OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Editor: Franco Gori
  • Vol. 27, Iss. 11 — Nov. 1, 2010
  • pp: A253–A264

Tomography approach for multi-object adaptive optics

Fabrice Vidal, Eric Gendron, and Gérard Rousset  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 27, Issue 11, pp. A253-A264 (2010)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.27.00A253


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (833 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Multi-object adaptive optics (MOAO) is a solution developed to perform a correction by adaptive optics (AO) in a science large field of view. As in many wide-field AO schemes, a tomographic reconstruction of the turbulence volume is required in order to compute the MOAO corrections to be applied in the dedicated directions of the observed very faint targets. The specificity of MOAO is the open-loop control of the deformable mirrors by a number of wavefront sensors (WFSs) that are coupled to bright guide stars in different directions. MOAO calls for new procedures both for the cross registration of all the channels and for the computation of the tomographic reconstructor. We propose a new approach, called “Learn and Apply (L&A)”, that allows us to retrieve the tomographic reconstructor using the on-sky wavefront measurements from an MOAO instrument. This method is also used to calibrate the registrations between the off-axis wavefront sensors and the deformable mirrors placed in the science optical paths. We propose a procedure linking the WFSs in the different directions and measuring directly on-sky the required covariance matrices needed for the reconstructor. We present the theoretical expressions of the turbulence spatial covariance of wavefront slopes allowing one to derive any turbulent covariance matrix between two wavefront sensors. Finally, we discuss the convergence issue on the measured covariance matrices, we propose the fitting of the data based on the theoretical slope covariance using a reduced number of turbulence parameters, and we present the computation of a fully modeled reconstructor.

© 2010 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(010.1080) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Active or adaptive optics
(010.1330) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Atmospheric turbulence

History
Original Manuscript: January 11, 2010
Revised Manuscript: June 1, 2010
Manuscript Accepted: June 28, 2010
Published: October 15, 2010

Citation
Fabrice Vidal, Eric Gendron, and Gérard Rousset, "Tomography approach for multi-object adaptive optics," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 27, A253-A264 (2010)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-27-11-A253


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. R. G. Dekany, M. C. Britton, D. T. Gavel, B. L. Ellerbroek, G. Herriot, C. E. Max, and J. P. Veran, “Adaptive optics requirements definition for TMT,” Proc. SPIE 5490, 879–890 (2004). [CrossRef]
  2. F. Hammer, F. Sayede, E. Gendron, T. Fusco, D. Burgarella, V. Cayatte, J. M. Conan, F. Courbin, H. Flores, I. Guinouard, L. Jocou, A. Lancon, G. Monnet, M. Mouhcine, F. Rigaud, D. Rouan, G. Rousset, V. Buat, and F. Zamkotsian, “The FALCON concept: multi-object spectroscopy combined with MCAO in near-IR,” in Proceedings of the ESO Workshop, 11–15 June 2001, J.Bergeron and G.Monnet, eds. (Springer-Verlag, 2002), pp. 139–149.
  3. J. G. Cuby, S. Morris, I. Bryson, M. Lehnert, C. Evans, T. Fusco, P. Jagourel, R. Myers, G. Rousset, H. Schnetler, J. P. Amans, J. Allington-Smith, F. Assemat, S. Beard, F. Chemla, R. Content, N. Dipper, M. Ferrari, E. Gendron, J. L. Gimenez, P. Hastings, Z. Hubert, E. Hugot, P. Laporte, B. Leroux, F. Madec, B. Neichel, T. Morris, E. Prieto, M. Swinbank, G. Talbot, W. Taylor, F. Vidal, S. Vivs, P. Vola, and M. Wells, “EAGLE: an MOAO fed multi-IFU in the NIR on the E-ELT,” Proc. SPIE 7014, 70141K-1–70141K-11 (2008). [CrossRef]
  4. R. Gilmozzi and J. Spyromillio, “The 42 m European ELT: status,” Proc. SPIE 7012, 701219-1–701219-10 (2008). [CrossRef]
  5. G. Rousset, T. Fusco, F. Assemat, T. Morris, E. Gendron, R. Myers, M. Brangier, M. Cohen, N. Dipper, C. Evans, D. Gratadour, P. Jagourel, P. Laporte, D. Le Mignant, M. Puech, C. Robert, H. Schnetler, W. Taylor, F. Vidal, J.-G. Cuby, M. Lehnert, S. Morris, and P. Parr-Burmann, “EAGLE multi-object AO concept study for the E-ELT,” in 1st AO4ELT Conference: Adaptative Optics for Extremely Large Telescopes, Y.Clénet, J.-M.Conan, T.Fusco, and G.Rousset, eds. (2010), pp. 2008-1–2008-6.
  6. R. M. Myers, Z. Hubert, T. J. Morris, E. Gendron, N. Dipper, A. Kellerer, S. J. Goodsell, G. Rousset, E. Younger, M. Marteaud, A. Basden, F. Chemla, D. Guzman, T. Fusco, D. Geng, B. Le Roux, M. A. Harrison, A. J. Longmore, L. Young, F. Vidal, and A. H. Greenaway, “CANARY: the on-sky NGS/LGS MOAO demonstrator for EAGLE,” Proc. SPIE 7015, 70150E-1–70150-9 (2008). [CrossRef]
  7. F. Vidal, E. Gendron, A. Sevin, A. Kellerer, G. Rousset, Z. Hubert, T. Fusco, C. Petit, and R. M. Myers, “Tomographic tests for MOAO on the SESAME bench,” presented at SPIE Conference on Astronomical Instrumentation, Adaptive Optics Systems, 23–28 June 2008, Marseille, France, talk 7015–12.
  8. F. Vidal, E. Gendron, M. Brangier, A. Sevin, G. Rousset, and Z. Hubert, “Tomography reconstruction using the Learn and Apply algorithm,” in 1st AO4ELT Conference—Adaptive Optics for Extremely Large Telescopes, Y.Clénet, J.-M.Conan, T.Fusco, and G.Rousset, eds. (2010), pp. 7001-1–7001-6. [CrossRef]
  9. B. Le Roux, J. M. Conan, C. Kulcsár, H. F. Raynaud, L. Mugnier, and T. Fusco, “Optimal control law for classical and multiconjugate adaptive optics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 21, 1261–1276 (2004). [CrossRef]
  10. D. Gavel, “Tomography for multiconjugate adaptive optics systems using laser guide stars,” Proc. SPIE 5490, 1356–1373 (2004). [CrossRef]
  11. C. Petit, J. M. Conan, C. Kulcsár, H. F. Raynaud, T. Fusco, J. Montri, and D. Rabaud, “First laboratory demonstration of closed-loop Kalman based optimal control for vibration filtering and simplified MCAO,” Proc. SPIE 6272, 62721T (2006). [CrossRef]
  12. C. Baranec, M. Lloyd-Hart, N. M. Milton, T. Stalcup, M. Snyder, and R. Angel, “Tomographic reconstruction of stellar wavefronts from multiple laser guide stars,” Proc. SPIE 6272, 627203 (2006). [CrossRef]
  13. L. A. Poyneer, M. Troy, B. Macintosh, and D. T. Gavel, “Experimental validation of Fourier-transform wave-front reconstruction at the Palomar Observatory,” Opt. Lett. 28, 798–800 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. D. L. Fried, “Anisoplanatism in Adaptive Optics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 72, 52–61 (1982). [CrossRef]
  15. S. M. Ammons, L. Johnson, E. A. Laag, R. Kupke, D. T. Gavel, B. J. Bauman, and C. E. Max, “Integrated laboratory demonstrations of multi-object adaptive optics on a simulated 10-meter telescope at visible wavelengths,” Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 22, 573–589 (2009).
  16. A. Costille, C. Petit, J. M. Conan, T. Fusco, C. Kulcsár, and H. F. Raynaud, “Optimization of MCAO performances: experimental results on ONERA laboratory MCAO bench,” Proc. SPIE 7015, 701547-1–701547-10 (2008). [CrossRef]
  17. R. Ragazzoni, E. Marchetti, and G. Valente, “Adaptive-optics corrections available for the whole sky,” Nature (London) 403, 54–56 (2000). [CrossRef]
  18. V. Velur, R. C. Flicker, B. C. Platt, M. C. Britton, R. G. Dekany, M. Troy, J. E. Roberts, J. Shelton, and J. Hickey, “Multiple guide star tomography demonstration at Palomar observatory,” Proc. SPIE 6272, 62725C (2006). [CrossRef]
  19. E. Marchetti, R. Brast, B. Delabre, R. Donaldson, E. Fedrigo, C. Frank, N. Hubin, J. Kolb, M. Le Louarn, J. L. Lizon, S. Oberti, F. Quiros-Pacheco, R. Reiss, J. Santos, S. Tordo, A. Baruffolo, P. Bagnara, A. Amorim, and J. Lima, “MAD star oriented laboratory results for ground layer and multi-conjugate adaptive optics,” Proc. SPIE 6272, 62720O (2006). [CrossRef]
  20. E. P. Wallner, “Comparison of wave-front sensor configurations using optimal reconstruction and correction,” Proc. SPIE 351, 42–53 (1982).
  21. C. Boyer, V. Michau, and G. Rousset, “Adaptive optics: interaction matrix measurements and real time control algorithms for the COME ON project,” Proc. SPIE 1237, 406–424 (1990). [CrossRef]
  22. F. Roddier, “The effects of atmospheric turbulence in optical astronomy,” Prog. Opt. 19, 281–376 (1981). [CrossRef]
  23. R. Avila, A. Ziad, J. Borgnino, F. Martin, A. Agabi, and A. Tokovinin, “Theoretical spatiotemporal analysis of angle of arrival induced by atmospheric turbulence as observed with the grating scale monitor experiment,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 3070–3082 (1997). [CrossRef]
  24. D. Marquardt “An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters,” J. Appl. Math. 11, 431–441 (1963).
  25. http://yorick.sourceforge.net.
  26. http://maumae.net/yao/.
  27. R. W. Wilson, “SLODAR: measuring optical turbulence altitude with a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 337, 103–108 (2002). [CrossRef]
  28. B. Neichel, T. Fusco, and J. M. Conan, “Tomographic reconstruction for wide-field adaptive optics systems: Fourier domain analysis and fundamental limitations,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 26, 219-235 (2009). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited