Abstract

Previous work has demonstrated that humans select visuomotor strategies maximizing expected gain during speeded hand movements under risk; see, e.g., [Trends Cogn. Sci.12, 291 (2008)]; [Glimcher, eds., Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain (Elsevier, 2008), p. 95]. Here we report a similar study in which we recorded saccadic eye movements in a saccadic decision task in which monetary rewards and losses were associated with the final position of the eye movement. Saccades into a color-coded target region won points; saccades into a partially overlapping or abutting penalty region could yield a loss. The points won during the experiment were converted into a small monetary bonus at the end of the experiment. We compared participants' winnings to the score of an optimal observer maximizing expected gain that was calculated based on each participant's saccadic endpoint variability, similar to a recent model of optimal movement planning under risk [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A20, 1419 (2003)]; [Spatial Vis.16, 255 (2003)]. We used three different experimental paradigms with different interstimulus intervals (Gap, No Gap, and Overlap) to manipulate saccadic latencies and a fourth experiment (Memory) with a prolonged 500 ms delay period. Our results show that our subjects took the reward information, as specified by the different penalties, into account when making saccades and fixated onto or very close to the target region and less into the penalty region. However, the selected strategies differed significantly from optimal strategies maximizing expected gain in conditions when the magnitude of reward or penalty was changed. Furthermore, scores were notably affected by stimulus saliency. They were higher when the target region was filled and the penalty region outlined by a thin line, as compared to conditions in which the target was indicated by a less salient stimulus. Scores were particularly poor in trials with the shortest latencies (120-140 ms) mostly obtained in the Gap paradigm. At longer latencies scores improved considerably for latencies longer than 160 ms. This was in line with an improvement in accuracy for single targets up to 160 ms. Our results indicate that processing both of reward information and of stimulus saliency affect the programming of saccades, with a dominating contribution of stimulus saliency for eye movements with faster latencies.

© 2009 Optical Society of America

» View Full Text: Acrobat PDF (904 KB)

History
Original Manuscript: March 11, 2009
Manuscript Accepted: July 6, 2009
Revised Manuscript: June 26, 2009
Published: August 18, 2009

References

Please [login to View References]

Author Affiliations

Martin Stritzke, Julia Trommershäuser, Karl R. Gegenfurtner

Giessen University

Cited By

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Advanced Search

Recent ToC Categories (Beta)

• Oct 08 2009 : See the latest ISP articles in the Applied Optics feature on Digital Holography in 3-D Imaging.
• Sep 25 2009 : Energy Express: Optics Express announces a special bi-monthly supplement dedicated to rapid developments in optics for sustainable energy.
• Sep 21 2009 : The 2009 Education and Training in Optics and Photonics papers are now available.

More News

• Invisibility Visualized
  Nov 12, 2009 - Scientists and curiosity seekers who want to know what a partially or... more
• Diamonds are a Laser's Best Friend
  Sep 18, 2009 - Tomorrow’s lasers may come with a bit of bling, thanks to a new... more
• Open Wide and Say ‘Zap’
  Aug 19, 2009 - A group of researchers in Australia and Taiwan has developed a new... more