OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Editor: Stephen A. Burns
  • Vol. 24, Iss. 7 — Jul. 1, 2007
  • pp: 1873–1885

Structural sparseness and spatial phase alignment in natural scenes

Bruce C. Hansen and Robert F. Hess  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 24, Issue 7, pp. 1873-1885 (2007)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1561 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



The Fourier phase spectrum plays a central role regarding where in an image contours occur, thereby defining the spatial relationship between those structures in the overall scene. Only a handful of studies have demonstrated psychophysically the relevance of the Fourier phase spectrum with respect to human visual processing, and none have demonstrated the relative amount of local cross-scale spatial phase alignment needed to perceptually extract meaningful structure from an image. We investigated the relative amount of spatial phase alignment needed for humans to perceptually match natural scene image structures at three different spatial frequencies [3, 6, and 12   cycles per degree (cpd)] as a function of the number of structures within the image (i.e., “structural sparseness”). The results showed that (1) the amount of spatial phase alignment needed to match structures depends on structural sparseness, with a bias for matching structures at 6 cpd and (2) the ability to match partially phase-randomized images at a given spatial frequency is independent of structural sparseness at other spatial frequencies. The findings of the current study are discussed in terms of a network of feature integrators in the human visual system.

© 2007 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.1880) Vision, color, and visual optics : Detection
(330.5020) Vision, color, and visual optics : Perception psychology
(330.5510) Vision, color, and visual optics : Psychophysics

ToC Category:
Vision and Color

Original Manuscript: November 7, 2006
Revised Manuscript: February 6, 2007
Manuscript Accepted: February 16, 2007
Published: June 13, 2007

Virtual Issues
Vol. 2, Iss. 8 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Bruce C. Hansen and Robert F. Hess, "Structural sparseness and spatial phase alignment in natural scenes," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24, 1873-1885 (2007)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. H. B. Barlow, "Redundancy reduction revisited," Network 12, 241-253 (2001). [PubMed]
  2. J. J. Atick and A. N. Redlich, "What does the retina know about natural scenes?" Neural Comput. 4, 196-210 (1992). [CrossRef]
  3. D. J. Field, "Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 2379-2394 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. D. J. Field and N. Brady, "Visual sensitivity, blur and the sources of variability in the amplitude spectra of natural scenes," Vision Res. 37, 3367-3383 (1997). [CrossRef]
  5. A. V. Oppenheim and J. S. Lim, "The importance of phase in signals," Proc. IEEE 69, 529-541 (1981). [CrossRef]
  6. E. Doi and M. S. Lewicki, "Relations between the statistical regularities of natural images and the response properties of the early visual system," in Proceedings of the Workshop of Special Interest Group of Pattern Recognition and Perception Model (SIG P&P) (Japanese Cognitive Science Society, Kyoto University, 2005), pp. 1-8.
  7. B. C. Hansen, E. A. Essock, Y. Zheng, and J. K. DeFord, "Perceptual anisotropies in visual processing and their relation to natural image statistics," Network 14, 501-526 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. D. Marr, Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information (Freeman, 1982). [PubMed]
  9. M. C. Morrone and R. A. Owens, "Feature detection from local energy," Pattern Recogn. Lett. 6, 303-313 (1987). [CrossRef]
  10. M. C. Morrone and D. C. Burr, "Feature detection in human vision: a phase dependent energy model," Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 235, 221-245 (1988). [CrossRef]
  11. P. Kovesi, "Image features from phase congruency," Videre 1, 1-26 (1999).
  12. Z. Wang and E. P. Simoncelli, "Local phase coherence and the perception of blur," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, S.Thurn, L.Saul, and B.Schölkopf, eds. (MIT Press, 2004), pp. 1435-1442.
  13. N. Graham, "Spatial-frequency channels in human vision: detecting edges without edge detectors," in Visual Coding and Adaptability, C.Harris, ed. (Erlbaum, 1980), pp. 215-252.
  14. J. G. Robson and N. Graham, "Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field," Vision Res. 21, 409-418 (1981). [CrossRef]
  15. L. Olzak and J. P. Thomas, "Seeing spatial patterns," in Handbook of Perception and Human Performance: Sensory Processes and Perception, K.R.Boff, L.Kaufman, and J.P.Thomas, eds. (Wiley, 1986), Vol. 1.
  16. C. Chubb, L. Olzak, and A. Derrington, "Second-order processes in vision: introduction," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 2175-2178 (2001). [CrossRef]
  17. G. Felsen, J. Touryan, F. Han, and Y. Dan, "Cortical sensitivity to visual features in natural scenes," PLoS Biology 3, 1819-1828 (2005). [CrossRef]
  18. A. M. Treisman and G. Gelade, "A feature-integration theory of attention," Cogn. Psychol. 12, 97-136 (1980). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. I. Biederman, "Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding," Psychol. Rev. 94, 115-147 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. M. J. Tarr and H. H. Bulthoff, "Image-based object recognition in man, monkey and machine," Cognition 67, 1-20 (1998). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. L. N. Piotrowski and F. W. Campbell, "A demonstration of the visual importance and flexibility of spatial-frequency amplitude and phase," Perception 11, 337-346 (1982). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. F. A. Wichmann, D. I. Braun, and K. R. Gegenfurtner, "Phase noise and the classification of natural images," Vision Res. 46, 1520-1529 (2006). [CrossRef]
  23. G. J. Burton and I. R. Moorhead, "Color and spatial structure in natural scenes," Appl. Opt. 26, 157-170 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. D. J. Tolhurst, Y. Tadmor, and T. Chao, "Amplitude spectra of natural images," Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 12, 229-232 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. D. L. Ruderman and W. Bialek, "Statistics of natural images: scaling in the Woods," Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 814-817 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. A. van der Schaaf and J. H. van Hateren, "Modeling the power spectra of natural images: statistics and Information," Vision Res. 36, 2759-2770 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. B. C. Hansen and E. A. Essock, "Influence of scale and orientation on the visual perception of natural scenes," Visual Cogn. 12, 1199-1234 (2005). [CrossRef]
  28. J. G. Daugman, "Entropy reduction and decorrelation in visual coding by oriented neural receptive fields," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 36, 107-114 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. R. Baddeley, "Searching for filters with "interesting" output distributions: an uninteresting direction to explore?" Network 7, 409-421 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. J. A. Movshon, I. D. Thompson, and D. J. Tolhurst, "Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex," J. Physiol. (London) 283, 53-77 (1978).
  31. B. W. Andrews and D. A. Pollen, "Relationship between spatial frequency selectivity and receptive field profile of simple cells," J. Physiol. (London) 287, 163-176 (1979).
  32. J. P. Jones and L. A. Palmer, "The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex," J. Neurophysiol. 58, 1187-1211 (1987). [PubMed]
  33. J. P. Jones and L. A. Palmer, "An evaluation of the two-dimensional gabor filter models of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex," J. Neurophysiol. 58, 1233-1258 (1987). [PubMed]
  34. D. J. Field and D. J. Tolhurst, "The structure and symmetry of simple-cell receptive-field profiles in the cat's visual system," Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 228, 379-400 (1986). [CrossRef]
  35. D. J. Field, "Scale-invariance and self-similar 'wavelet' transforms: an analysis of natural scenes and mammalian visual systems," in Wavelets, Fractals and Fourier Transforms: New Developments and New Applications, M.Farge, J.C. R.Hunt, and J.C.Vassilicos, eds. (Oxford U. Press, 1993).
  36. F. A. Wichmann and N. J. Hill, "The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit," Percept. Psychophys. 63, 1293-1313 (2001). [CrossRef]
  37. F. A. Wichmann and N. J. Hill, "The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling," Percept. Psychophys. 63, 1314-1329 (2001). [CrossRef]
  38. B. C. Hansen and E. A. Essock, "A horizontal bias in human visual processing of orientation and its correspondence to the structural components of natural scenes," J. Vision 4, 1044-1060 (2004). [CrossRef]
  39. J. H. van Hateren and A. van der Schaaf, "Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex," Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 265, 359-366 (1998). [CrossRef]
  40. D. G. Pelli, C. W. Burns, B. Farell, and D. C. Moore-Page, "Feature detection and letter identification," Vision Res. 46, 4646-4674 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. D. J. Field, A. Hayes, and R. F. Hess, "Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local association field," Vision Res. 33, 173-193 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. T. Ledgeway, R. F. Hess, and W. S. Geisler, "Grouping local orientation and direction signals to extract spatial contours: empirical tests of 'association field' models of contour integration," Vision Res. 45, 2511-2522 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. S. C. Dakin and R. F. Hess, "Spatial-frequency tuning of visual contour integration," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 1486-1499 (1998). [CrossRef]
  44. D. J. Field, A. Hayes, and R. F. Hess, "The roles of polarity and symmetry in the perceptual grouping of contour fragments," Spatial Vis. 13, 51-66 (2000). [CrossRef]
  45. B. C. Hansen and R. F. Hess, "The role of spatial phase in texture segmentation and contour integration," J. Vision 6, 594-615 (2006). [CrossRef]
  46. S. C. Dakin and R. F. Hess, "Contour integration and scale combination processes in visual edge detection," Spatial Vis. 12, 309-327 (1999). [CrossRef]
  47. D. H. Hubel and T. N. Wiesel, "Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex," J. Physiol. (London) 160, 106-154 (1962).
  48. R. L. De Valois, D. G. Albrecht, and L. G. Thorell, "Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex," Vision Res. 22, 545-559 (1982). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. J. A. Movshon, I. D. Thompson, and D. J. Tolhurst, "Receptive field organization of complex cells in the cat's striate cortex," J. Physiol. (London) 283, 79-99 (1978).
  50. G. Krieger and C. Zetzsche, "Nonlinear image operators for the evaluation of local intrinsic dimensionality," IEEE Trans. Image Process. 5, 1026-1042 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. G. Krieger, C. Zetzsche, and E. Barth, "Higher-order statistics of natural images and their exploitation by operators selective to intrinsic dimensionality," in Proceedings of the IEEE Signal Processing Workshop on Higher Order Statistics (IEEE, 1997), pp. 147-151. [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited