OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Editor: Franco Gori
  • Vol. 28, Iss. 10 — Oct. 1, 2011
  • pp: 2033–2048

From CIE 2006 physiological model to improved age-dependent and average colorimetric observers

Abhijit Sarkar, Florent Autrusseau, Françoise Viénot, Patrick Le Callet, and Laurent Blondé  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 28, Issue 10, pp. 2033-2048 (2011)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1623 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



In the context of color perception on modern wide-gamut displays with narrowband spectral primaries, we performed a theoretical analysis on various aspects of physiological observers proposed by CIE TC 1-36 (CIEPO06). We allowed certain physiological factors to vary, which was not considered in the CIEPO06 framework. For example, we analyzed that the long-wave-sensitive (LWS) or medium-wave-sensitive (MWS) peak wavelength shift in the photopigment absorption spectra, a factor not modeled in CIEPO06, contributed more toward observer variability than some of the factors considered in the model. Further, we compared the color-matching functions derived from the CIEPO06 model and the CIE 10 ° standard colorimetric observer to the average observer data from three distinct subgroups of Stiles–Burch observers, formed on the basis of observer ages (22–23 years, 27–29 years, and 49–50 years). The errors in predicting the x ¯ ( λ ) and y ¯ ( λ ) color-matching functions of the intragroup average observers in the long-wave range and in the medium-wave range, respectively, were generally more in the case of the CIEPO06 model compared to the 10 ° standard colorimetric observer and manifested in both spectral and chromaticity space. In contrast, the short-wave-sensitive z ¯ 10 ( λ ) function of the 10 ° standard colorimetric observer performed poorly compared to the CIEPO06 model for all three subgroups. Finally, a constrained nonlinear optimization on the CIEPO06 model outputs showed that a peak wavelength shift of photopigment density alone could not improve the model prediction errors at higher wavelengths. As an alternative, two optimized weighting functions for each of the LWS and MWS cone photopigment densities led to significant improvement in the prediction of intra-age-group average data for both the 22–23 year and 49–50 year age groups. We hypothesize that the assumption in the CIEPO06 model that the peak optical density of visual pigments does not vary with age is false and is the source of these prediction errors at higher wavelengths. Correcting these errors in the model can lead to an improved age-dependent observer and can also help update the current CIE 10 ° standard colorimetric observer. Accordingly, it would reduce the discrepancies between color matches with broadband spectral primaries and color matches with narrowband spectral primaries.

© 2011 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(120.2040) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Displays
(330.0330) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision, color, and visual optics
(330.1720) Vision, color, and visual optics : Color vision
(330.1730) Vision, color, and visual optics : Colorimetry
(330.5310) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision - photoreceptors
(330.1715) Vision, color, and visual optics : Color, rendering and metamerism

ToC Category:
Vision, Color, and Visual Optics

Original Manuscript: June 10, 2011
Manuscript Accepted: August 2, 2011
Published: September 12, 2011

Virtual Issues
Vol. 6, Iss. 11 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Abhijit Sarkar, Florent Autrusseau, Françoise Viénot, Patrick Le Callet, and Laurent Blondé, "From CIE 2006 physiological model to improved age-dependent and average colorimetric observers," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 28, 2033-2048 (2011)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. W. D. Wright, “A re-determination of the trichromatic coefficients of the spectral colors,” Trans. Opt. Soc. 30, 141–164(1929). [CrossRef]
  2. J. Guild, “The colorimetric properties of the spectrum,” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 230, 149–187 (1932). [CrossRef]
  3. CIE, Sixième Session, Genève, Juillet, 1924, Recueil des Travaux et Compte Rendu de Séances (Cambridge University, 1926), pp 67–69.
  4. R. S. Berns, Billmeyer and Saltzman’s Principles of Color Technology, 3rd ed. (Wiley, 2000).
  5. V. C. Smith and J. Pokorny, “Color matching and color discrimination,” in The Science of Color, 2nd ed, S.K.Shevell, ed. (Elsevier, , 2003), pp. 103–148. [CrossRef]
  6. D. B. Judd, “Colorimetry and artificial daylight,” in Technical Committee No. 7 Report of Secretariat United States Commission (International Commission on Illumination, 1951), pp. 1–60.
  7. J. J. Vos, “Colorimetric and photometric properties of a 2° fundamental observer,” Color Res. Appl. 3, 125–128 (1978). [CrossRef]
  8. CIE 1988, “2° spectral luminous efficiency function for photopic vision,” CIE 86-1990 (Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage, 1990).
  9. W. S. Stiles and J. M. Burch, “N.P.L. colour-matching investigation: final report,” Opt. Acta 6, 1–26 (1959). [CrossRef]
  10. N. I. Speranskaya, “Determination of spectral color co-ordinates for twenty-seven normal observers,” Opt. Spectrosc. 7, 424–428(1959).
  11. “Fundamental chromaticity diagram with physiological axes–Part I,” CIE Technical Report 170-1 (CIE, 2006).
  12. A. Stockman and L. T. Sharpe, “The spectral sensitivities of the middle- and long- wavelengthsensitive cones derived from measurements in observers of known genotype,” Vision Res. 40, 1711–1737 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. A. Stockman, D. I. A. MacLeod, and N. E. Johnson, “Spectral sensitivities of human cones,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 2491–2521(1993). [CrossRef]
  14. D. I. A. MacLeod and M. A. Webster, “Factors influencing the color matches of normal observers,” in Colour Vision: Physiology and Psychophysics, J.D.Mollon and L.T.Sharpe, eds. (Academic, 1983), pp. 81–92.
  15. V. C. Smith, J. Pokorny, and Q. Zaidi, “How do sets of color-matching functions differ?” in Colour Vision: Physiology and Psychophysics, J.D.Mollon and L.T.Sharpe, eds. (Academic, 1983).
  16. F. Viénot, “Relations between inter- and intra-individual variability of color matching functions. experimental results,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 70, 1476–1483 (1980). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. G. Wyszecki and W. S. Stiles, Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae, 2nd ed. (Wiley, 1982).
  18. A. North and M. Fairchild, “Measuring color-matching functions. Part I,” Color Res. Appl. 18, 155–162 (1993). [CrossRef]
  19. A. North and M. Fairchild, “Measuring color-matching functions. Part II. New data for assessing observer metamerism,” Color Res. Appl. 18, 163–170 (1993). [CrossRef]
  20. B. Oicherman, M. R. Luo, B. Rigg, and A. R. Robertson, “Effect of observer metamerism on colour matching of display and surface colours,” Color Res. Appl. 33, 346–359 (2008). [CrossRef]
  21. C. Oleari and M. Pavesi, “Grassmann’s laws and individual color-matching functions for nonspectral primaries evaluated by maximum saturation technique in foveal vision,” Color Res. Appl. 33, 271–281 (2008). [CrossRef]
  22. Y. Nakano, Y. Nakayasu, H. Morita, K. Suehara, J. Kohda, and T. Yano, “Individual difference of color matching functions and its cause,” presented at the ISCC/CIE Expert Symposium, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 16–17 May 2006.
  23. J. Neitz and G. H. Jacobs, “Polymorphism in normal human color vision and its mechanism,” Vision Res. 30, 621–636 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. J. C. He and S. K. Shevell, “Individual differences in cone photopigments of normal trichromats measured by dual Raleigh-type color matches,” Vision Res. 34, 367–376 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. F. Viénot, L. Serreault, and P. P. Fernandez, “Convergence of experimental multiple Rayleigh matches to peak L- and M-photopigment sensitivity estimates,” Visual Neurosci. 23, 1–8 (2006). [CrossRef]
  26. J. L. Barbur, M. Rodriguez-Carmona, J. A. Harlow, K. Mancuso, J. Neitz, and M. Neitz, “A study of unusual Rayleigh matches in deutan deficiency,” Visual Neurosci. 25, 507–516(2008). [CrossRef]
  27. P. B. M. Thomas and J. D. Mollon, “Modelling the Rayleigh match,” Visual Neurosci. 21, 477–482 (2004). [CrossRef]
  28. P. Csuti and J. Schanda, “Colour matching experiments with RGB-LEDs,” Color Res. Appl. 33, 108–112 (2008). [CrossRef]
  29. M. A. Webster, “Reanalysis of λmax variations in the Stiles-Burch 10° color-matching functions,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 1419–1421(1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. L. T. Sharpe, A. Stockman, H. Jägle, and J. Nathans, “Opsin genes, cone photopigments, color vision, and color blindness,” in Color Vision: From Genes to Perception, 1st ed., K.R.Gegenfurtner, L.T.Sharpe, and B. B. Boycott, eds. (Cambridge University, 2001), pp. 3–52.
  31. A. Sarkar, L. Blondé, P. L. Callet, F. Autrusseau, J. Stauder, and P. Morvan, “Study of observer variability in modern display colorimetry: an analysis of CIE 2006 model,” in Proceedings of the 11th Congress of the International Colour Association (AIC), D.Smith, P.Green-Armytage, M.A.Pope, and N.Harkness, eds. (CD) (Colour Society of Australia, 2009).
  32. V. C. Smith and J. Pokorny, “Chromatic-discrimination axes, CRT phosphor spectra and individual variation in color vision,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12, 27–35 (1995). [CrossRef]
  33. O. Packer and D. R. Williams, “Light, the retinal image and photoreceptors,” in The Science of Color, 2nd ed., S.K.Shevell, ed. (Elsevier, 2003), pp. 41–102. [CrossRef]
  34. V. C. Smith and J. Pokorny, “The design and use of a cone-chromaticity space,” Color Res. Appl. 21, 375–383 (1996). [CrossRef]
  35. E. Miyahara, V. C. Smith, and J. Pokorny, “How surrounds affect chromatic discrimination,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 545–553(1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. D. I. A. MacLeod and R. M. Boynton, “Chromaticity diagram showing cone excitation by stimuli of equal luminance,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 69, 1183–1185 (1979). [CrossRef]
  37. R. M. Boynton and N. Kambe, “Chromatic difference steps of moderate size measured along theoretically critical axes,” Color Res. Appl. 5, 13–23 (1980). [CrossRef]
  38. A. Stockman, Colour & Vision Research Laboratory website, http://www.cvrl.org/.
  39. J. Pokorny, V. C. Smith, and M. Lutze, “Aging of the human lens,” Appl. Opt. 26, 1437–1440 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. P. Csuti and J. Schanda, “A better description of metameric experience of LED clusters,” in Proceedings of Light and Lighting Conference with Special Emphasis on LEDs and Solid State Lighting (Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage, 2009).
  41. A. E. Elsner, L. Berk, S. A. Burns, and P. R. Rosenberg, “Aging and human cone photopigments,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5, 2106–2112 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. W. H. Swanson and G. E. Fish, “Age-related changes in the colour-match-area effect,” Vision Res. 36, 2079–2085 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. A. B. Renner, H. Knau, M. Neitz, J. Neitz, and J. S. Werner, “Photopigment optical density of the human foveola and a paradoxical senescent increase outside the fovea,” Visual Neurosci, 21, 827–834 (2004). [CrossRef]
  44. M. A. Webster and D. I. A. MacLeod, “Factors underlying individual-differences in the color matches of normal observers,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5, 1722–1735 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. V. C. Smith, J. Pokorny, and S. J. Starr, “Variability of color mixture data—I. Interobserver variability in the unit coordinates,” Vision Res. 16, 1087–1094 (1976). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited