OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Editor: Franco Gori
  • Vol. 29, Iss. 6 — Jun. 1, 2012
  • pp: 1180–1187

Dynamic coding of temporal luminance variation

Árni Kristjánsson  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 29, Issue 6, pp. 1180-1187 (2012)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.29.001180


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (555 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The range of variation in environmental stimuli is much larger than the visual system can represent. It is therefore sensible for the system to adjust its responses to the momentary input statistics of the environment, such as when our pupils contract to limit the light entering the eye. Previous evidence indicates that the visual system increasingly centers responses on the mean of the visual input and scales responses to its variation during adaptation. To what degree does adaptation to a stimulus varying in luminance over time result in such adjustment of responses? The first two experiments were designed to test whether sensitivity to changes in the amplitude and the mean of a 9.6° central patch varying sinusoidally in luminance at 0.6 Hz would increase or decrease with adaptation. This was also tested for a dynamic peripheral stimulus (random patches rotating on the screen) to test to what extent the effects uncovered in the first two experiments reflect retinotopic mechanisms. Sensitivity to changes in mean and amplitude of the temporal luminance variation increased sharply the longer the adaptation to the variation, both for the large patch and the peripheral patches. Adaptation to luminance variation leads to increased sensitivity to temporal luminance variation for both central and peripheral presentation, the latter result ruling retinotopic mechanisms out as sole explanations for the adaptation effects.

© 2012 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.1880) Vision, color, and visual optics : Detection
(330.5020) Vision, color, and visual optics : Perception psychology
(330.5510) Vision, color, and visual optics : Psychophysics

ToC Category:
Vision, Color, and Visual Optics

History
Original Manuscript: December 13, 2011
Revised Manuscript: March 22, 2012
Manuscript Accepted: March 30, 2012
Published: June 1, 2012

Virtual Issues
Vol. 7, Iss. 8 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Citation
Árni Kristjánsson, "Dynamic coding of temporal luminance variation," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 29, 1180-1187 (2012)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-29-6-1180


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. U. Neisser, Cognitive Psychology (Apple-Century-Crofts, 1967).
  2. C. Koch and S. Ullman, “Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry,” Hum. Neurobiol. 4, 219–227 (1985).
  3. K. Nakayama, “The iconic bottleneck and the tenuous link between early visual processing and perception,” in Vision: Coding and Efficiency, C. Blakemore, ed. (Cambridge University, 1990), pp. 411–422.
  4. R. Desimone and J. Duncan, “Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention,” Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 193–222 (1995). [CrossRef]
  5. H. E. Egeth and S. Yantis, “Visual attention: control, representation, and time course,” Annu. Rev. Psychol. 48, 269–297 (1997). [CrossRef]
  6. H. E. Pashler, The Psychology of Attention (MIT, 1998).
  7. Á. Kristjánsson, “Rapid learning in attention shifts—a review,” Vis. Cogn. 13, 324–362 (2006). [CrossRef]
  8. G. Fechner, Elements of Psychophysics (Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1966).
  9. H. Barlow, “A theory about the functional role and synaptic mechanism of visual after-effects,” In Vision: Coding and Efficiency, C. Blakemore, ed. (Cambridge University, 1990), pp. 363–375.
  10. C. W. G. Clifford and K. Langley, “A model of temporal adaptation in fly motion vision,” Vis. Res. 36, 2595–2608 (1996). [CrossRef]
  11. P. J. Bex, S. Beddingham, and S. T. Hammett, “Apparent speed and speed sensitivity during adaptation to motion,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 16, 2817–2824 (1999). [CrossRef]
  12. Á. Kristjánsson, “Increased sensitivity to speed changes during adaptation to first-order, but not to second-order motion,” Vis. Res. 41, 1825–1832 (2001). [CrossRef]
  13. C. W. G. Clifford and P. Wenderoth, “Adaptation to temporal modulation can enhance differential speed sensitivity,” Vis. Res. 39, 4324–4331 (1999). [CrossRef]
  14. Á Kristjánsson, “The functional benefits of tilt adaptation,” Seeing Perceiving 24, 37–51 (2011). [CrossRef]
  15. D. Regan and K. I. Beverley, “Postadaptation orientation discrimination” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 147–155 (1985). [CrossRef]
  16. J. Chen, H. Yang, A. B. Wang, and F. Fang, “Perceptual consequences of face viewpoint adaptation: face viewpoint aftereffect, changes of differential sensitivity to face view, and their relationship,” J. Vision 10(3):12, 1–11 (2010). [CrossRef]
  17. M. J. Wainwright, “Visual adaptation as optimal information transmission,” Vis. Res. 39, 3960–3974 (1999). [CrossRef]
  18. M. A. Webster and J. D. Mollon, “Adaptation and the color statistics of natural images,” Vis. Res. 37, 3283–3298 (1997). [CrossRef]
  19. H. Helson, “Fundamental problems in color vision. I. The principle governing changes in hue, saturation and lightness of non-selective samples in chromatic illumination,” J. Exp. Psychol. 23, 439–476 (1938). [CrossRef]
  20. H. HelsonAdaptation-Level Theory: An Experimental and Systematic Approach to Behavior (Harper & Row, 1964).
  21. K. J. W. Craik, “The effect of adaptation on differential brightness discrimination,” J. Physiol. 92, 406–421 (1938).
  22. C. W. G. Clifford, P. Wenderoth, and B. Spehar, “A functional angle on some after-effects in cortical vision,” Proc. R. Soc. B 267, 1705–1710 (2000). [CrossRef]
  23. C. W. G. Clifford, “Functional ideas about adaptation applied to spatial and motion vision,” in Fitting the Mind to the World: Adaptation and After-effects in High-Level VisionC. W. G. Clifford and G. Rhodes., eds. (Oxford University, 2007), pp. 47–82.
  24. S. M. Anstis, “Visual adaptation to gradual changes of intensity,” Science 155, 710–712 (1967). [CrossRef]
  25. R. Comtois, Vision Shell PPC [Software Libraries], (R. Comtois, 2000).
  26. S. Schieting and L. Spillmann, “Flicker adaptation in the peripheral retina,” Vis. Res. 27, 277–284 (1987). [CrossRef]
  27. S. Anstis, “Adaptation to peripheral flicker,” Vis. Res. 36, 3479–3485 (1996). [CrossRef]
  28. F. Attneave, “Some informational aspects of visual perception,” Psychol. Rev. 61, 183–193 (1954). [CrossRef]
  29. T. N. Cornsweet, Visual Perception (Academic, 1970).
  30. D. D. Hoffman and W. Richards, “Parts of recognition,” Cognition 18, 65–96 (1984). [CrossRef]
  31. E. H. Land, “The retinex theory of colour vision,” Proc. R. Inst. G. B. 47, 23–58 (1974).
  32. Á. Kristjánsson and P. U. Tse, “Curvature discontinuities are cues for rapid shape analysis,” Percept. Psychophys. 63, 390–403 (2001). [CrossRef]
  33. Á. Kristjánsson, “Learning in shifts of transient attention improves recognition of parts of ambiguous figure-ground displays,” J. Vision 9(4):21, 1–11 (2009). [CrossRef]
  34. Á. Kristjánsson and G. Campana, “Where perception meets memory: a review of priming in visual search,” Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 72, 5–18 (2010). [CrossRef]
  35. J. Edelman, Á. Kristjánsson, and K. Nakayama, “The influence of object-relative visuomotor set on express saccades,” J. Vision 7(6):12, 1–13 (2007). [CrossRef]
  36. Á. Kristjansson, M. Mackeben, and K. Nakayama, “Rapid, object-based learning in the deployment of transient attention,” Perception 30, 1375–1387 (2001). [CrossRef]
  37. Á. Kristjánsson and K. Nakayama, “A primitive memory system for the deployment of transient attention,” Percept. Psychophys. 65, 711–724 (2003). [CrossRef]
  38. J. W. Brascamp, R. Blake, and Á Kristjánsson, “Deciding where to attend: priming of pop-out drives target selection,” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 37, 1700–1707 (2011). [CrossRef]
  39. Á Kristjánsson, “I know what you did on the last trial—a selective review of research on priming in visual search,” Front. Biosci. 13, 1171–1181 (2008). [CrossRef]
  40. Z. Kourtzi and N. Kanwisher, “The human lateral occipital complex represents perceived object shape,” Science 293, 1506–1509 (2001). [CrossRef]
  41. K. Grill-Spector, R. Henson, and A. Martin, “Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus specific effects,” Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 14–23 (2006). [CrossRef]
  42. J. J. Geng, E. Eger, C. Ruff, Á. Kristjánsson, P. Rothstein, and J. Driver, “On-line attentional selection from competing stimuli in opposite visual fields: effects on human visual cortex and control processes,” J. Neurophysiol. 96, 2601–2612(2006). [CrossRef]
  43. Á. Kristjánsson, P. Vuilleumier, S. Schwartz, E. Macaluso, and J. Driver, “Neural basis for priming of pop-out revealed with fMRI,” Cereb. Cortex 17, 1612–1624 (2007). [CrossRef]
  44. C. Rorden, Á. Kristjánsson, K. Pirog-Revill, and S. Saevarsson, “Neural correlates of inter-trial priming and role-reversal in visual search,” Front. Hum. Neurosci. 5, 1–8 (2011). [CrossRef]
  45. K. Arnold and S. Anstis, “Properties of the visual channels that underlie adaptation to gradual change of luminance,” Vis. Res. 33, 47–54 (1993). [CrossRef]
  46. S. Shady, D. I. A. MacLeod, and H. S. Fisher, “Adaptation from invisible flicker,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 5170–5173 (2004). [CrossRef]
  47. J. Krauskopf, “Discrimination and detection of changes in luminance,” Vis. Res. 20, 671–677 (1980). [CrossRef]
  48. J. Krauskopf, D. R. Williams, and D. W. Heeley, “Cardinal directions of color space,” Vis. Res. 22, 1123–1131 (1982). [CrossRef]
  49. C. Blakemore and F. W. Campbell, “On the existence of neurons in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of images,” J. Physiol. 203, 237–260 (1969).
  50. R. Shapley and C. Enroth-Cugell, “Visual adaptation and retinal gain controls,” Prog. Retin. Res. 3, 263–346 (1984). [CrossRef]
  51. R. Shapley and J. D. Victor, “How the contrast gain control modifies the frequency responses of cat retinal ganglion cells,” J. Physiol. 318, 161–179 (1981).
  52. A. B. Watson and J. A. Solomon, “A model of visual contrast gain control and pattern masking,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 2379–2391 (1997). [CrossRef]
  53. M. Carandini, D. J. Heeger, and J. A. Movshon, “Linearity and gain control in V1 simple cells,” in Vol. 13 of Cerebral Cortex, P. S. Ulinski, E. G. Jones, and A. Peters, eds. (Kluwer/Plenum, 1999).
  54. D. Chander and E. J. Chichilinsky, “Adaptation to temporal contrast in primate and salamander retina,” J. Neurosci. 21, 9904–9916 (2001).
  55. S. M. Smirnakis, M. J. Berry, D. K. Warland, W. Blalek, and M. Meister ”Adaptation of retinal processing to image contrast and spatial scale,” Nature 386, 69–73 (1997). [CrossRef]
  56. J. Nachmias, “The role of virtual standards in visual discrimination,” Vis. Res. 46, 2456–2464 (2006). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1. Fig. 2. Fig. 3.
 
Fig. 4.
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited