue 11, pp. 2061-2064 (2004)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.21.002061


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (251 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Defocus changes the visual contrast sensitivity function, thereby creating a complex curve with local dips and peaks. Since underwater vision in humans is severely defocused, we used optical theory and the phenomenon of spurious resolution to predict how well humans can see in this environment. The values obtained correspond well with experimental measurements of underwater human acuity from earlier studies and even point to an opportunity for humans with exceptional contrast sensitivity to see better underwater than the children in those studies. The same theory could be useful when discussing the visual acuity of amphibious animals, as they may use pupil constriction as a means of improving underwater vision.

© 2004 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(110.4100) Imaging systems : Modulation transfer function
(330.1070) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision - acuity
(330.1800) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision - contrast sensitivity
(330.4060) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision modeling
(330.7320) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision adaptation

History
Original Manuscript: October 13, 2003
Revised Manuscript: June 2, 2004
Manuscript Accepted: June 2, 2004
Published: November 1, 2004

Citation
Anna Gislén and Lars Gislén, "On the optical theory of underwater vision in humans," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 21, 2061-2064 (2004)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-21-11-2061


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. W. J. Smith, Modern Optical Engineering (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966).
  2. N. C. Strang, D. A. Atchinson, R. L. Woods, “Effects of defocus and pupil size on human contrast sensitivity,” Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 19, 415–426 (1999). [CrossRef]
  3. R. L. Woods, N. C. Strang, D. A. Atchison, “Measuring contrast sensitivity with inappropriate optical correction,” Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 20, 442–451 (2000). [PubMed]
  4. A. Gislén, M. Dacke, R. H. H. Kröger, M. Abrahamson, D.-E. Nilsson, E. J. Warrant, “Superior underwater vision in a human population of sea-gypsies,” Curr. Biol. 13, 833–836 (2003). [CrossRef]
  5. A. Gislén, E. J. Warrant, R. H. H. Kröger, “Voluntary accommodation improves underwater vision in humans,” manuscript available from the authors (anna.gislen@cob.lu.se).
  6. A. Bradley, R. D. Freeman, “Contrast sensitivity in children,” Vision Res. 22, 953–959 (1982). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. L. A. Olzak, J. P. Thomas, “Seeing spatial patterns,” in Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, J. P. Thomas, eds. (Wiley, New York, 1986), Chap. 7.
  8. J. Gwiazda, J. Bauer, F. Thorn, R. Held, “Development of spatial contrast sensitivity from infancy to adulthood: psychophysical data,” Optom. Vision Sci. 74, 785–789 (1997). [CrossRef]
  9. F. W. Campbell, J. G. Robson, “The application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings,” J. Physiol. (London) 197, 551–566 (1968).
  10. K. K. De Valois, “Spatial frequency adaptation can enhance contrast sensitivity,” Vision Res. 17, 1057–1065 (1977). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. P. T. Sowden, I. R. L. Davies, P. Roling, “Perceptual learning of the detection of features in X-ray images: a functional role for improvement in adults’ visual sensitivity?” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 26, 379–390 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. P. T. Sowden, D. Rose, I. R. L. Davies, “Perceptual learning of luminance contrast detection: specific for spatial frequency and retinal location but not orientation,” Vision Res. 42, 1249–1258 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. A. Gislén, M. Dacke, “A simple way to assess contrast sensitivity in children living in remote areas,” manuscript available from the authors (anna.gislen@cob.lu.se).
  14. H. Davson, Physiology of the Eye, 5th ed. (MacMillan, London, 1990), p. 830.
  15. E. Marg, M. W. Morgan, “The pupillary near reflex,” Am. J. Optom. Arch. Am. Acad. Optom. 26, 183–198 (1949). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. F. Schaeffel, H. Wilhelm, E. Zrenner, “Inter-individual variability in the dynamics of natural accommodation in humans: relation to age and refractive errors,” J. Physiol. (London) 461, 301–320 (1993).
  17. N. Roth, “Effect of reduced retinal illuminance on the pupillary near reflex,” Vision Res. 9, 1259–1266 (1969). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. J. G. Sivak, “A survey of vertebrate strategies for vision in air and water,” in Sensory Ecology, M. A. Ali, ed. (Plenum, New York, 1978), pp. 503–519.
  19. L. Herman, M. F. Peacock, M. P. Yunker, C. J. Madsen, “Bottlenose dolphin: double-slit pupil yields equivalent aerial and underwater diurnal activity,” Science 189, 650–652 (1975). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. L. A. Rivamonte, “Eye model to account for comparable aerial and underwater acuities of the bottlenose dolphin,” Neth. J. Sea Res. 10, 491–498 (1976). [CrossRef]
  21. F. Schaeffel, “Underwater vision in semi-aquatic European snakes,” Naturwissenschaften 78, 373–375 (1991). [CrossRef]
  22. F. Schaeffel, A. De Queiroz, “Alternative mechanisms of enhanced underwater vision in the Garter snakes Thamnopsis melanogaster and T. couchii,” Copeia 1, 50–58 (1990). [CrossRef]
  23. F. Thorn, F. Schwartz, “Effects of dioptric blur on Snellen and grating acuity,” Optom. Vision Sci. 67, 3–7 (1990). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited