OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 22, Iss. 9 — Sep. 1, 2005
  • pp: 1952–1967

Extending the Clapper–Yule model to rough printing supports

Mathieu Hébert and Roger David Hersch  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 22, Issue 9, pp. 1952-1967 (2005)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.22.001952


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (610 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The Clapper–Yule model is the only classical spectral reflection model for halftone prints that takes explicitly into account both the multiple internal reflections between the print–air interface and the paper substrate and the lateral propagation of light within the paper bulk. However, the Clapper–Yule model assumes a planar interface and does not take into account the roughness of the print surface. In order to extend the Clapper–Yule model to rough printing supports (e.g., matte coated papers or calendered papers), we model the print surface as a set of randomly oriented microfacets. The influence of the shadowing effect is evaluated and incorporated into the model. By integrating over all incident angles and facet orientations, we are able to express the internal reflectance of the rough interface as a function of the rms facet slope. By considering also the rough interface transmittances both for the incident light and for the emerging light, we obtain a generalization of the Clapper–Yule model for rough interfaces. The comparison between the classical Clapper–Yule model and the model extended to rough surfaces shows that the influence of the surface roughness on the predicted reflectance factor is small. For high-quality papers such as coated and calendered papers, as well as for low-quality papers such as newsprint or copy papers, the influence of surface roughness is negligible, and the classical Clapper–Yule model can be used to predict the halftone-print reflectance factors. The influence of roughness becomes significant only for very rough and thick nondiffusing coatings.

© 2005 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(080.2710) Geometric optics : Inhomogeneous optical media
(100.2810) Image processing : Halftone image reproduction
(160.0160) Materials : Materials
(240.5770) Optics at surfaces : Roughness
(330.1710) Vision, color, and visual optics : Color, measurement

History
Original Manuscript: October 13, 2004
Revised Manuscript: January 28, 2005
Manuscript Accepted: February 9, 2005
Published: September 1, 2005

Citation
Mathieu Hébert and Roger David Hersch, "Extending the Clapper–Yule model to rough printing supports," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 22, 1952-1967 (2005)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-22-9-1952


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. J. Yule, W. Nielsen, “The penetration of light into paper and its effect on halftone reproductions,” in Proceedings of the Technical Association of the Graphic Arts (TAGA) Conference, 1951, pp. 65–76. http://www.taga.org.
  2. J. A. S. Viggiano, “Modeling the color of multi-color halftones,” in Proceedings of the Technical Association of the Graphic Arts (TAGA) Conference, 1990, pp. 44–62. http://www.taga.org.
  3. R. Balasubramanian, “Optimization of the spectral Neugebauer model for printer characterization,” J. Electron. Imaging 8, 156–166 (1999). [CrossRef]
  4. K. Iino, R. S. Berns, “Building color management modules using linear optimization I. Desktop,” J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 41, 79–94 (1998).
  5. K. Iino, R. S. Berns, “Building color management modules using linear optimization II. Prepress system for offset printing,” J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 42, 99–114 (1998).
  6. F. Ruckdeschel, O. Hauser, “Yule–Nielsen in printing: a physical analysis,” Appl. Opt. 17, 3376–3383 (1978). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. J. Arney, “A probability description of the Yule–Nielsen effect I,” J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 41, 633–636 (1997).
  8. G. Rogers, “Optical dot gain: lateral scattering probabilities,” J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 42, 341–345 (1998).
  9. L. Yang, R. Lenz, B. Kruse, “Light scattering and ink penetration effects on tone reproduction,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 360–366 (2001). [CrossRef]
  10. F. Clapper, J. Yule, “The effect of multiple internal reflections on the densities of halftone prints on paper,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 43, 600–603 (1953). [CrossRef]
  11. G. Rogers, “A generalized Clapper–Yule model of halftone reflectance,” Color Res. Appl. 25, 402–407 (2000). [CrossRef]
  12. P. Emmel, R. D. Hersch. “A unified model for color prediction of halftoned prints,” J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 44, 351–359 (2000).
  13. R. D. Hersch, F. Collaud, F. Crété, P. Emmel, “Spectral prediction and dot surface estimation models for halftone prints,” in Color Imaging IX: Processing, Hardcopy, and Applications, R. Eschbach and G. G. Marcu; eds., Proc. SPIE5293, 356–369 (2004).
  14. J. A. Sanchez-Gil, M. Nieto-Vesperinas, “Light scattering from random rough dielectric surfaces,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 8, 1270–1286 (1991). [CrossRef]
  15. J. Caron, J. Lafait, C. Andraud, “Scalar Kirchhoff’s model for light scattering from dielectric random rough surfaces,” Opt. Commun. 207, 17–28 (2002). [CrossRef]
  16. T. Germer, “Polarized light diffusely scattered under smooth and rough interfaces,” Polarization Science and Remote Sensing, J. A. Shaw and J. S. Tyo, eds., Proc. SPIE5158, 193–204 (2003).
  17. S. K. Nayar, K. Ikeuchi, T. Kanade, “Surface reflection: physical and geometrical perspectives,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 13, 611–634 (1991). [CrossRef]
  18. M. Born, E. Wolf, Principle of Optics, 7th expanded ed. (Pergamon, 1999), p. 47.
  19. D. B. Judd, “Fresnel reflection of diffusely incident light,” J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 29, 329–332 (1942). [CrossRef]
  20. W. R. McCluney, Introduction to Radiometry and Photometry (Artech House, 1994) pp. 7–13.
  21. K. E. Torrance, E. M. Sparrow, “Theory of off-specular reflection from roughened surfaces,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 1104–1114 (1967). [CrossRef]
  22. D. Becker, K. Kasper, “Digital prints: technology, materials, image quality & stability,” http://www.foto.unibas.ch/~rundbrief/les33.htm.
  23. B. G. Smith, “Geometrical shadowing of a random rough surface,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. AP-15, 668–671 (1967). [CrossRef]
  24. N. C. Bruce, “On the validity of the inclusion of geometrical shadowing functions in the multiple-scatter Kirchhoff approximation,” Waves Random Media 14, 1–12 (2004). [CrossRef]
  25. P. Hansson, “Geometrical modeling of light scattering from paper substrates,” Diploma work (Department of Engineering Sciences, The Ångström Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, 2003). http://www.angstrom.uu.se/solidstatephysics/dissertation_ram/peter_hansson_art/Paper9_v15pdf.
  26. F. C. Williams, F. R. Clapper, “Multiple internal reflections in photographic color prints,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 43, 595–599 (1953). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. M. C. Béland, J. M. Bennett, “Effect of local microroughness on the gloss uniformity of printed paper surfaces,” Appl. Opt. 39, 2719–2726 (2000). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4 Fig. 5
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited