OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Editor: Stephen A. Burns
  • Vol. 26, Iss. 7 — Jul. 1, 2009
  • pp: 1687–1695

Binary mask optimization for forward lithography based on the boundary layer model in coherent systems

Xu Ma and Gonzalo R. Arce  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 26, Issue 7, pp. 1687-1695 (2009)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (277 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Recently, a set of generalized gradient-based optical proximity correction (OPC) optimization methods have been developed to solve for the forward and inverse lithography problems under the thin-mask assumption, where the mask is considered a thin 2D object. However, as the critical dimension printed on the wafer shrinks into the subwavelength regime, thick-mask effects become prevalent, and thus these effects must be taken into account in OPC optimization methods. OPC methods derived under the thin-mask assumption have inherent limitations and perform poorly in the subwavelength regime. This paper focuses on developing model-based forward binary mask optimization methods that account for the thick-mask effects of coherent imaging systems. The boundary layer (BL) model is exploited to simplify and characterize the thick-mask effects, leading to a model-based OPC method. The BL model is simpler than other thick-mask models, treating the near field of the mask as the superposition of the interior transmission areas and the boundary layers. The advantages and limitations of the proposed algorithm are discussed, and several illustrative simulations are presented.

© 2009 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(100.3190) Image processing : Inverse problems
(110.1650) Imaging systems : Coherence imaging
(220.3740) Optical design and fabrication : Lithography

ToC Category:
Optical Design and Fabrication

Original Manuscript: March 9, 2009
Revised Manuscript: May 20, 2009
Manuscript Accepted: May 23, 2009
Published: June 24, 2009

Xu Ma and Gonzalo R. Arce, "Binary mask optimization for forward lithography based on the boundary layer model in coherent systems," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 26, 1687-1695 (2009)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. A. K. Wong, Resolution Enhancement Techniques (SPIE Press, 2001). [CrossRef]
  2. S. A. Campbell, The Science and Engineering of Microelectronic Fabrication2nd ed. (Publishing House of Electronics Industry, Beijing, China, 2003).
  3. F. Schellenberg, “Resolution enhancement technology: The past, the present, and extensions for the future, optical microlithography,” Proc. SPIE 5377, 1-20 (2004). [CrossRef]
  4. F. Schellenberg, Resolution Enhancement Techniques in Optical Lithography (SPIE Press, 2004).
  5. L. Liebmann, S. Mansfield, A. Wong, M. Lavin, W. Leipold, and T. Dunham, “TCAD development for lithography resolution enhancement,” IBM J. Res. Dev. 45, 651-665 (2001). [CrossRef]
  6. S. Sherif, B. Saleh, and R. Leone, “Binary image synthesis using mixed integer programming,” IEEE Trans. Image Process. 4, 1252-1257 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Y. Liu and A. Zakhor, “Binary and phase shifting mask design for optical lithography,” IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf. 5, 138-152 (1992). [CrossRef]
  8. Y. C. Pati and T. Kailath, “Phase-shifting masks for microlithography: Automated design and mask requirements,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 2438-2452 (1994). [CrossRef]
  9. A. Erdmann, R. Farkas, T. Fuhner, B. Tollkuhn, and G. Kokai, “Towards automatic mask and source optimization for optical lithography,” Proc. SPIE 5377, 646-657 (2004). [CrossRef]
  10. L. Pang, Y. Liu, and D. Abrams, “Inverse lithography technology (ilt): What is the impact to the photomask industry?” Proc. SPIE 6283, 62830X-1 (2006). [CrossRef]
  11. Y. Granik, “Illuminator optimization methods in microlithography,” Proc. SPIE 5524, 217-229 (2004). [CrossRef]
  12. A. Poonawala and P. Milanfar, “Mask design for optical microlithography--an inverse imaging problem,” IEEE Trans. Image Process. 16, 774-788 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. X. Ma and G. R. Arce, “Generalized inverse lithography methods for phase-shifting mask design,” Proc. SPIE 6520, 65200U (2007). [CrossRef]
  14. X. Ma and G. R. Arce, “Generalized inverse lithography methods for phase-shifting mask design,” Opt. Express 15, 15066-15079 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. X. Ma and G. R. Arce, “Binary mask optimization for inverse lithography with partially coherent illumination,” Proc. SPIE 7140, 71401A (2008). [CrossRef]
  16. X. Ma and G. R. Arce, “Binary mask optimization for inverse lithography with partially coherent illumination,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 25, 2960-2970 (2008). [CrossRef]
  17. X. Ma and G. R. Arce, “Psm design for inverse lithography using illumination with samll partial coherence factor,” Proc. SPIE 7274, 727437 (2009). [CrossRef]
  18. X. Ma and G. R. Arce, “Psm design for inverse lithography with partially coherent illumination,” Opt. Express 16, 20126-20141 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. X. Ma and G. R. Arce, “Pixel-based simultaneous source and mask optimization,” Opt. Express 17, 5783-5793 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. J. Tirapu-Azpiroz, P. Burchard, and E. Yablonovitch, “Boundary layer model to account for thick mask effects in photolithography,” Proc. SPIE 5040, 1611-1619 (2003). [CrossRef]
  21. J. Tirapu-Azpiroz and E. Yablonovitch, “Fast evaluation of photomask near-fields in subwavelength 193 nm lithography,” Proc. SPIE 5377, 1528-1535 (2004). [CrossRef]
  22. A. Wong, “Rigorous three-dimensional time-domain finite difference electromagnetic simulation,” Ph.D. thesis (University of California, Berkeley, 1994).
  23. A. Wong and A. R. Neureuther, “Mask topography effects in projection printing of phase shift masks,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 41, 895-902 (1994). [CrossRef]
  24. C. Pierrat, A. Wong, and S. Vaidya, “Phase-shifting mask topography effects on lithographic image quality,” in IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, Technical Digest (IEEE, 1992), pp. 53-56.
  25. C. M. Yuan, “Calculation of one-dimension lithographic aerial images using the vector theory,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 40, 1604-1613 (1993). [CrossRef]
  26. K. Lucas, H. Tanabe, and A. J. Strojwas, “Efficient and rigorous three-dimensional model for optical lithography simulation,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 2187-2199 (1996). [CrossRef]
  27. A. Erdmann, P. Evanschitzky, G. Citarella, T. Fühner, and P. D. Bisschop, “Rigorous mask modeling using waveguide and FDTD methods: An assessment for typical hyper NA imaging problems,” in Proc. SPIE 6283, 628319 (2006). [CrossRef]
  28. K. Adam and A. R. Neureuther, “Domain decomposition methods for the rapid electromagnetic simulation of photomask scattering,” J. Microlithogr. Microfabr. Microsyst. 1, 253-269 (2002). [CrossRef]
  29. B. E. A. Saleh and M. Rabbani, “Simulation of partially coherent imagery in the space and frequency domains and by modal expansion,” Appl. Opt. 21, 2770-2777 (1982). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. M. Born and E. Wolfe, Principles of Optics (Cambridge U. Press, 1999).
  31. R. Wilson, Fourier Series and Optical Transform Techniques in Contemporary Optics (Wiley, 1995).
  32. B. Salik, J. Rosen, and A. Yariv, “Average coherent approximation for partially cohernet optical systems,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 2086-2090 (1996). [CrossRef]
  33. J. Tirapu-Azpiroz, “Analysis and modeling of photomask near-fields in sub-wavelength deep ultraviolet lithography with optical proximity corrections,” Ph.D. thesis (University of California, Los Angeles, 2004).
  34. K. Adam, “Domain decomposition methods for the electromagnetic simulation of scattering from three-dimensional structures with applications in lithography,” Ph.D. thesis (University of California, Berkeley, 2001).
  35. A. Poonawala, “Mask design for single and double exposure optical microlithography: an inverse imaging approach,” Ph.D. thesis (University of California, Santa Cruz, 2007).
  36. L. Lam, S. W. Lee, and C. Y. Suen, “Thinning methodologies--a comprehensive survey,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 14, 869-885 (1992). [CrossRef]
  37. P. Yu and D. Z. Pan, “Tip-opc: a new topological invariant paradigm for pixel based optical proximity correction,” in Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD) (IEEE, 2007), pp. 847-853.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited