OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Editor: Franco Gori
  • Vol. 28, Iss. 8 — Aug. 1, 2011
  • pp: 1620–1635

Improved 2D vector field estimation using probabilistic weights

Archontis Giannakidis and Maria Petrou  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 28, Issue 8, pp. 1620-1635 (2011)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.28.001620


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (2039 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We consider the application of tomography to the reconstruction of two-dimensional vector fields. The most practical sensor configuration in such problems is the regular positioning along the boundary of the reconstruction domain. However, such a configuration does not result in uniform distribution in the Radon parameter space, which is a necessary requirement to achieve accurate reconstruction results. On the other hand, sampling the projection space uniformly imposes serious constraints on space or time. In this paper, we propose to place the sensors regularly along the boundary of the reconstruction domain and employ probabilistic weights with the purpose of compensating for the lack of uniformity in the distribution of projection space parameters. Simulation results demonstrate that, when the proposed probabilistic weights are employed, an average 27% decrease in the reconstruction error may be achieved, over the case that projection measurements are not weighed (e.g., in one case the error reduces from 3.7% to 2.6%). When compared with the case where actual uniform sampling of the projection space is employed, the proposed method achieves a 90 times reduction in the number of the required sensors or 180 times reduction in the total scanning time, with only 7% increase in the error with which the vector field is estimated.

© 2011 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(100.3190) Image processing : Inverse problems
(100.6950) Image processing : Tomographic image processing
(110.6960) Imaging systems : Tomography
(110.6955) Imaging systems : Tomographic imaging
(110.3010) Imaging systems : Image reconstruction techniques

ToC Category:
Imaging Systems

History
Original Manuscript: February 25, 2011
Revised Manuscript: May 6, 2011
Manuscript Accepted: May 8, 2011
Published: July 13, 2011

Virtual Issues
Vol. 6, Iss. 9 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Citation
Archontis Giannakidis and Maria Petrou, "Improved 2D vector field estimation using probabilistic weights," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 28, 1620-1635 (2011)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-28-8-1620


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. S. P. Juhlin, “Doppler tomography,” in Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC, 1993), pp. 212–213. [CrossRef]
  2. Y. K. Tao, A. M. Davis, and J. A. Izatt, “Single-pass volumetric bidirectional blood flow imaging spectral domain optical coherence tomography using a modified Hilbert transform,” Opt. Express 16, 12350–12361 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. N. P. Efremov, N. P. Poluektov, and V. N. Kharchenko, “Tomography of ion and atom velocities in plasmas,” J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 53, 723–728 (1995). [CrossRef]
  4. B. M. Howe, P. F. Worcester, and R. C. Spindel, “Ocean acoustic tomography: mesoscale velocity,” J. Geophys. Res. 92, 3785–3806 (1987). [CrossRef]
  5. W. Munk and C. Wunsch, “Observing the ocean in the 1990s,” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 307, 439–464 (1982). [CrossRef]
  6. D. Rouseff, K. B. Winters, and T. E. Ewart, “Reconstruction of oceanic microstructure by tomography: a numerical feasibility study,” J. Geophys. Res. 96, 8823–8833 (1991). [CrossRef]
  7. S. A. Johnson, J. F. Greenleaf, M. Tanaka, and G. Flandro, “Reconstructing three-dimensional temperature and fluid velocity vector fields from acoustic transmission measurements,” ISA Trans. 16, 3–15 (1977).
  8. D. M. Kramer and P. C. Lauterbur, “On the problem of reconstructing images of non-scalar parameters from projections. Applications to vector fields,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 26, 2674–2677 (1979). [CrossRef]
  9. S. J. Norton and M. Linzer, “Correcting for ray refraction in velocity and attenuation tomography: a perturbation approach,” Ultrason. Imag. 4, 201–233 (1982). [CrossRef]
  10. S. J. Norton, “Tomographic reconstruction of 2-D vector fields: application to flow imaging,” Geophys. J. Int. 97, 161–168 (1989). [CrossRef]
  11. S. J. Norton, “Unique tomographic reconstruction of vector fields using boundary data,” IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1, 406–412 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. H. Braun and A. Hauck, “Tomographic reconstruction of vector fields,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 39, 464–471 (1991). [CrossRef]
  13. K. B. Winters and D. Rouseff, “A filtered backprojection method for the tomographic reconstruction of fluid vorticity,” Inverse Probl. 6, L33–L38 (1990). [CrossRef]
  14. K. B. Winters and D. Rouseff, “Tomographic reconstruction of stratified fluid flow,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 40, 26–33 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. H. K. Aben, “Kerr effect tomography for general axisymmetric field,” Appl. Opt. 26, 2921–2924 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. G. W. Faris and R. L. Byer, “Three-dimensional beam-deflection optical tomography of a supersonic jet,” Appl. Opt. 27, 5202–5212 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. H. M. Hertz, “Kerr effect tomography for nonintrusive spatially resolved measurements of asymmetric electric field distributions,” Appl. Opt. 25, 914–921 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. M. Zahn, “Transform relationship between Kerr-effect optical phase shift and non-uniform electric field distributions,” IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 1, 235–246 (1994). [CrossRef]
  19. V. A. Sharafutdinov, “Tomographic problem of photoelasticity,” Proc. SPIE 1843, 234–243 (1992). [CrossRef]
  20. H. Aben and A. Puro, “Photoelastic tomography for three-dimensional flow birefringence studies,” Inverse Probl. 13, 215–221 (1997). [CrossRef]
  21. S. E. Segre, “The measurement of poloidal magnetic field in a tokamak by the change of polarization of an electromagnetic wave,” Plasma Phys. 20, 295–307 (1978). [CrossRef]
  22. A. Schwarz, “Three-dimensional reconstruction of temperature and velocity fields in a furnace,” Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 12, 75–80 (1995). [CrossRef]
  23. P. Juhlin, “Principles of Doppler tomography,” LUTFD2/(TFMA-92)/7002+17P, Lund Institute of Technology, Sweden, 1992.
  24. L. Desbat and A. Wernsdorfer, “Direct algebraic reconstruction and optimal sampling in vector field tomography,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 43, 1798–1808 (1995). [CrossRef]
  25. T. Sato, H. Aoki, and O. Ikeda, “Introduction of mass conservation law to improve the tomographic estimation of flow-velocity distribution from differential time-of-flight data,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77, 2104–2106 (1985). [CrossRef]
  26. I. Jovanovic, L. Sbaiz, and M. Vetterli, “Acoustic tomography for scalar and vector fields: theory and application to temperature and wind estimation,” J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 26, 1475–1492(2009). [CrossRef]
  27. D. Rouseff and K. B. Winters, “Two-dimensional vector flow inversion by diffraction tomography,” Inverse Probl. 10, 687–697 (1994). [CrossRef]
  28. M. Petrou and A. Giannakidis, “Complete tomographic reconstruction of 2-D vector fields using discrete integral data,” Comp. J. (to be published). [CrossRef]
  29. S. R. Deans, The Radon Transform and Some of Its Applications (Wiley, 1983).
  30. A. Papoulis, Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, 1984).
  31. A. Giannakidis and M. Petrou, “Sampling bounds for 2D vector field tomography,” J. Math. Imaging Vision 37, 151–165 (2010). [CrossRef]
  32. J. Hadamard, “Sur les problèmes aux dérivées partielles et leur signification physique,” Princeton University Bulletin 13, 49–52(1902).
  33. C. F. Gauss, Theoria Motus Corporum Coelestium (Perthes, 1809).
  34. I. N. Bronshtein, K. A. Semendyayev, G. Musiol, and H. Muehlig, Handbook of Mathematics (Springer, 2003).
  35. H. R. Schwarz, Numerische Mathematik (B. G. Teubner, 1986).
  36. H. Schwetlick and H. Kretzschmar, Numerische Verfahren fur Naturwissenschaftler und Ingenieure (Fachbuchverlag, 1991).
  37. M. Petrou and A. Kadyrov, “Affine invariant features from the trace transform,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 26, 30–44 (2004). [CrossRef]
  38. A. Kadyrov and M. Petrou, “Affine parameter estimation from the trace transform,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 28, 1631–1645 (2006). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited