OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Editor: Franco Gori
  • Vol. 29, Iss. 2 — Feb. 1, 2012
  • pp: A258–A267

Do color appearance judgments interfere with detection of small threshold stimuli?

Darren E. Koenig and Heidi J. Hofer  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 29, Issue 2, pp. A258-A267 (2012)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.29.00A258


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1254 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The application of adaptive optics to vision science creates the potential to directly probe the link between the retinal mosaic and visual perception. However, interrogation on a cellular level requires small, threshold stimuli and therefore an implicit detection model. Unfortunately the parameters governing detection at cone threshold are poorly constrained, and whether or not appearance judgments interact with detectability under these conditions is unknown. We tested the assumption that subjects can report stimulus appearance without compromising sensitivity by having four subjects rate either detection certainty, color appearance, or both, for small, brief, monochromatic (580 nm) point stimuli presented to the dark adapted fovea. Reporting color, either alone or in conjunction with detection certainty, did not impair detection. Sensitivity actually increased in the simultaneous reporting task, while color reports were effectively unaltered. These results suggest that 1. color mechanisms contain information relevant for detection at cone threshold, 2. subjects cannot voluntarily make full use of this information in a simple detection task, and 3. simultaneous reporting is a viable method of investigating multiple stimulus attributes for small threshold stimuli.

© 2012 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.1720) Vision, color, and visual optics : Color vision
(330.1880) Vision, color, and visual optics : Detection
(330.5310) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision - photoreceptors
(330.5510) Vision, color, and visual optics : Psychophysics

ToC Category:
Color sensitivity and appearance

History
Original Manuscript: September 2, 2011
Revised Manuscript: November 20, 2011
Manuscript Accepted: November 22, 2011
Published: January 27, 2012

Virtual Issues
Vol. 7, Iss. 4 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Citation
Darren E. Koenig and Heidi J. Hofer, "Do color appearance judgments interfere with detection of small threshold stimuli?," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 29, A258-A267 (2012)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-29-2-A258


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. T. Young, “On the theory of light and colours,” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London 92, 12–48 (1802).
  2. A. Roorda and D. R. Williams, “The arrangement of the three cone classes in the living human eye,” Nature 397, 520–522 (1999). [CrossRef]
  3. H. J. Hofer, J. Carroll, J. Neitz, M. Neitz, and D. R. Williams, “Organization of the human trichromatic cone mosaic,” J. Neurosci. 25, 9669–9679 (2005). [CrossRef]
  4. D. R. Williams, “The invisible cone mosaic,” in Advances in Photoreception: Proceedings of a Symposium on Frontiers of Visual Science (National Academy Press, 1990), pp. 135–148.
  5. D. R. Williams, N. Sekiguchi, W. Haake, D. Brainard, and O. Packer, “The cost of trichromacy for spatial vision,” in From Pigments to Perception, A. Valberg and B. B. Lee, eds. (Plenum, 1991), pp. 11–22.
  6. H. J. Hofer, B. Singer, and D. R. Williams, “Different sensations from cones with the same photopigment,” J. Vision 5(5), 5, 444–454 (2005).
  7. D. H. Brainard, D. R. Williams, and H. J. Hofer, “Trichromatic reconstruction from the interleaved cone mosaic: Bayesian model and the color appearance of small spots,” J. Vision 8(5), 15, 1–23 (2008).
  8. J. Krauskopf, “On identifying detectors,” In Visual Psychophysics and Physiology, J. C. Armstrong and J. Krauskopf, eds. (Academic, 1978), pp. 283–295.
  9. S. Otake, P. D. Gowdy, and C. M. Cicerone, “The spatial arrangement of L and M cones in the peripheral human retina,” Vision Res. 40, 677–693 (2000).
  10. F. H. C. Marriott, “The foveal absolute visual threshold for short flashes and small fields,” J. Physiol. 169, 416–423 (1963).
  11. P. E. King-Smith and D. Carden, “Luminance and opponent-color contributions to visual detection and adaptation and to temporal and spatial integration,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66, 709–717(1976). [CrossRef]
  12. K. T. Mullen and J. J. Kulikowski, “Wavelength discrimination at detection threshold,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 733–742 (1990). [CrossRef]
  13. B. B. Lee, H. Sun, and A. Valberg, “Segregation of chromatic and luminance signals using a novel grating stimulus,” J. Physiol. 589, 59–73 (2011). [CrossRef]
  14. S. A. Klein, “Double-judgment psychophysics: problems and solutions,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 1560–1585 (1985). [CrossRef]
  15. M. C. Morrone, V. Denti, and D. Spinelli, “Different attentional resources modulate the gain mechanisms for color and luminance mechanisms,” Vision Res. 44, 1389–1401 (2004).
  16. J. Duncan and I. Nimmo-Smith, “Objects and attributes in divided attention: surface and boundary systems,” Percept. Psychophys. 58, 1076–1084 (1996).
  17. C. M. Cicerone and J. L. Nerger, “The relative numbers of long-wavelength-sensitive to middle-wavelength-sensitive cones in the human fovea,” Vision Res. 26, 115–128 (1989).
  18. J. D. Rattle, “Effect of target size on monocular fixation,” Opt. Acta 16, 183–190 (1969). [CrossRef]
  19. R. W. Ditchburn, Eye Movements and Visual Perception(Clarendon, 1973).
  20. D. E. Koenig and H. J. Hofer, “The absolute threshold of cone vision,” J. Vision 11(1), 21, 1–24 (2011).
  21. D. H. Brainard, “The psychophysics toolbox,” Spatial Vis. 10, 433–436 (1997).
  22. D. G. Pelli, “The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies,” Spatial Vis. 10, 437–442 (1997).
  23. D. McNicol, A Primer of Signal Detection Theory (Lawrence Erlbaum , 2005).
  24. G. A. Gescheider, Psychophysics: The Fundamentals(Lawrence Erlbaum , 1997).
  25. I. Abramov, J. Gordon, and H. Chan, “Color appearance: properties of the uniform appearance diagram derived from hue and saturation scaling,” Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 71, 632–643 (2009).
  26. J. Krauskopf and R. Srebro, “Spectral sensitivity of color mechanisms: Derivation form fluctuations of color appearance near threshold,” Science 150, 1477–1479 (1965). [CrossRef]
  27. M. A. Bouman and P. L. Walraven, “Some color naming experiments for red and green monochromatic lights,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 47, 834–839 (1957). [CrossRef]
  28. H. G. Sperling and R. S. Harwerth, “Red-green cone interactions in the increment-threshold spectral sensitivity of primates,” Science 172, 180–184 (1971). [CrossRef]
  29. H. Spitzer, R. Desimone, and J. Moran, “Increased attention enhances both behavioral and neuronal performance,” Science 240, 338–340 (1988). [CrossRef]
  30. J. Nachmias and A. Weber, “Discrimination of simple and complex gratings,” Vision Res. 15, 217–223 (1975).
  31. C. S. Furchner, J. P. Thomas, and F. W. Campbell, “Detection and discrimination of simple and complex patterns at low spatial frequencies,” Vision Res. 17, 827–836 (1977).
  32. D. Alais, C. Morrone, and D. Burr, “Separate attentional resources for vision and audition,” Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 1339–1345 (2006). [CrossRef]
  33. A. Chaparro, C. F. Stromeyer, R. E. Kronauer, and R. T. Eskew, “Separable red-green and luminance detectors for small flashes,” Vision Res. 34, 751–762 (1993).
  34. K. T. Mullen and M. A. Losada, “Evidence for separate pathways for color and luminance detection mechanisms,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 3136–3151 (1994). [CrossRef]
  35. K. T. Mullen and M. J. Sankeralli, “Evidence for the stochastic independence of the blue-yellow, red-green and luminance detection mechanisms revealed by subthreshold summation,” Vision Res. 39, 733–745 (1999).
  36. M. A. Finkelstein and D. C. Hood, “Opponent-color cells can influence detection of small, brief lights,” Vision Res. 22, 89–95 (1982).
  37. M. A. Finkelstein and D. C. Hood, “Detection and discrimination of small, brief lights: variable tuning of opponent channels,” Vision Res. 24, 175–181 (1984).
  38. S. K. Andersen, M. M. Müller, and S. A. Hillyard, “Color-selective attention need not be mediated by spatial attention,” J. Vision 9(6), 2, 7 (2009).
  39. G. Sperling, “The information available in brief visual presentations,” Psychol. Mon. 74, 1–29 (1960). [CrossRef]
  40. I. Phillips, “Attention and iconic memory,” in Attention: Philosophical and Psychological Essays, C. Mole, D. Smithies, and W. Wu, eds. (Oxford University, 2011), pp. 204–227.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited