OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 22, Iss. 8 — Aug. 1, 2005
  • pp: 1637–1645

Design of reflection retarders by use of nonnegative film–substrate systems

A. R.M. Zaghloul, D. A. Keeling, W. A. Berzett, and J. S. Mason  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 22, Issue 8, pp. 1637-1645 (2005)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.22.001637


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (208 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

A reflection-type film–substrate retarder is an optical device that changes the relative phase but not the relative amplitude of light upon reflection from a film–substrate system. While there are several such device designs based on the common negative film–substrate system, very little has been done with the other two categories of systems, zero and positive. The system category is determined by the relationship between the refractive indices of the ambient N 0 , film N 1 , and substrate N 2 . If N 1 < N 0 N 2 , the system is negative; if N 1 = N 0 N 2 , the system is zero; and if N 1 > N 0 N 2 , the system is positive. The design procedure and characteristics of zero-system reflection retarders are discussed. The polarization and ellipsometric properties of the positive system preclude the existence of a reflection retarder. First, a brief characterization of the zero and positive systems by means of constant-angle-of-incidence contours and constant-thickness contours of the ellipsometric function is presented and discussed. Then an algorithm outlining the design procedures is presented, and the characteristics of the obtained designs are optimized, analyzed, and discussed. The exact retarder is valid for a single wavelength at a set angle of incidence. The design tolerance to changes in the design parameters is analyzed and discussed. In general, N 1 N 1 N 2 is the condition to be satisfied to realize reflection-type retarders with film–substrate systems.

© 2005 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(230.5440) Optical devices : Polarization-selective devices
(240.0310) Optics at surfaces : Thin films
(260.5430) Physical optics : Polarization
(310.1620) Thin films : Interference coatings

History
Original Manuscript: August 10, 2004
Revised Manuscript: February 1, 2005
Manuscript Accepted: February 3, 2005
Published: August 1, 2005

Citation
A. R.M. Zaghloul, D. A. Keeling, W. A. Berzett, and J. S. Mason, "Design of reflection retarders by use of nonnegative film–substrate systems," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 22, 1637-1645 (2005)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-22-8-1637


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. S. Kawabata, M. Suzuki, “MgF2-Ag tunable reflection retarder,” Appl. Opt. 19, 484–485 (1980). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. R. M.A. Azzam, A. R.M. Zaghloul, N. M. Bashara, “Ellipsometric function of a film–substrate system: applications to the design of reflection-type optical devices and to ellipsometry,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 65, 252–260 (1975). [CrossRef]
  3. A. R.M. Zaghloul, R. M.A. Azzam, N. M. Bashara, “Design of film–substrate single-reflection retarders,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 65, 1043–1049 (1975). [CrossRef]
  4. R. M.A. Azzam, M. EmdadurRahman Khan, “Single-reflection film–substrate half-wave retarders with nearly stationary reflection properties over a wide range of incidence angles,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 73, 160–166 (1983). [CrossRef]
  5. M. S.A. Yousef, A. R.M. Zaghloul, “Ellipsometric function of a film–substrate system: characterization and detailed study,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 6, 355–366 (1989). [CrossRef]
  6. A. R.M. Zaghloul, M. S.A. Yousef, “Unified analysis and representation of category-dependent film-thickness behavior of the ellipsometric function of film–substrate system,” submitted to Appl. Opt.
  7. A. R.M. Zaghloul, M. S.A. Yousef, “Ellipsometric function of a film–substrate system: detailed analysis and closed-form inversion,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 2029–2044 (1999). [CrossRef]
  8. A PPD was recognized in Ref. [9], without derivation through the CAICs and CTCs of the system.
  9. R. M.A. Azzam, “Simultaneous reflection and refraction of light without change of polarization by a single-layer-coated dielectric surface,” Opt. Lett. 10, 107–109 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. B. Van Zeghbroeck, Principles of Semiconductor Devices (Van Zeghbroeck, 2004) ece-www.colorado.edu/∼bart/book.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited