OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 21, Iss. 7 — Jul. 1, 2004
  • pp: 1261–1276

Optimal control law for classical and multiconjugate adaptive optics

Brice Le Roux, Jean-Marc Conan, Caroline Kulcsár, Henri-François Raynaud, Laurent M. Mugnier, and Thierry Fusco  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 21, Issue 7, pp. 1261-1276 (2004)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.21.001261


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (282 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Classical adaptive optics (AO) is now a widespread technique for high-resolution imaging with astronomical ground-based telescopes. It generally uses simple and efficient control algorithms. Multiconjugate adaptive optics (MCAO) is a more recent and very promising technique that should extend the corrected field of view. This technique has not yet been experimentally validated, but simulations already show its high potential. The importance for MCAO of an optimal reconstruction using turbulence spatial statistics has already been demonstrated through open-loop simulations. We propose an optimal closed-loop control law that accounts for both spatial and temporal statistics. The prior information on the turbulence, as well as on the wave-front sensing noise, is expressed in a state-space model. The optimal phase estimation is then given by a Kalman filter. The equations describing the system are given and the underlying assumptions explained. The control law is then derived. The gain brought by this approach is demonstrated through MCAO numerical simulations representative of astronomical observation on a 8-m-class telescope in the near infrared. We also discuss the application of this control approach to classical AO. Even in classical AO, the technique could be relevant especially for future extreme AO systems.

© 2004 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(010.1080) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Active or adaptive optics
(010.1330) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Atmospheric turbulence
(070.6020) Fourier optics and signal processing : Continuous optical signal processing
(100.3190) Image processing : Inverse problems

Citation
Brice Le Roux, Jean-Marc Conan, Caroline Kulcsár, Henri-François Raynaud, Laurent M. Mugnier, and Thierry Fusco, "Optimal control law for classical and multiconjugate adaptive optics," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 21, 1261-1276 (2004)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-21-7-1261


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. R. Dicke, “Phase-contrast detection of telescope seeing errors and their correction,” Astrophys. J. 198, 605–615 (1975).
  2. J. Beckers, “Increasing the size of the isoplanatic patch with multiconjugate adaptive optics,” in Very Large Telescopes and Their Instrumentation, M.-H. Ulrich, ed., Vol. 2 of ESO Conference and Workshop Proceedings (European Southern Observatory, Garching, Germany, 1988), pp. 693–703.
  3. M. Tallon, R. Foy, and J. Vernin, “3-d wavefront sensing and multiconjugate adaptive optics,” in Progress in Telescope and Instrumentation Technologies (M.-H. Ulrich, ed., Vol. 42 of ESO Conference and Workshop Proceedings (European Southern Observatory, Garching, Germany, 1992), pp. 517–521.
  4. B. L. Ellerbroek, “First-order performance evaluation of adaptive-optics systems for atmospheric-turbulence compensation in extended-field-of-view astronomical telescopes,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 783–805 (1994).
  5. T. Fusco, J.-M. Conan, V. Michau, L. Mugnier, and G. Rousset, “Efficient phase estimation for large-field-of-view adaptive optics,” Opt. Lett. 24, 1472–1474 (1999).
  6. T. Fusco, J.-M. Conan, G. Rousset, L. Mugnier, and V. Michau, “Optimal wave-front reconstruction strategies for multiconjugate adaptive optics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 2527–2538 (2001).
  7. M. Le Louarn, “Étoiles laser pour les grands télescopes: effet de cône et implications astrophysiques,” Ph.D. thesis (Université Lyon I–Claude Bernard, Lyon, France, 2000).
  8. R. Ragazzoni, E. Marchetti, and F. Rigaut, “Modal tomography for adaptive optics,” Astron. Astrophys. 342, 53–56 (1999).
  9. R. Ragazzoni, “No laser guide stars for adaptive optics in giant telescopes,” Astron. Astrophys., Suppl. Ser. 136, 205–209 (1999).
  10. F. Rigaut, B. Ellerbroek, and R. Flicker, “Principles, limitations and performance of multi-conjugate adaptive optics,” in Adaptive Optical Systems Technology, P. L. Wizinowich, ed., Proc. SPIE 4007, 1022–1031 (2000).
  11. A. Tokovinin, M. Le Louarn, and M. Sarazin, “Isoplanatism in a multiconjugate adaptive optics system,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17, 1819–1827 (2000).
  12. E. Gendron and P. Léna, “Astronomical adaptive optics I. Modal control optimization,” Astron. Astrophys. 291, 337–347 (1994).
  13. E. Gendron and P. Léna, “Astronomical adaptive optics II. Experimental results of an optimize modal control,” Astron. Astrophys. 111, 153–167 (1994).
  14. C. Dessenne, P.-Y. Madec, and G. Rousset, “Optimization of a predictive controller for closed-loop adaptive optics,” Appl. Opt. 37, 4623–4633 (1998).
  15. B. L. Ellerbroek and T. A. Rhoadarmer, “Optimizing the performance of closed-loop adaptive-optics control systems on the basis of experimentally measured performance data,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 1975–1987 (1997).
  16. B. L. Ellerbroek and T. A. Rhoadarmer, “Adaptive wavefront control algorithms for closed loop adaptive optics,” Math. Comput. Model. 33, 145–158 (2001).
  17. H. Van Trees, Detection, Estimation and Modulation Theory, Part I (Wiley, New York, 1968).
  18. A. Papoulis, Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1991).
  19. B. Anderson and J. Moore, Optimal Control, Linear Quadratic Methods (Prentice Hall, London, 1990).
  20. R. Paschall and D. Anderson, “Linear quadratic Gaussian control of a deformable mirror adaptive optics system with time-delayed measurements,” Appl. Opt. 32, 6347–6358 (1993).
  21. D. Gavel and D. Wiberg, “Toward Strehl-optimizing adaptive optics controllers,” in Adaptive Optical System Technologies II, P. L. Wizinowich, ed., Proc. SPIE 4839, 890–901 (2002).
  22. P.-Y. Madec, “Control techniques,” in Adaptive Optics in Astronomy, F. Roddier, ed. (Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999), Chap. 6, pp. 131–154. See also Ref. 23.
  23. F. Roddier, ed., Adaptive Optics in Astronomy (Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999).
  24. M. Séchaud, “Wave-front compensation devices,” in Adaptive Optics in Astronomy, F. Roddier, ed., (Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999), Chap. 4, pp. 57–90. See also Ref. 23.
  25. T. Fusco, J.-M. Conan, V. Michau, and G. Rousset, “Noise propagation for multiconjugate adaptive optics systems,” in Optics in Atmospheric Propagation and Adaptive Systems IV, A. Kohnle, J. D. Gonglewski, and T. J. Schmugge, eds., Proc. SPIE 4538, 144–155 (2002).
  26. M. Le Louarn, “Multiconjugate adaptive optics: a PSF study,” in Beyond Conventional Adaptive Optics, S. Esposito and R. Ragazzoni, eds., Vol. 58 of ESO Conference and Workshop Proceedings (European Southern Observatory, Garching, Germany, 2001), pp. 217–222.
  27. E. Diolaiti, C. Arcidiacono, R. Ragazzoni, and E. Fedrigo, “Identification and rejection of waffle modes in layer-oriented adaptive optics,” in Adaptive Optical System Technologies II, P. L. Wizinowich, ed., Proc. SPIE 4839, 1001–1010 (2003).
  28. R. Flicker, F. Rigaut, and B. Ellerbroek, “Comparison of multiconjugate adaptive optics configurations and control algorithms for the gemini-south 8-m telescope,” in Adaptive Optical Systems Technology, W. Bellingham, ed., Vol. 4007 of ESO Conference and Workshop Proceedings (European Southern Observatory, Garching, Germany, 2000), pp. 1032–1043.
  29. T. Fusco, J.-M. Conan, V. Michau, G. Rousset, and F. Assémat, “Multi-conjugate adaptive optics: comparison of phase reconstruction approaches for large field of view,” in Optics in Atmospheric Propagation and Adaptive Systems VI, P. L. Wizinowich, ed., Proc. SPIE 4167, 168–179 (2001).
  30. T. Fusco, J.-M. Conan, V. Michau, G. Rousset, and L. Mugnier, “Isoplanatic angle and optimal guide star separation for multiconjugate adaptive optics,” in Adaptive Optical Systems Technology, P. L. Wizinowich, ed., Proc. SPIE 4007, 1044–1055 (2000).
  31. J.-M. Conan, G. Rousset, and P.-Y. Madec, “Wave-front temporal spectra in high-resolution imaging through turbulence,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12, 1559–1570 (1995).
  32. E. Gendron, “Optimisation de la commande modale en optique adaptative: application à l’astronomie,” Ph.D. thesis (Université Paris VII, Paris, 1995).
  33. G. Rousset, F. Lacombe, P. Puget, E. Gendron, N. Hubin, G. Zins, E. Stadler, J. Charton, P. Gigan, and P. Feautrier, “Status of the VLT Nasmyth Adaptive Optics System (NAOS),” in Adaptive Optical Systems Technology, P. L. Wizinowich, ed., Proc. SPIE 4007, 72–81 (2000).
  34. C. Dessenne, “Commande modale et prédictive en optique adaptative classique,” Ph.D. thesis (Université Paris VII, Paris, 1998).
  35. T. Fusco, “Correction partielle et anisoplanetisme en optique adaptive: traitements a posteriori et optique adaptative multiconjuguée,” Ph.D. thesis (Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis, Nice, France, 2000).
  36. P. S. Maybeck, Stochastic Models, Estimation and Control, Vol. 3 (Academic, New York, 1982).
  37. B. McGlamery, “Computer simulation studies of compensation of turbulence degraded images,” in Image Processing, J. C. Urbach, ed., Proc. SPIE 74, 225–233 (1976).
  38. F. Roddier, M. J. Northcott, J.-E. Graves, D. L. McKenna, and D. Roddier, “One-dimensional spectra of turbulence-induced Zernike aberrations: time-delay and isoplanicity error in partial adaptive optics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 957–965 (1993).
  39. P.-Y. Madec, J.-M. Conan, and G. Rousset, “Temporal characterisation of atmospheric wavefront for adaptive optics,” in Progress in Telescope and Instrumentation Technologies, M.-H. Ulrich, ed., Vol. 42 of ESO Conference and Workshop Proceedings, (European Southern Observatory, Garching, Germany, 1992), pp. 471–474.
  40. G. Rousset, “Wave-front sensors,” Adaptive Optics in Astronomy, F. Roddier, ed. (Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999), Chap. 5, pp. 119, para. 5.5.2. See also Ref. 23.
  41. F. Rigaut and E. Gendron, “Laser guide star in adaptive optics: the tilt determination problem,” Astron. Astrophys. 261, 677–684 (1992).
  42. J.-M. Conan, “Etude de la correction partielle en optique adaptative,” Ph.D. thesis (Université Paris XI, Paris, 1994).
  43. R. Noll, “Zernike polynomials and atmospheric turbulence,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66, 207–211 (1976).
  44. J.-M. Conan, B. Le Roux, D. Bello, T. Fusco, and G. Rousset, “Multiconjugate adaptive optics: performance with optimal wavefront reconstruction,” in Beyond Conventional Adaptive Optics, S. Esposito and R. Ragazzoni, eds., Vol. 58 of ESO Conference and Workshop Proceedings (European Southern Observatory, Garching, Germany, 2001), pp. 209–215.
  45. N. Hubin, E. Marchetti, E. Fedrigo, R. Conan, R. Ragazzoni, E. Diolaiti, M. Tordi, G. Rousset, T. Fusco, P.-Y. Madec, D. Butler, S. Hippler, and S. Esposito, “The ESO MCAO demonstrator MAD: a European collaboration,” in Beyond Conventional Adaptive Optics, S. Esposito and R. Ragazzoni, eds., Vol. 58 of ESO Conference and Workshop Proceedings (European Southern Observatory, Garching, Germany, 2001), pp. 27–35.
  46. E. Vernet-Viard, R. Ragazzoni, C. Arcidiacono, A. Baruffolo, E. Diolaiti, J. Farinato, E. Fedrigo, E. Marchetti, R. Fa- lomo, S. Esposito, M. Carbillet, and C. Vérinaud, “Layer oriented wavefront sensor for mad: status and progress,” in Adaptive Optical System Technologies II, D. Bonaccini and P. L. Wizinowich, eds., Proc. SPIE 4839, 344–353 (2003).
  47. F. Rigaut, M. Chun, B. Ellerbroek, and C. D’Orgeville, “MCAO for Gemini South,” in Conceptual Design Review Documents, MCAO Conceptual Design Documentation, 2000; http://www.gemini.edu/sciops/instruments/adaptiveOptics/AOIndex.html.
  48. F. Hammer, F. Sayède, E. Gendron, T. Fusco, D. Burgarella, V. Cayatte, J.-M. Conan, F. Courbin, H. Flores, I. Guinouard, Jocou, A. Lançon, G. Monnet, M. Mouhcine, F. Rigaud, D. Rouan, G. Rousset, V. Buat, and F. Zamkotsian, “The FALCON concept: multi-object spectroscopy combined with MCAO in near-IR,” in Scientific Drivers for ESO Future VLT/VLTI, Vol. 42 of ESO Conference and Workshop Proceedings (European Southern Observatory, Garching, Germany, 2002), p. 139.
  49. F. Assémat, F. Hammer, E. Gendron, F. Sayède, P. Laporte, M. Marteaud, M. Puech, J.-M. Conan, T. Fusco, and F. Zamkotsian, “FALCON: a new-generation spectrograph with adaptive optics for the ESO VLT,” in Optics in Atmospheric Propagation and Adaptive Systems VI, J. D. Gonglewski and K. Stein, eds., Proc. SPIE 5237, 211–222 (2004).
  50. B. A. Macintosh, S. Olivier, B. Bauman, J. Brase, E. Carr, C. Carrano, D. T. Gavel, C. E. Max, and J. Patience, “Practical high-order adaptive optics systems for extrasolar planet searches,” in Adaptive Optical Systems and Technologies II, M. C. Roggeman, R. K. Tyson, and D. Bonaccini, eds., Proc. SPIE 4494, 60–68 (2002).
  51. D. Mouillet, A.-M. Lagrange, J.-L. Beuzit, F. Ménard, C. Moutou, T. Fusco, L. Abé, T. Gillot, R. Soummer, and P. Riaud, “VLT planet finder: specifications for a ground-based high contrast imager,” in Scientific Highlights 2002, F. Combes and D. Barret, eds. (EDP Sciences, Société Française d’Astronomie et d’Astrophysique, Les Ulis, France, 2002).
  52. D. Mouillet, T. Fusco, A.-M. Lagrange, and J.-L. Beuzit, “‘Planet finder’ on the VLT: context, goals and critical specifications, for adaptive optics,” in Astronomy with High Contrast Imaging, C. Aime and R. Soummer, eds., Vol. 8 of EAS Publications Series (European Astronomical Society, Petit-Lancy 2, Switzerland, 2002), pp. 193–199.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited