OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Editor: Stephen A. Burns
  • Vol. 24, Iss. 12 — Dec. 1, 2007
  • pp: B81–B90

Salience measure for assessing scale-based features in mammograms

Philip Perconti and Murray H. Loew  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 24, Issue 12, pp. B81-B90 (2007)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (512 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



This work assesses the usefulness of an objective, task-based image quality measure that is correlated with perceived image quality; the measure uses the most salient features contained within a medical image. Contributions include the development of a perceptually correlated metric that is useful for quantifying the salience of local, low-level visual cues and identifying those spatial frequencies that are most distinct and perhaps most relied upon by radiologists for decision making. A set of 40 mammograms and registered eye position data from nine observers was used to evaluate the salience metric. A parsimonious analysis-of-variance model explained the variance in the salience results. This analysis is generalized to a population of readers and cases. An analysis of salience versus time of first eye fixation shows good correlation with true positive lesions that were found by experienced readers in less than 2 s .

© 2007 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(100.2960) Image processing : Image analysis
(170.3830) Medical optics and biotechnology : Mammography
(170.3880) Medical optics and biotechnology : Medical and biological imaging
(330.6100) Vision, color, and visual optics : Spatial discrimination

Original Manuscript: February 26, 2007
Revised Manuscript: August 23, 2007
Manuscript Accepted: August 27, 2007
Published: September 28, 2007

Virtual Issues
Vol. 3, Iss. 1 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Philip Perconti and Murray H. Loew, "Salience measure for assessing scale-based features in mammograms," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24, B81-B90 (2007)

Sort:  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. H. L. Kundel and G. Revesz, "Lesion conspicuity, structured noise, and film reader error," Am. J. Roentgenol. 126, 1233-1238 (1976).
  2. A. Treisman and G. Gelade, "A feature-integration theory of attention," Cogn. Psychol. 12, 97-136 (1980). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. J. M. Wolfe, K. R. Cave, and S. L. Franzel, "An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search," J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 15, 419-433 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. J. M. Wolfe and G. Gancarz, "Guided search 3.0: A model of visual search catches up with Jay Enoch 40 years later," in Basic and Clinical Applications of Vision Science, V.Lakshminarayanan, ed. (Kluwer Academic, 1996), pp. 189-192.
  5. C. Koch and S. Ullman, "Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry," Hum. Neurobiol. 4, 219-227 (1985).
  6. J. M. Wolfe, "Moving towards solutions to some enduring controversies in visual search," Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 70-76 (2003). [CrossRef]
  7. A. Oliva, A. Torralba, M. S. Castelhano, and J. M. Henderson, "Top-down control of visual attention in object detection," in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (IEEE, 2003), pp. 253-256.
  8. S. Palmer, Vision Science (MIT Press, 2002).
  9. L. Itti, C. Koch, and E. Niebur, "A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis," IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 20, 1254-1259 (1998). [CrossRef]
  10. L. Itti and C. Koch, "A comparison of feature combination strategies for saliency-based visual attention systems," Proc. SPIE 3644, 473-482 (1999). [CrossRef]
  11. D. Parkhurst, K. Law, and E. Neibur, "Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention," Vision Res. 42, 107-123 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. O. Le Meur, P. Le Callet, D. Barba, D. Thoreau, and E. Francois, "From low level perception to high level perception, a coherent approach for visual attention modeling," Proc. SPIE 5292, 284-295 (2004). [CrossRef]
  13. R. J. Peters, A. Iyer, L. Itti, and C. Koch, "Components of bottom-up gaze allocation in natural images," Vision Res. 45, 2397-2416 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. R. P. N. Rao, G. J. Zelinsky, M. M. Hayhoe, and D. H. Ballard, "Eye movements in iconic visual search," Vision Res. 42, 1447-1463 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. B. W. Tatler, R. J. Baddeley, and I. D. Gilchrist, "Visual correlates of fixation selection: effects of scale and time," Vision Res. 45, 643-659 (2005). [CrossRef]
  16. H. L. Kundel, C. F. Nodine, and E. A. Krupkinski, "Searching for lung nodules: visual dwell indicates locations of false-positive and false negative decisions," Invest. Radiol. 24, 472-478 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. E. A. Krupinski and R. M. Nishikawa, "Comparison of eye position data versus computer identified microcalcification clusters on mammograms," Med. Phys. 24, 17-23 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. P. K. White, T. L. Hutson, and T. E. Hutchinson, "Modeling human eye behavior during mammographic scanning: preliminary results," IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 27, 494-505 (1997). [CrossRef]
  19. C. F. Nodine, "Blinded review of retrospectively visible unreported breast cancers: an eye-position analysis," Radiology 221, 122-129 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. L. Dempere-Marco, X.-P. Hu, S. L. S. MacDonald, S. M. Ellis, D. M. Hansell, and G.-Z. Yang, "The use of visual search for knowledge gathering in image decision support," IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 21, 741-754 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. X.-P. Hu, L. Dempere-Marco, and G.-Z. Yang, "Hot spot detection based on feature space representation of visual search in medical imaging," in Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Information Technology Applications in Biomedicine (IEEE, 2003), pp. 261-264.
  22. S. Samuel, H. L. Kundel, C. F. Nodine, and L. C. Toto, "Mechanism of satisfaction of search: eye position recordings in the reading of chest radiographs," Radiology 194, 895-902 (1995). [PubMed]
  23. E. A. Krupinski, "Medical image perception: evaluating the role of experience," Proc. SPIE 3959, 281-289 (2000). [CrossRef]
  24. C. Mello-Thoms, S. Dunn, C. F. Nodine, H. L. Kundel, and S. P. Weinstein, "The perception of breast cancer: what differentiates missed from reported cancers in mammography?" Acad. Radiol. 9, 1004-1012 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. C. Mello-Thoms, S. Dunn, C. F. Nodine, and H. L. Kundel, "The perception of breast cancers--a spatial frequency analysis of what differentiates missed from reported cancers," IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 22, 1297-1306 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. J. Lubin, "A visual discrimination model for imaging system design and evaluation," in Vision Models for Target Detection and Recognition, E.Peli, ed. (World Scientific, 1995), pp. 245-283.
  27. S. Daly, "The visible difference predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity," in Digital Images and Human Vision, A.B.Watson, ed. (MIT Press, 1993), pp. 179-206.
  28. P. C. Teo and D. J. Heeger, "Perceptual image distortion," in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (IEEE, 1994), pp. 982-986.
  29. A. B. Watson and J. A. Solomon, "Model of visual contrast gain control and pattern masking," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 2379-2391 (1997). [CrossRef]
  30. W. T. Freeman and E. H. Adelson, "The design and use of steerable filters," IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 13, 891-906 (1991). [CrossRef]
  31. P. J. Burt and E. H. Adelson, "The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code," IEEE Trans. Commun. 31, 532-540 (1983). [CrossRef]
  32. A. B. Watson, "The cortex transform: rapid computation of simulated neural images," Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process. 39, 311-327 (1987). [CrossRef]
  33. E. Peli, "Feature detection algorithm based on a visual system model," Proc. IEEE 90, 78-93 (2002). [CrossRef]
  34. A. P. Bradley, "A wavelet visible difference predictor," IEEE Trans. Image Process. 8, 717-730 (1999). [CrossRef]
  35. J. Oh, S. I. Woolley, T. N. Arvanitis, and J. N. Townend, "A multistage perceptual quality assessment for compressed digital angiogram images," IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20, 1351-1361 (2001). [CrossRef]
  36. T. S. Lee, "Image representation using 2D Gabor wavelets," IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 18, 959-971 (1996). [CrossRef]
  37. J. G. Daugman, "Two-dimensional spectral analysis of cortical receptive field profiles," Vision Res. 20, 847-856 (1980). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. T. S. Lee, "Representational strategy in the visual cortex," in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (IEEE, 1994), pp. 590-594.
  39. S. S. Stevens, "To honor Fechner and repeal his law," Science 133, 80-86 (1961). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. J. G. Daugman, "Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensional visual cortical filters," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 1160-1169 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. G. M. Haley and B. S. Manjunath, "Rotation-invariant texture classification using a complete space-frequency model," IEEE Trans. Image Process. 8, 255-269 (1999). [CrossRef]
  42. R. Rosenholtz, "A simple saliency model predicts a number of motion popout phenomena," Vision Res. 39, 3157-3163 (1999). [CrossRef]
  43. J. P. Collomosse and P. M. Hall, "Painterly rendering using image salience," in Proceedings of IEEE Conference Eurographics UK (IEEE, 2002), pp. 122-128. [CrossRef]
  44. N. A. Macmillan and C. D. Creelman, Detection Theory: a User's Guide (Lawrence Erlbaum, 2005).
  45. M. J. Mayer and C. W. Tyler, "Invariance of the slope of the psychometric function with spatial summation," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 3, 1166-1172 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. H. Kundel, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa., 19104 (personal communication, 2003).
  47. R. G. Swensson, "Unified measurement of observer performance in detecting and localizing target objects on images," Med. Phys. 23, 1709-1725 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. H. L. Kundel, "Visual search in medical images," in Handbook of Medical Imaging, J.Beutel, H.L.Kundel, and R.Van Metter, eds. (SPIE Press, 2000), pp. 837-858.
  49. C. A. Roe and C. E. Metz, "Variance-component modeling in the analysis of receiver operating characteristic index estimate," Acad. Radiol. 4, 587-600 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. N. A. Obuchowski, "Multireader receiver operating characteristic studies: a comparison of study designs," Acad. Radiol. 2, 709-716 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. S. V. Beiden, M. A. Maloof, and R. F. Wagner, "A general model for finite-sample effects in training and testing of competing classifiers," IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 25, 1561-1569 (2003). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited