OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Editor: Stephen A. Burns
  • Vol. 24, Iss. 3 — Mar. 1, 2007
  • pp: 702–710

Evaluation of the telegrapher’s equation and multiple-flux theories for calculating the transmittance and reflectance of a diffuse absorbing slab

Steven H. Kong and Joel D. Shore  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 24, Issue 3, pp. 702-710 (2007)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.24.000702


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (212 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We study the propagation of light through a medium containing isotropic scattering and absorption centers. With a Monte Carlo simulation serving as the benchmark solution to the radiative transfer problem of light propagating through a turbid slab, we compare the transmission and reflection density computed from the telegrapher’s equation, the diffusion equation, and multiple-flux theories such as the Kubelka–Munk and four-flux theories. Results are presented for both normally incident light and diffusely incident light. We find that we can always obtain very good results from the telegrapher’s equation provided that two parameters that appear in the solution are set appropriately. We also find an interesting connection between certain solutions of the telegrapher’s equation and solutions of the Kubelka–Munk and four-flux theories with a small modification to how the phenomenological parameters in those theories are traditionally related to the optical scattering and absorption coefficients of the slab. Finally, we briefly explore how well the theories can be extended to the case of anisotropic scattering by multiplying the scattering coefficient by a simple correction factor.

© 2007 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(000.3860) General : Mathematical methods in physics
(290.4210) Scattering : Multiple scattering
(290.7050) Scattering : Turbid media
(350.5500) Other areas of optics : Propagation

ToC Category:
Scattering

History
Original Manuscript: July 13, 2006
Revised Manuscript: September 26, 2006
Manuscript Accepted: September 26, 2006
Published: February 14, 2007

Virtual Issues
Vol. 2, Iss. 4 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Citation
Steven H. Kong and Joel D. Shore, "Evaluation of the telegrapher's equation and multiple-flux theories for calculating the transmittance and reflectance of a diffuse absorbing slab," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24, 702-710 (2007)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-24-3-702


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. D. J. Durian, "The diffusion coefficient depends on absorption," Opt. Lett. 23, 1502-1504 (1998). [CrossRef]
  2. H. W. Jensen, S. R. Marschner, M. Levoy, and P. Hanrahan, "A practical model for subsurface light transport," in Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (ACM, 2001), pp. 511-518.
  3. S. H. Kong and J. D. Shore, "Modeling the impact of silver particle size and morphology on the covering power of photothermographic media," in Proceedings of the 30th International Congress of Imaging Science (The Society of Imaging Science and Technology, 2006) pp. 205-207.
  4. P. Kubelka and F. Munk, "Ein beitrag zur optik der farbanstriche," Z. Tech. Phys. (Leipzig) 12, 593-601 (1931).
  5. H. G. Völz, Industrial Color Testing (VCH, 1995).
  6. L. Yang and S. J. Miklavcic, "Theory of light propagation incorporating scattering and absorption in turbid media," Opt. Lett. 30, 792-794 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. L. Yang and B. Kruse, "Revised Kubelka-Munk theory. I. Theory and application," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 21, 1933-1941 (2004). [CrossRef]
  8. L. Yang, B. Kruse, and S. J. Miklavcic, "Revised Kubelka-Munk theory. II. Unified framework for homogeneous and inhomogeneous optical media," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 21, 1942-1952 (2004). [CrossRef]
  9. L. Yang and S. J. Miklavcic, "Revised Kubelka-Munk theory. III. A general theory of light propagation in scattering and absorptive media," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 22, 1866-1873 (2005). [CrossRef]
  10. P. C. Waterman, "Matrix-exponential description of radiative transfer," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 71, 410-422 (1981).
  11. S. Chandrasekhar, Radiative Transfer (Dover, 1960).
  12. J. J. DePalma and J. Gasper, "Determining the optical properties of photographic emulsions by the Monte Carlo method," Photograph. Sci. Eng. 16, 181-191 (1972).
  13. A. Ishimaru, Wave Propagation and Scattering in Random Media (Academic, 1978), Vol. I.
  14. A. Ishimaru, "Diffusion of light in turbid material," Appl. Opt. 28, 2210-2215 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. D. J. Durian and J. Rudnick, "Photon migration at short times and distances and in cases of strong absorption," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 235-245 (1997). [CrossRef]
  16. R. Pierrat, J.-J. Greffet, and R. Carminati, "Photon diffusion coefficient in scattering and absorbing media," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 23, 1106-1110 (2006). [CrossRef]
  17. R. Aronson and N. Corngold, "Photon diffusion coefficient in an absorbing medium," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 1066-1071 (1999). [CrossRef]
  18. V. Gopal, S. A. Ramakrishna, A. K. Sood, and N. Kumar, "Photon transport in thin disordered slabs," Pramana, J. Phys. 56, 767-778 (2001). [CrossRef]
  19. W. Cai, M. Xu, M. Lax, and R. R. Alfano, "Diffusion coefficient depends on time, not on absorption," Opt. Lett. 27, 731-733 (2002). [CrossRef]
  20. K. R. Naqvi, "On the diffusion coefficient of a photon migrating through a turbid medium: Fresh look from a broader perspective," arXiv.org e-print archive, cond-mat/0504429, June 9, 2005, http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0504429.
  21. R. C. Haskell, L. O. Svaasand, T. Tsay, T. Feng, M. S. MacAdams, and B. J. Tromberg, "Boundary conditions for the diffusion equation in radiative transfer," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 2727-2741 (1994). [CrossRef]
  22. In the earliest two papers of Yang et al. [Refs. ], the authors make it clear that μ should be greater than or equal to 1, as we assume here, since μ physically corresponds to the factor of increase in the path length due to the scattering. In their later two papers [Refs. ], however, they are unclear on this point and, in fact, seem to implicitly assume that limits in which μ<1 are sensible to discuss. If we do not assume μ must be greater or equal to 1 but instead use the expression shown for s2>/=a2+as over the entire range of ad, it does significantly affect the quantitative results that we obtain for the transmission density for the RKM theory in Section . However, it does not change our basic conclusions concerning the quality of the agreement between the RKM theory and the Monte Carlo results.
  23. To verify the correctness of the Monte Carlo results, we have made comparisons between two different codes written independently by the two authors in different programming languages using different random number generators. Furthermore, the Monte Carlo results for no scattering (i.e., the rightmost data point in each figure) are found to be in excellent agreement with the exact results that can readily be calculated for that simpler case.
  24. L. G. Henyey and J. L. Greenstein, "Diffuse radiation in the galaxy," Astrophys. J. 93, 70-83 (1941). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited