OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Editor: Franco Gori
  • Vol. 28, Iss. 9 — Sep. 1, 2011
  • pp: 1796–1804

Trajectories by a blurred auxiliary system

Iftach Klapp and David Mendlovic  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 28, Issue 9, pp. 1796-1804 (2011)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.28.001796


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1539 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Simple optical imaging systems tend to suffer from a space variant (SV) blur and ill matrix condition and, thus, tend to amplify additive noise in the essential stage of image restoration. Previously, we showed that the matrix condition of systems with SV blur can be improved by adding a system-tailored parallel auxiliary system. We introduced such a solution with the “trajectories” method, where we used auxiliary optics with a pixel confined point spread function to decompose the required auxiliary system. In this paper, by removing the pixel confined requirement, we extend the trajectories to a “blurred trajectories” method, which relies on the more common case of auxiliary optics with blurred response. The method is simulated and shown to be effective in two cases. First, we show that the matrix condition is significantly improved. In one case the condition number of a space variant system is reduced from 87640 down to 1212. In a second case of a highly defocused system, the matrix condition number is reduced from 6412.5 to 238.7. We then investigate the influence of the improvement in the matrix condition on image restoration by regularization with and without the auxiliary system. Blurred trajectories with regularization yields better restoration than regularization only. The new (to our knowledge) system is compared to other previously suggested optical designs. The method’s flexibility is demonstrated when applied as postprocessing on a system that includes the original ill-conditioned system and a quartic phase filter and yields an improvement in the overall matrix condition.

© 2011 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(070.6110) Fourier optics and signal processing : Spatial filtering
(080.1010) Geometric optics : Aberrations (global)
(100.3190) Image processing : Inverse problems
(110.3010) Imaging systems : Image reconstruction techniques

ToC Category:
Fourier Optics and Signal Processing

History
Original Manuscript: March 16, 2011
Manuscript Accepted: May 23, 2011
Published: August 2, 2011

Citation
Iftach Klapp and David Mendlovic, "Trajectories by a blurred auxiliary system," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 28, 1796-1804 (2011)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-28-9-1796


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. A. W. Lohmann and W. T. Rhodes, “Two-pupil synthesis of optical transfer functions,” Appl. Opt. 17, 1141–1151 (1978). [CrossRef]
  2. E. R. Dowski and W. T. Cathey, “Extended depth of field through wave-front coding,” Appl. Opt. 34, 1859–1866 (1995). [CrossRef]
  3. W. Chi and N. George, “Electronic imaging using a logarithmic asphere,” Opt. Lett. 26, 875–877 (2001). [CrossRef]
  4. S. Mezouari and A. R. Harvey, “Phase pupil function for reduction of defocus and spherical aberration,” Opt. Lett. 28, 771–773(2003). [CrossRef]
  5. S. Mezouari, G. Moyo, and A. R. Harvey, “Circularly symmetric phase filters for control of primary third-order aberrations: coma and astigmatism,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 23, 1058–1062 (2006). [CrossRef]
  6. G. M. Robbins, “Inverse filtering for linear shift variant imaging system,” Proc. IEEE 60, 862–872 (1972). [CrossRef]
  7. H. Trussell and B. Hunt, “Image restoration of space-variant blurs by sectioned methods,” IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 26, 608–609 (1978). [CrossRef]
  8. H. Trussell and B. Hunt, “Image restoration of space variant blurs by sectioned methods,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP) ’78, Vol. 3 (IEEE, 1978), pp. 196–198.
  9. T. P. Costello and W. B. Mikhael, “Efficient restoration of space-variant blurs from physical optics by sectioning with modified Wiener filtering,” Digital Signal Process. 13, 1–22 (2003). [CrossRef]
  10. P. C. Hansen, J. G. Nagy, and D. P. O’Leary, Deblurring Images: Matrices, Spectra, and Filtering (SIAM, 2006), Chap. 1.4.
  11. I. Klapp and D. Mendlovic, “Improvement of matrix condition of hybrid, space variant optics by the means of parallel optics design,” Opt. Express 17, 11673–11689 (2009). [CrossRef]
  12. I. Klapp, Tel Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel, and D. Mendlovic, “Trajectories in parallel optics” (in preparation).
  13. M. Bertero and P. Boccacci, Introduction to Inverse Problems in Imaging (IOP, 1998), pp. 86, 252.
  14. I. Klapp and D. Mendlovic, “Parallel optics for improving system matrix condition,” in Computational Optical Sensing and Imaging, OSA Technical Digest (CD) (Optical Society of America, 2009), paper CWB3.
  15. S. G. Lipson and H. Lipson, Optical Physics, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University, 1981), p. 170.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited