OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Editor: Franco Gori
  • Vol. 28, Iss. 3 — Mar. 1, 2011
  • pp: 391–400

Partial spatial coherence and partial polarization in random evanescent fields on lossless interfaces

Andreas Norrman, Tero Setälä, and Ari T. Friberg  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 28, Issue 3, pp. 391-400 (2011)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (628 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



We consider partial spatial coherence and partial polarization of purely evanescent optical fields generated in total internal reflection at an interface of two dielectric (lossless) media. Making use of the electromagnetic degree of coherence, we show that, in such fields, the coherence length can be notably shorter than the light’s vacuum wavelength, especially at a high-index-contrast interface. Physical explanation for this behavior, analogous to the generation of incoherent light in a multimode laser, is provided. We also analyze the degree of polarization by using a recent three-dimensional formulation and show that the field may be partially polarized at a subwavelength distance from the surface even though it is fully polarized farther away. The degree of polarization can assume values unattainable by beamlike fields, indicating that electromagnetic evanescent waves generally are genuine three-dimensional fields. The results can find applications in near-field optics and nanophotonics.

© 2011 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(030.1640) Coherence and statistical optics : Coherence
(240.6690) Optics at surfaces : Surface waves
(260.5430) Physical optics : Polarization

ToC Category:
Coherence and Statistical Optics

Original Manuscript: November 22, 2010
Manuscript Accepted: December 23, 2010
Published: February 23, 2011

Andreas Norrman, Tero Setälä, and Ari T. Friberg, "Partial spatial coherence and partial polarization in random evanescent fields on lossless interfaces," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 28, 391-400 (2011)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. J. T. Foley, W. H. Carter, and E. Wolf, “Field correlations within a completely incoherent primary spherical source,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 3, 1090–1096 (1986). [CrossRef]
  2. J. T. Foley, K. Kim, and H. M. Nussenzveig, “Field correlations within a Bessel-correlated spherical source,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5, 1694–1708 (1988). [CrossRef]
  3. K. Blomstedt, T. Setälä, and A. T. Friberg, “Arbitrarily short coherence length within finite lossless source regions,” Phys. Rev. E 75, 026610 (2007). [CrossRef]
  4. R. Carminati and J.-J. Greffet, “Near-field effects in spatial coherence of thermal sources,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1660–1663 (1999). [CrossRef]
  5. A. V. Shchegrov, K. Joulain, R. Carminati, and J.-J. Greffet, “Near-field spectral effects due to electromagnetic surface excitations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1548–1551 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. T. Setälä, M. Kaivola, and A. T. Friberg, “Degree of polarization in near fields of thermal sources: effects of surface waves,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 123902 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. R. J. Collier, C. B. Burckhardt, and L. H. Lin, Optical Holography (Academic, 1971), Sec. 7.1.3.
  8. T. Setälä, A. Shevchenko, M. Kaivola, and A. T. Friberg, “Degree of polarization for optical near fields,” Phys. Rev. E 66, 016615 (2002). [CrossRef]
  9. C. Brosseau and A. Dogariu, “Symmetry properties and polarization description for an arbitrary electromagnetic wavefield,” in Vol.  49 of Progress in Optics, E.Wolf, ed. (Elsevier, 2006), p. 315. [CrossRef]
  10. J. J. Gil, “Polarimetric characterization of light and media: physical quantities involved in polarimetric phenomena,” Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 40, 1–47 (2007). [CrossRef]
  11. T. Setälä, K. Lindfors, and A. T. Friberg, “Degree of polarization in 3D optical fields generated from a partially polarized plane wave,” Opt. Lett. 34, 3394–3396 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics (Cambridge University, 1995).
  13. C. Brosseau, Fundamentals of Polarized Light: A Statistical Optics Approach (Wiley, 1998).
  14. J. Tervo, T. Setälä, and A. T. Friberg, “Theory of partially coherent electromagnetic fields in the space-frequency domain,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 21, 2205–2215 (2004). [CrossRef]
  15. J. Tervo, T. Setälä, and A. T. Friberg, “Degree of coherence for electromagnetic fields,” Opt. Express 11, 1137–1143 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. T. Setälä, J. Tervo, and A. T. Friberg, “Complete electromagnetic coherence in the space-frequency domain,” Opt. Lett. 29, 328–330 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. T. Setälä, J. Tervo, and A. T. Friberg, “Contrasts of Stokes parameters in Young’s interference experiment and electromagnetic degree of coherence,” Opt. Lett. 31, 2669–2671 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. R. Martínez-Herrero, P. M. Mejias, and G. Piquero, Characterization of Partially Polarized Light Fields (Springer–Verlag, 2009). [CrossRef]
  19. L. Novotny and B. Hecht, Principles of Nano-Optics (Cambridge University, 2006).
  20. F. de Fornel, Evanescent Waves: From Newtonian Optics to Atomic Optics (Springer–Verlag, 2001).
  21. The form of the Fresnel coefficient for p polarization given in Eq.  is valid only for an evanescent wave. For propagating waves, the factor 2n˜2γ2+1 is absent in the numerator. However, the factor follows directly from the boundary conditions, if the (complex) vector p^2 related to the evanescent wave is normalized to unity. For example, in , the square-root factor is missing since in those treatments p^2 is not normalized; more precisely, p^2*·p^2≠1 but instead p^2·p^2=1. The form of tp given in Eq.  preserves the physical meaning of the Fresnel coefficients as the ratio of the complex amplitudes on the opposite sides of the surface. See also .
  22. J. E. Sipe, “New Green-function formalism for surface optics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 4, 481–489 (1987). [CrossRef]
  23. The p-polarized amplitude of the evanescent wave looks different from that given in , but it is the same. The variances in the appearance originate from the differences in the Fresnel coefficients for the p-polarized light. However, for the Fresnel coefficient in Eq. , the energy density of the p-polarized evanescent wave is of the intuitive form given in Eq. . For the evanescent wave of , the energy density contains an additional factor, wp=|tp|2|Ep|2(2n˜2γ2+1). See also above.
  24. D. Courjon, Near-Field Microscopy and Near-Field Optics(Imperial College, 2003).
  25. E. D. Palik, Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids(Academic, 1998).
  26. L. Józefowski, J. Fiutowski, T. Kawalec, and H.-G. Rubahn, “Direct measurement of the evanescent-wave polarization state,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 24, 624–628 (2007). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
Fig. 4 Fig. 5

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited