OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Editor: Stephen A. Burns
  • Vol. 26, Iss. 4 — Apr. 1, 2009
  • pp: 723–731

Evaluation of effective noise bandwidth for broadband optical coherence tomography operation

Ramona Cernat, George M. Dobre, Adrian Bradu, and Adrian Gh. Podoleanu  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 26, Issue 4, pp. 723-731 (2009)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.26.000723


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (878 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Key noise parameters in optical coherence tomography (OCT) systems employing splitters with a nonflat spectral response are evaluated using a supercontinuum fiber laser source with a spectrum of 450 nm 1700 nm and a time domain OCT architecture based on 1300 nm fiber splitters. The spectral behavior of the splitter leading to balanced detection is measured over a range of 300 nm . Because of spectrally different signals at the balanced detector input a residual excess photon noise term results. A rigorous treatment of this noise term [ Appl. Opt. 43, 4802 (2004) ] introduced two new quantities that take into account the spectral properties of the coupler. In this report, we have evaluated these two noise bandwidth quantities and comparatively assessed the noise behavior predicted by the classical theory with the theory based on the two new noise bandwidths. We show that under certain operating parameters, the additional excess photon noise is twice that predicted for a coupler with a flat spectral response.

© 2009 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(030.4280) Coherence and statistical optics : Noise in imaging systems
(060.2270) Fiber optics and optical communications : Fiber characterization
(060.2430) Fiber optics and optical communications : Fibers, single-mode
(110.4500) Imaging systems : Optical coherence tomography
(120.0120) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology
(230.0230) Optical devices : Optical devices

ToC Category:
Instrumentation, Measurement, and Metrology

History
Original Manuscript: September 16, 2008
Revised Manuscript: January 23, 2009
Manuscript Accepted: February 2, 2009
Published: March 5, 2009

Virtual Issues
Vol. 4, Iss. 6 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Citation
Ramona Cernat, George M. Dobre, Adrian Bradu, and Adrian Gh. Podoleanu, "Evaluation of effective noise bandwidth for broadband optical coherence tomography operation," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 26, 723-731 (2009)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-26-4-723


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. H. Liang, M. Gomez Cid, R. G. Cucu, G. M. Dobre, A. Gh. Podoleanu, J. Pedro, and D. Saunders, “En-face optical coherence tomography--a novel application of non-invasive imaging to art conservation,” Opt. Express 13, 6133-6144 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. A. Unterhuber, B. Povazay, K. Bizheva, B. Hermann, H. Sattmann, A. Stingl, T. Le, M. Seefeld, R. Menzel, M. Preusser, H. Budka, Ch. Schubert, H. Reitsamer, P. K. Ahnelt, J. E. Morgan, A. Cowey, and W. Drexler, “Advances in broad bandwidth light sources for ultrahigh resolution optical coherence tomography,” Phys. Med. Biol. 49, 1235-1246 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Fianium: http://www.fianium.com.
  4. Koheras: http://www.koheras.com.
  5. K. Takada, “Noise in optical low-coherence reflectometry,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 34, 1098-1108 (1998). [CrossRef]
  6. M. Wojtkowski, V. Srinivasan, T. Ko, J. Fujimoto, A. Kowalczyk, and J. Duker, “Ultrahigh-resolution, highspeed, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography and methods for dispersion compensation,” Opt. Express 12, 2404-2422 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. K. J. Resch, P. Puvanathasan, J. S. Lundeen, M. W. Mitchell, and K. Bizheva, “Classical dispersion-cancellation interferometry,” Opt. Express 15, 8797-8804 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. A. Gh. Podoleanu, “Unbalanced versus balanced operation in an optical coherence tomography system,” Appl. Opt. 39, 173-182 (2000). [CrossRef]
  9. C. C. Rosa and A. Gh. Podoleanu, “Limitation of the achievable signal-to-noise ratio in optical coherence tomography due to mismatch of the balanced receiver,” Appl. Opt. 43, 4802-4815 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. P. R. Morkel, R. I. Laming, and D. N. Payne, “Noise characteristics of high-power doped-fiber superluminescent sources,” Electron. Lett. 26, 96-98 (1990). [CrossRef]
  11. K. Takada, A. Himeno, and K. Yukimatsu, “Phase-noise and shot-noise limited operations of low coherence optical time domain reflectometry,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 2483-2485 (1991). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited