OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Editor: Stephen A. Burns
  • Vol. 26, Iss. 9 — Sep. 1, 2009
  • pp: 2033–2042

Statistical investigation of the double random phase encoding technique

David S. Monaghan, Unnikrishnan Gopinathan, Guohai Situ, Thomas J. Naughton, and John T. Sheridan  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 26, Issue 9, pp. 2033-2042 (2009)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.26.002033


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (625 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The amplitude-encoding case of the double random phase encoding technique is examined by defining a cost function as a metric to compare an attempted decryption against the corresponding original input image. For the case when a cipher–text pair has been obtained and the correct decryption key is unknown, an iterative attack technique can be employed to ascertain the key. During such an attack the noise in the output field for an attempted decryption can be used as a measure of a possible decryption key’s correctness. For relatively small systems, i.e., systems involving fewer than 5 × 5   pixels , the output decryption of every possible key can be examined to evaluate the distribution of the keys in key space in relation to their relative performance when carrying out decryption. However, in order to do this for large systems, checking every single key is currently impractical. One metric used to quantify the correctness of a decryption key is the normalized root mean squared (NRMS) error. The NRMS is a measure of the cumulative intensity difference between the input and decrypted images. We identify a core term in the NRMS, which we refer to as the difference parameter, d. Expressions for the expected value (or mean) and variance of d are derived in terms of the mean and variance of the output field noise, which is shown to be circular Gaussian. These expressions assume a large sample set (number of pixels and keys). We show that as we increase the number of samples used, the decryption error obeys the statistically predicted characteristic values. Finally, we corroborate previously reported simulations in the literature by using the statistically derived expressions.

© 2009 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(030.6600) Coherence and statistical optics : Statistical optics
(070.2580) Fourier optics and signal processing : Paraxial wave optics
(100.2000) Image processing : Digital image processing
(200.4740) Optics in computing : Optical processing

ToC Category:
Optics in Computing

History
Original Manuscript: February 27, 2009
Revised Manuscript: July 3, 2009
Manuscript Accepted: July 26, 2009
Published: August 24, 2009

Citation
David S. Monaghan, Unnikrishnan Gopinathan, Guohai Situ, Thomas J. Naughton, and John T. Sheridan, "Statistical investigation of the double random phase encoding technique," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 26, 2033-2042 (2009)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-26-9-2033


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. H. O. Yardley, The American Black Chamber (Naval Institute Press, 1931).
  2. G. F. Gaines, Cryptanalysis: A Study of Ciphers and Their Solution (Dover, 1939).
  3. W. Diffie and M. E. Hellman, “New directions in cryptography,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 22, 644-654 (1976). [CrossRef]
  4. C. A. Deavours, Cryptology Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow (Artech House, 1987).
  5. P. Réfrégier and B. Javidi, “Optical-image encryption based on input plane and Fourier plane random encoding,” Opt. Lett. 20, 767-769 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. B. Javidi and J. L. Horner, “Optical pattern recognition for validation and security verification,” Opt. Eng. 33, 224-230 (1994). [CrossRef]
  7. B. Javidi, Optical and Digital Techniques for Information Security (Springer Verlag, 2005). [CrossRef]
  8. E. Tajahuerce and B. Javidi, “Encrypting three-dimensional information with digital holography,” Appl. Opt. 39, 6595-6601 (2000). [CrossRef]
  9. L. E. M. Brackenbury and K. M. Bell, “Optical encryption of digital data,” Appl. Opt. 39, 5374-5379 (2000). [CrossRef]
  10. G. Unnikrishnan, J. Joseph, and K. Singh, “Optical encryption by double-random phase encoding in the fractional Fourier domain,” Opt. Lett. 25, 887-889 (2000). [CrossRef]
  11. B. M. Hennelly and J. T. Sheridan, “Optical image encryption by random shifting in fractional Fourier domains,” Opt. Lett. 28, 269-271 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. T. J. Naughton and B. Javidi, “Compression of encrypted three-dimensional objects using digital holography,” Opt. Eng. 43, 2233-2238 (2004). [CrossRef]
  13. B. M. Hennelly and J. T. Sheridan, “Optical encryption and the space bandwidth product,” Opt. Commun. 247, 291-305 (2005). [CrossRef]
  14. B. Javidi, A. Sergent, G. S. Zhang, and L. Guibert, “Fault tolerance properties of a double phase encoding encryption technique,” Opt. Eng. 36, 992-998 (1997). [CrossRef]
  15. F. Goudail, F. Bollaro, B. Javidi, and P. Réfrégier, “Influence of a perturbation in a double phase-encoding system,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 2629-2638 (1998). [CrossRef]
  16. B. Javidi, N. Towghi, N. Maghzi, and S. C. Verrall, “Error-reduction techniques and error analysis for fully phase- and amplitude-based encryption,” Appl. Opt. 39, 4117-4130 (2000). [CrossRef]
  17. B. M. Hennelly and J. T. Sheridan, “Image encryption and the fractional Fourier transform,” Optik (Stuttgart) 114, 251-265 (2003). [CrossRef]
  18. B. M. Hennelly and J. T. Sheridan, “Random phase and jigsaw encryption in the Fresnel domain,” Opt. Eng. 43, 2239-2249 (2004). [CrossRef]
  19. U. Gopinathan, D. S. Monaghan, T. J. Naughton, and J. T. Sheridan, “A known-plaintext heuristic attack on the Fourier plane encryption algorithm,” Opt. Express 14, 3181-3186 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. T. J. Naughton, B. Hennelly, and T. Dowling, “Introducing secure modes of operation for optical encryption,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 25, 2608-2617 (2008). [CrossRef]
  21. D. S. Monaghan, G. Situ, U. Gopinathan, T. J. Naughton, and J. T. Sheridan, “Role of phase key in the double random phase encoding technique: an error analysis,” Appl. Opt. 47, 3808-3816 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. D. S. Monaghan, U. Gopinathan, T. J. Naughton, and J. T. Sheridan, “Key-space analysis of double random phase encryption technique,” Appl. Opt. 46, 6641-6647 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. D. S. Monaghan, G. Situ, G. Unnikrishnan, T. J. Naughton, and J. T. Sheridan, “Analysis of phase encoding for optical encryption,” Opt. Commun. 282, 482-492 (2008). [CrossRef]
  24. G. Situ, U. Gopinathan, D. S. Monaghan, and J. T. Sheridan, “Cryptanalysis of optical security systems with significant output images,” Appl. Opt. 46, 5257-5262 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Y. Frauel, A. Castro, T. J. Naughton, and B. Javidi, “Resistance of the double random phase encryption against various attacks,” Opt. Express 15, 10253-10265 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. J. W. Goodman, Statistical Optics (Wiley, 2000).
  27. D. S. Monaghan, “Practical implementations and theoretical analysis of optical encryption,” Ph.D. dissertation (University College Dublin, 2009).
  28. Lena Test Image, http://sipi.usc.edu/database/.
  29. Matlab 7.0.1, http://www.mathworks.com/.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited