OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 21, Iss. 12 — Dec. 1, 2004
  • pp: 2269–2275

Relative significance of the terms in the CIEDE2000 and CIE94 color-difference formulas

Manuel Melgosa, Rafael Huertas, and Roy S. Berns  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 21, Issue 12, pp. 2269-2275 (2004)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.21.002269


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (322 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

CIELAB-based color-difference formulas are used to improve the prediction of visually perceived color differences through the introduction of various corrections to CIELAB. In our study we analyze the relative importance of these corrections. From the combined dataset employed for the development of CIEDE2000, we found that the improvement of CIE94 over CIELAB was considerably greater than that of CIEDE2000 over CIE94. Chroma-difference correction was the most important correction in both CIE94 and CIEDE2000. With an arbitrary value of 100 assigned to this correction, the score of the hue-difference correction in CIE94 was 21, and the scores of the four remaining corrections in CIEDE2000 were as follows: hue difference, 29; rotation term, 8; lightness difference, 8; and gray correction, 6. At 95% confidence level each of the corrections introduced in CIEDE2000 or CIE94 was statistically significant for the whole combined dataset, in agreement with the results reported by CIE TC 1-47 and 1-29. For the combined dataset, the differences between CMC and CIEDE2000 were found to be statistically significant at 95% confidence level, but the differences between CMC and CIE94 were not. From subsets of the combined dataset it was concluded that further analyses of the lightness-difference and gray corrections proposed by CIEDE2000 would be desirable, using new experimental data.

© 2004 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.1690) Vision, color, and visual optics : Color
(330.1710) Vision, color, and visual optics : Color, measurement
(330.1720) Vision, color, and visual optics : Color vision
(330.1730) Vision, color, and visual optics : Colorimetry

History
Original Manuscript: February 6, 2004
Revised Manuscript: June 7, 2004
Manuscript Accepted: June 7, 2004
Published: December 1, 2004

Citation
Manuel Melgosa, Rafael Huertas, and Roy S. Berns, "Relative significance of the terms in the CIEDE2000 and CIE94 color-difference formulas," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 21, 2269-2275 (2004)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-21-12-2269


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. , “Industrial colour-difference evaluation” (CIE Central Bureau, Vienna, 1995).
  2. , “Improvement to industrial colour-difference evaluation” (CIE Central Bureau, Vienna, 2001).
  3. R. S. Berns, “The mathemathical development of CIE TC 1-29 proposed color difference equation: CIELCH,” in Proceedings of AIC Colour 93, Budapest, 1993, Vol. B, pp. 189–192; http://www.aic-colour.org .
  4. L. D. Griffin, A. Sepehri, “Performance of CIE94 for nonreference conditions,” Color Res. Appl. 27, 108–115 (2002). [CrossRef]
  5. G. M. Johnson, M. D. Fairchild, “A top down description of S-CIELAB and CIEDE2000,” Color Res. Appl. 28, 425–435 (2003). [CrossRef]
  6. R. G. Kuehni, “CIEDE2000, milestone or final answer?” Color Res. Appl. 27, 126–127 (2002). [CrossRef]
  7. M. R. Luo, G. Cui, B. Rigg, “Further comments on CIEDE2000,” Color Res. Appl. 27, 127–128 (2002). [CrossRef]
  8. G. Cui, M. R. Luo, B. Rigg, G. Roesler, K. Witt, “Uniform colour spaces based on the DIN99 colour-difference formula,” Color Res. Appl. 27, 282–290 (2002). [CrossRef]
  9. C. Oleari, “Color opponencies in the system of the uniform color scales of the Optical Society of America,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 21, 677–682 (2004). [CrossRef]
  10. M. R. Luo, G. Cui, B. Rigg, “The development of CIE 2000 colour-difference formula: CIEDE2000,” Color Res. Appl. 26, 340–350 (2001). [CrossRef]
  11. M. R. Luo, B. Rigg, “Chromaticity-discrimination ellipses for surface colours,” Color Res. Appl. 11, 25–42 (1986). [CrossRef]
  12. D. H. Kim, J. H. Nobbs, “New weighting functions for the weighted CIELAB colour difference formula,” in Proceedings of AIC Colour 97, Kyoto, 1997, Vol. 1, pp. 446–449; http://www.aic-colour.org .
  13. R. S. Berns, D. H. Alman, L. Reniff, G. D. Snyder, M. R. Balonon-Rosen, “Visual determination of suprathreshold color-difference tolerances using probit analysis,” Color Res. Appl. 16, 297–316 (1991). [CrossRef]
  14. K. Witt, “Geometric relations between scales of small colour differences,” Color Res. Appl. 24, 78–92 (1999). [CrossRef]
  15. Y. Qiao, R. S. Berns, L. Reniff, E. Montag, “Visual determination of hue suprathreshold color-difference tolerances,” Color Res. Appl. 23, 302–313 (1998). [CrossRef]
  16. R. S. Berns, “Derivation of a hue-angle dependent, hue-difference weighting function for CIEDE2000,” in Proceedings AIC Color 01, Rochester N.Y., 2001, pp. 638–641; http://www.aic-colour.org .
  17. S. S. Guan, M. R. Luo, “Investigation of parametric effects using small colour-differences,” Color Res. Appl. 24, 331–343 (1999). [CrossRef]
  18. F. J. J. Clarke, R. McDonald, B. Rigg, “Modification to the JPC79 colour-difference formula,” J. Soc. Dyers Colour. 100, 128–132 (1984). [CrossRef]
  19. H. B. Mann, D. R. Whitney, “On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other,” Ann. Math. Stat. 18, 50–60 (1947). [CrossRef]
  20. R. McDonald, “Industrial pass/fail colour matching. Part 3: colour-matching formulas,” J. Soc. Dyers Colour. 96, 486–497 (1980). [CrossRef]
  21. M. R. Luo, B. Rigg, “BFD(l:c) colour-difference formula. Part 1—development of the formula,” J. Soc. Dyers Colour. 103, 86–94 (1987). [CrossRef]
  22. R. S. Berns, Billmeyer and Satzman’s Principles of Color Technology, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York, 2000), Chap. 4.
  23. R. McDonald, “The effect of non-uniformity in ANLAB colour space on the interpretation of visual colour differences,” J. Soc. Dyers Colour. 90, 189–198 (1974). [CrossRef]
  24. M. Melgosa, E. Hita, A. J. Poza, M. M. Pérez, “The weighting function for lightness in the CIE94 color-difference model,” Color Res. Appl. 21, 347–352 (1996). [CrossRef]
  25. E. Coates, K. Y. Fong, B. Rigg, “Uniform lightness scales,” J. Soc. Dyers Colour. 97, 179–183 (1981). [CrossRef]
  26. W. Schultze, “The usefulness of colour-difference formulas for fixing colour tolerances,” in Proceedings AIC/Holland, Soesterberg, The Netherlands, 1972, pp. 254–265; http://www.aic-colour.org .

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited