OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Editor: Franco Gori
  • Vol. 28, Iss. 7 — Jul. 1, 2011
  • pp: 1445–1452

Decoding of depth and motion in ambiguous binocular perception

Ko Sakai, Mitsuharu Ogiya, and Yuzo Hirai  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 28, Issue 7, pp. 1445-1452 (2011)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.28.001445


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (571 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We have shown previously that random dots with an interocular time delay (ITD), the time difference of the onset of dots between the two eyes, yield both apparent depth and motion, although depth and velocity are covariant and, thus, ITD is inherently ambiguous. The depth of random dots with ITD was proportional to ITD, suggesting that the visual system assumes a constant velocity of the dots and determines depth on the basis of this constant velocity. We performed psychophysical experiments to investigate whether subjects perceive a constant velocity with a variety of ITDs in random dots aligned along a single vertical line that ensures neither apparent motion nor accidental disparity between the dots. The results showed that subjects perceive a constant velocity for a variety of ITDs with simultaneous perception of depth in proportion to ITD, indicating the priority of depth over velocity in ambiguous binocular perception derived from ITD.

© 2011 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.1400) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision - binocular and stereopsis
(330.4060) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision modeling
(330.5020) Vision, color, and visual optics : Perception psychology

ToC Category:
Vision, Color, and Visual Optics

History
Original Manuscript: November 2, 2010
Revised Manuscript: May 4, 2011
Manuscript Accepted: May 14, 2011
Published: June 20, 2011

Virtual Issues
Vol. 6, Iss. 8 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Citation
Ko Sakai, Mitsuharu Ogiya, and Yuzo Hirai, "Decoding of depth and motion in ambiguous binocular perception," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 28, 1445-1452 (2011)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-28-7-1445


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. K. Nakayama and S. Shimojo, “da Vinci stereopsis: depth and subjective occluding contours from unpaired image points,” Vision Res. 30, 1811–25 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. M. Kaye, “Stereoposis without binocular correlation,” Vision Res. 18, 1013–1022 (1978). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. J. Ross, “Stereopsis by binocular delay,” Nature 248, 363–364(1974). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. C. F. Michaels, C. Carello, B. Shapiro, and C. Steitz, “An onset to onset rule for binocular integration in the Mach-Dvorak illusion,” Vision Res. 17, 1107–1113 (1977). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. M. J. Morgan, “Perception of continuity in stroboscopic motion: a temporal frequency analysis,” Vision Res. 19, 491–500(1979). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. J. C. Read and B. G. Cumming, “The stroboscopic Pulfrich effect is not evidence for the joint encoding of motion and depth,” J. Vision 5, 417–434 (2005). [CrossRef]
  7. C. W. Tyler, “Stereopsis in dynamic visual noise,” Nature 250, 781–782 (1974). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. C. W. Tyler, “Stereomovement from interocular delay in dynamic visual noise: a random spatial disparity hypothesis,” Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 54, 374–386 (1977). [PubMed]
  9. A. Anzai, I. Ohzawa, and R. D. Freeman, “Neural mechanisms for processing binocular information I. Simple cells,” J. Neurophysiol. 82, 891–908 (1999). [PubMed]
  10. C. C. Pack, R. T. Born, and M. S. Livingstone, “Two-dimensional substructure of stereo and motion interactions in macaque visual cortex,” Neuron 37, 525–535 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. N. Qian and R. A. Andersen, “A physiological model for motion-stereo integration and a unified explanation of Pulfrich-like phenomena,” Vision Res. 37, 1683–1698 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. J. C. Read and B. G. Cumming, “Effect of interocular delay on disparity-selective V1 neurons: relationship to stereoacuity and the Pulfrich effect,” J. Neurophysiol. 94, 1541–1553 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. R. Perez, F. Gonzalez, M. S. Justo, and C. Ulibarrena, “Interocular temporal delay sensitivity in the visual cortex of the awake monkey,” Eur. J. Neurosci. 11, 2593–2595 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. J. C. Read and B. G. Cumming, “All Pulfrich-like illusions can be explained without joint encoding of motion and disparity,” J. Vision 5, 901–927 (2005). [CrossRef]
  15. K. Sakai, M. Ogiya, and Y. Hirai, “Perception of depth and motion from ambiguous binocular information,” Vision Res. 45, 2471–2480 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. A. Anzai, I. Ohzawa, and R. D. Freeman, “Joint-encoding of motion and depth by visual cortical neurons: neural basis of the Pulfrich effect,” Nat. Neurosci. 4, 513–518 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. D. S. Falk and R. Williams, “Dynamic visual noise and the stereophenomenon: Interocular time delays, depth, and coherent velocities,” Percept. Psychophys. 28, 19–27 (1980). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. J. Ross and J. H. Hogben, “Short-term memory in stereopsis,” Vision Res. 14, 1195–1201 (1974). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. J. Ross, “The resources of binocular perception,” Sci. Am. 234, 80–86 (1976). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. B. Efron and R. J. Tibshirani, An Introduction to the Bootstrap (Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, 1993).
  21. K. Sakai and M. Ogiya, “Perception of depth and motion from ambiguous binocular information,” J. Vision 4, 459a (2004) (Abstract). [CrossRef]
  22. K. Sakai and S. Katsumata, “Simultaneous determination of depth and motion in early vision,” Neurocomputing 70, 1819–1823 (2007). [CrossRef]
  23. T. Uka and G. C. DeAngelis, “Contribution of middle temporal area to coarse depth discrimination: comparison of neuronal and psychophysical sensitivity,” J. Neurosci. 23, 3515–3530(2003). [PubMed]
  24. B. Rokers, L. K. Cormack, and A. C. Huk, “Disparity- and velocity-based signals for three-dimensional motion perception in human MT+,” Nat. Neurosci. 12, 1050–1055 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. D. C. Bradley, G. C. Chang, and R. A. Andersen, “Encoding of three-dimensional structure-from-motion by primate area MT neurons,” Nature 392, 714–717 (1998). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. X. Huang, T. D. Albright, and G. R. Stoner, “Adaptive surround modulation in cortical area MT,” Neuron 53, 761–770 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. K. Sakai and H. Nishimura, “Surrounding suppression and facilitation in the determination of border ownership,” J. Cogn. Neurosci. 18, 562–579 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited