This paper discusses the physical difference between two image formation approaches for partially coherent imaging. In one approach, the pupil function is shifted according to illumination condition as in the transmission cross coefficient (TCC) approach, whereas in the other approach, the object spectrum is shifted. Although the two approaches result in identical images, they are built on distinct physical models. Eigenfunction analysis reveals that the TCC approach is built on an artificial optical model only for image calculation. Therefore, the two approaches are not interchangeable except for image calculation. Such an example is found in calculating the entropy in an imaging system.
© 2012 Optical Society of America
Original Manuscript: August 13, 2012
Revised Manuscript: October 22, 2012
Manuscript Accepted: October 24, 2012
Published: November 21, 2012
Kenji Yamazoe, "Two models for partially coherent imaging," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 29, 2591-2597 (2012)