OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Editor: Franco Gori
  • Vol. 29, Iss. 3 — Mar. 1, 2012
  • pp: 270–277

Monte Carlo simulation of the field back-scattered from rough surfaces

Yves Delacrétaz, Olivier Seydoux, Stéphane Chamot, Andreas Ettemeyer, and Christian Depeursinge  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 29, Issue 3, pp. 270-277 (2012)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.29.000270


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (2069 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

A novel approach for the simulation of the field back-scattered from a rough surface is presented. It takes into account polarization and multiple scattering events on the surface, as well as diffraction effects. The validity and usefulness of this simulation is demonstrated in the case of surface topology measurement.

© 2012 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(030.5770) Coherence and statistical optics : Roughness
(030.6140) Coherence and statistical optics : Speckle
(090.1995) Holography : Digital holography

ToC Category:
Coherence and Statistical Optics

History
Original Manuscript: July 29, 2011
Revised Manuscript: November 23, 2011
Manuscript Accepted: November 25, 2011
Published: February 14, 2012

Citation
Yves Delacrétaz, Olivier Seydoux, Stéphane Chamot, Andreas Ettemeyer, and Christian Depeursinge, "Monte Carlo simulation of the field back-scattered from rough surfaces," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 29, 270-277 (2012)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-29-3-270


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. Q. Fang and D. Boas, “Monte Carlo simulation of photon migration in 3D turbid media accelerated by graphics processing units,” Opt. Express 17, 20178–20190 (2009). [CrossRef]
  2. K. Coffey, K. Priestley, J. Mahan, and M. Sanchez, “Diffraction models of radiation entering an aperture for use in a Monte Carlo ray-trace environment,” Proc. SPIE 3429, 213–219 (1998). [CrossRef]
  3. E. R. Freniere, G. G. Gregory, and R. A. Hassler, “Edge diffraction in Monte Carlo ray tracing,” Proc. SPIE 3780, 151–157 (1999). [CrossRef]
  4. V. Serikov and S. Kawamoto, “Numerical experiments in Monte Carlo modeling of polarization, diffraction, and interference phenomena,” Proc. SPIE 4436, 80–88 (2001). [CrossRef]
  5. S. Prahl, D. Fischer, and D. Duncan, “Monte Carlo green’s function formalism for the propagation of partially coherent light,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 26, 1533–1543 (2009). [CrossRef]
  6. A. Vernes, J. Bohm, and G. Vorlaufer, “Ab initio optical properties of tribological/engineering surfaces,” Tribol. Lett. 39, 39–47 (2010). [CrossRef]
  7. F. D. Hastings, J. B. Schneider, and S. L. Broschat, “A Monte-Carlo FDTD technique for rough surface scattering,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 43, 1183–1191 (1995).
  8. G. Gordon, E. Heyman, and R. Mazar, “A phase-space Gaussian beam summation representation of rough surface scattering,” J Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 1911–1921 (2005).
  9. D. Didascalou, M. Dottling, N. Geng, and W. Wiesbeck, “An approach to include stochastic rough surface scattering into deterministic ray-optical wave propagation modeling,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 51, 1508–1515 (2003). [CrossRef]
  10. H. Kadono, T. Asakura, and N. Takai, “Roughness and correlation-length determination of rough-surface objects using the speckle contrast,” Appl. Phys. B 44, 167–173 (1987). [CrossRef]
  11. O. Vasseur, I. Bergond, and X. Orlik, “A Gaussian transition of an optical speckle field studied by the minimal spanning tree method,” J. Eur. Opt. Soc. 5 (2010). [CrossRef]
  12. A. Anand, V. Chhaniwal, P. Almoro, G. Pedrini, and W. Osten, “Shape and deformation measurements of 3D objects using volume speckle field and phase retrieval,” Opt. Lett. 34, 1522–1524 (2009). [CrossRef]
  13. E. Cuche, P. Marquet, and C. Depeursinge, “Simultaneous amplitude-contrast and quantitative phase-contrast microscopy by numerical reconstruction of Fresnel off-axis holograms,” Appl. Opt. 38, 6994–7001 (1999). [CrossRef]
  14. U. Kumar, B. Bhaduri, M. Kothiyal, and N. Mohan, “Two-wavelength micro-interferometry for 3-D surface profiling,” Opt. Lasers Eng. 47, 223–229 (2009). [CrossRef]
  15. J. Kuhn, T. Colomb, F. Montfort, F. Charrière, Y. Emery, E. Cuche, P. Marquet, and C. Depeursinge, “Real-time dual-wavelength digital holographic microscopy with a single hologram acquisition,” Opt. Express 15, 7231–7242 (2007). [CrossRef]
  16. A. Ettemeyer, “Combination of 3-D deformation and shape measurement by electronic speckle-pattern interferometry for quantitative strain-stress analysis,” Opt. Eng. 39, 212–215 (2000). [CrossRef]
  17. J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics (Roberts, 1988), pp. 50–53.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited