OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Editor: Franco Gori
  • Vol. 27, Iss. 2 — Feb. 1, 2010
  • pp: 333–349

On the optimal reconstruction and control of adaptive optical systems with mirror dynamics

Carlos Correia, Henri-François Raynaud, Caroline Kulcsár, and Jean-Marc Conan  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 27, Issue 2, pp. 333-349 (2010)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.27.000333


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (767 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

In adaptive optics (AO) the deformable mirror (DM) dynamics are usually neglected because, in general, the DM can be considered infinitely fast. Such assumption may no longer apply for the upcoming Extremely Large Telescopes (ELTs) with DM that are several meters in diameter with slow and/or resonant responses. For such systems an important challenge is to design an optimal regulator minimizing the variance of the residual phase. In this contribution, the general optimal minimum-variance (MV) solution to the full dynamical reconstruction and control problem of AO systems (AOSs) is established. It can be looked upon as the parent solution from which simpler (used hitherto) suboptimal solutions can be derived as special cases. These include either partial DM-dynamics-free solutions or solutions derived from the static minimum-variance reconstruction (where both atmospheric disturbance and DM dynamics are neglected altogether). Based on a continuous stochastic model of the disturbance, a state-space approach is developed that yields a fully optimal MV solution in the form of a discrete-time linear-quadratic-Gaussian (LQG) regulator design. From this LQG standpoint, the control-oriented state-space model allows one to (1) derive the optimal state-feedback linear regulator and (2) evaluate the performance of both the optimal and the sub-optimal solutions. Performance results are given for weakly damped second-order oscillatory DMs with large-amplitude resonant responses, in conditions representative of an ELT AO system. The highly energetic optical disturbance caused on the tip/tilt (TT) modes by the wind buffeting is considered. Results show that resonant responses are correctly handled with the MV regulator developed here. The use of sub-optimal regulators results in prohibitive performance losses in terms of residual variance; in addition, the closed-loop system may become unstable for resonant frequencies in the range of interest.

© 2010 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(010.1080) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Active or adaptive optics
(100.3190) Image processing : Inverse problems
(230.4040) Optical devices : Mirrors

ToC Category:
Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics

History
Original Manuscript: September 17, 2009
Revised Manuscript: November 26, 2009
Manuscript Accepted: December 4, 2009
Published: January 29, 2010

Citation
Carlos Correia, Henri-François Raynaud, Caroline Kulcsár, and Jean-Marc Conan, "On the optimal reconstruction and control of adaptive optical systems with mirror dynamics," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 27, 333-349 (2010)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-27-2-333


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. F. Roddier, Adaptive Optics in Astronomy (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1999). [CrossRef]
  2. J. Herrmann, “Phase variance and Strehl ratio in adaptive optics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 2257-2258 (1992). [CrossRef]
  3. Front matter, Proc. SPIE 7018, 701801 (2008).
  4. R. Paschall, M. Von Bokern, and B. Welsh, “Design of a linear quadratic Gaussian controller for an adaptive optics system,” in Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Vol. 2, (IEEE, 1991), pp. 1761-1769. [CrossRef]
  5. B. Le Roux, J.-M. Conan, C. Kulcsár, H.-F. Raynaud, L. M. Mugnier, and T. Fusco, “Optimal control law for classical and multiconjugate adaptive optics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 21, 1261-1276 (2004). [CrossRef]
  6. C. Kulcsár, H.-F. Raynaud, C. Petit, J.-M. Conan, and P. V. de Lesegno, “Optimal control, observers and integrators in adaptive optics,” Opt. Express 14, 7464-7476 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. L. A. Poyneer, B. A. Macintosh, and J.-P. Véran, “Fourier transform wavefront control with adaptive prediction of the atmosphere,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24, 2645-2660 (2007). [CrossRef]
  8. D. P. Looze, “Discrete-time model of an adaptive optics systems,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24, 2850-2863 (2007). [CrossRef]
  9. D. P. Looze, “Linear-quadratic-Gaussian control for adaptive optics systems using a hybrid model,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 26, 1-9 (2009). [CrossRef]
  10. C. Correia, H.-F. Raynaud, C. Kulcsár, and J.-M. Conan, “Globally optimal minimum variance control in adaptive optical systems with mirror dynamics,” Proc. SPIE 7015, 70151F (2008). [CrossRef]
  11. Y. Bar-Shalom and E. Tse, “Dual effect, certainty equivalence, and separation in stochastic control,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 19, 494-500 (1974). [CrossRef]
  12. P. D. Joseph and J. T. Tou, “On linear control theory,” AIEE Trans. Appl. Industry 80, 193-196 (1961).
  13. B. D. O. Anderson and J. B. Moore, Optimal Control, Linear Quadratic Methods (Dover, 1995).
  14. E. Gendron and P. Lena, “Astronomical adaptive optics. 1: Modal control optimization,” Astron. Astrophys. 291, 337-347 (1994).
  15. C. Petit, F. Quiros-Pacheco, J.-M. Conan, C. Kulcsár, H.-F. Raynaud, T. Fusco, and G. Rousset, “Kalman-filter-based control for adaptive optics,” Proc. SPIE 5490, 1414-1425 (2004). [CrossRef]
  16. C. Petit, “Etude de la commande optimale en OA et OAMC, validation numérique et expérimentale,” Ph.D. thesis (E. D. Galilée, Univ. Paris XIII, 2006).
  17. C. Petit, J.-M. Conan, C. Kulcsár, H.-F. Raynaud, and T. Fusco, “First laboratory validation of vibration filtering with LQG control law for adaptive optics,” Opt. Express 16, 87-97 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. T. Söderström, Discrete-time Stochastic Systems, Advanced Textbooks in Control and Signal Processing (Springer-Verlag, 2002). [CrossRef]
  19. B. D. O. Anderson and J. B. Moore, Optimal Filtering (Dover, 1995).
  20. I. I. Gikhman and A. V. Skorokhod, Introduction to the Theory of Random Processes (Dover, 2006).
  21. R. J. Noll, “Zernike polynomials and atmospheric turbulence,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66, 207-211 (1976). [CrossRef]
  22. R. Arsenault, R. Biasi, D. Gallieni, A. Riccardi, P. Lazzarini, N. Hubin, E. Fedrigo, R. Donaldson, S. Oberti, S. Stroebele, R. Conzelmann, and M. Duchateau, “A deformable secondary mirror for the VLT,” Proc. SPIE 6272, 62720V (2006). [CrossRef]
  23. B. Sedghi, “E-ELT main axis control analysis,” Issue 3, Tech. Rep. (European Southern Observatory, 2007).
  24. A. Beghi, A. Cenedese, and A. Masiero, “Stochastic realization approach to the efficient simulation of phase screens,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 25, 515-525 (2008). [CrossRef]
  25. K. Hinnen, M. Verhaegen, and N. Doelman, “Exploiting the spatiotemporal correlation in adaptive optics using data-driven H2-optimal control,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24, 1714-1725 (2007). [CrossRef]
  26. J.-M. Conan, G. Rousset, and P.-Y. Madec, “Wave-front temporal spectra in high-resolution imaging through turbulence,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12, 1559-1570 (1995). [CrossRef]
  27. R. Gasmi, J. C. Sinquin, P. Jagourel, J. L. Dournaux, D. L. Bihan, and F. Hammer, “Modeling of a large deformable mirror for future E-ELT,” Proc. SPIE 7017, 70171Z (2008). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited