Abstract

The signal measured with a curvature sensor is analyzed. At the outset, we derive the required minimum number of sensing elements at the pupil edges, depending on the total number of sensing elements. The distribution of the sensor signal is further characterized in terms of its mean, variance, kurtosis, and skewness. It is established that while the approximation in terms of a Gaussian distribution is correct down to fairly low photon numbers, much higher numbers are required to obtain meaningful sensor measurements for small wavefront distortions. Finally, we indicate a closed expression for the error propagation factor and for the photon-noise-induced Strehl loss.

© 2010 Optical Society of America

Error propagation: a comparison of Shack–Hartmann and curvature sensors

Aglaé N. Kellerer and Albrecht M. Kellerer
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 28(5) 801-807 (2011)

Automatic sensitivity adjustment for a curvature sensor

Aglae Kellerer, Mark Chun, and Christ Ftaclas
Appl. Opt. 49(31) G140-G147 (2010)

Differential Shack-Hartmann curvature sensor: local principal curvature measurements

Weiyao Zou, Kevin P. Thompson, and Jannick P. Rolland
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 25(9) 2331-2337 (2008)

Wavefront correction with high-order curvature adaptive optics systems

Qiang Yang, Christ Ftaclas, and Mark Chun
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 23(6) 1375-1381 (2006)

Analysis of curvature sensing for large-aperture adaptive optics systems

Mark Milman, David Redding, and Laura Needels
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13(6) 1226-1238 (1996)