OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 3, Iss. 4 — Apr. 1, 1986
  • pp: 550–557

Goos–Hänchen effect around and off the critical angle

H. M. Lai, F. C. Cheng, and W. K. Tang  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 3, Issue 4, pp. 550-557 (1986)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.3.000550


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (933 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

A general expression for the Goos–Hänchen lateral shift of a Gaussian wave beam, applicable for incident angle θ equal to, near, or larger than the critical angle θc, is obtained. It yields finite and smooth results around θc and coincides with Artmann’s classical result otherwise. Another expression for the lateral shift of a different beam-field distribution is also obtained and shown to be quite similar to that of the Gaussian beam. Comparisons with an existing theoretical expression and with available experimental data (for θθc) are made. Discussion of a different expression for θ away from θc obtained through an energy method is also presented.

© 1986 Optical Society of America

History
Original Manuscript: August 16, 1985
Manuscript Accepted: December 15, 1985
Published: April 1, 1986

Citation
H. M. Lai, F. C. Cheng, and W. K. Tang, "Goos–Hänchen effect around and off the critical angle," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 3, 550-557 (1986)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-3-4-550


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. F. Goos, H. Hänchen, “Ein neuer und fundamentaler Versuch zur Totalreflexion,” Ann. Physik 1, 333–346 (1947); “Neumessung des Strahlversetzungseffektes bei Totalreflexion,” Ann. Physik 5, 251–252 (1949). [CrossRef]
  2. K. Artmann, “Berechnung der Seitenversetzung des totalreflektierten Strahles,” Ann. Physik 2, 87–102 (1948). [CrossRef]
  3. R. H. Renard, “Total reflection: a new evaluation of the Goos–Hänchen Shift,”J. Opt. Soc. Am. 54, 1190–1197 (1964). Strictly speaking, the analytic expression obtained in this paper applies only to incident angles close to the critical angle (see the discussion in Section 6). [CrossRef]
  4. J. L. Agudin, “Time delay of scattering processes,” Phys. Rev. 171, 1385–1387 (1968). [CrossRef]
  5. B. R. Horowitz, T. Tamir, “Lateral displacement of a light beam at a dielectric interface,”J. Opt. Soc. Am. 61, 586–594 (1971). [CrossRef]
  6. K. W. Chiu, J. J. Quinn, “On the Goos–Hänchen effect: a simple example of time delay scattering process,” Am. J. Phys. 40, 1847–1851 (1972). [CrossRef]
  7. M. McGuirk, C. K. Carniglia, “An angular spectrum representation approach to the Goos–Hänchen Shift,”J. Opt. Soc. Am. 67, 103–107 (1977). [CrossRef]
  8. See, for example, H. Kogelnik, H. P. Weber, “Rays, stored energy, and power flow in dielectric waveguides,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 64, 174–185 (1974). [CrossRef]
  9. W. Magnus, F. Oberhettinger, R. P. Soni, Formulas and Theorems for the Special Functions of Mathematical Physics (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1966), pp. 323–332.
  10. The width σ defined here is related to Horowitz’s and Tamir’s w by σ=w/2.
  11. J. J. Cowan, B. Aničin, “Longitudinal and transverse displacements of a bounded microwave beam at total internal reflection,”J. Opt. Soc. Am. 67, 1307–1314 (1977). [CrossRef]
  12. Similar measurement of the shifts for one incident angle was carried out earlier by V. Akylas, J. Kaur, T. M. Knasel, “Longitudinal shift of a microwave beam at total internal reflection,” Appl. Opt. 13, 742–743 (1974). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. J. S. Gradshteyn, I. M. Ryzhik, Tables of Integrals, Series, and Products (Academic, New York, 1965), p. 337, Eq. (3.4621).
  14. The indication made by Horowitz and Tamir that the shift is nearly constant for θ≃ θc is misleading.
  15. The reason for taking such a value is for convenience of comparison with Cowan’s and Aničin’s experimental data in Section 5.
  16. Note that our S(θ) is related to the Cowan–Aničin X(θ) by S(θ) = X(θ)cos θ.
  17. Cowan and Aničin essentially took kσ=43/2≐30. Judging from their experimental data, we feel that kσ= 43 reflects the real situation better.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4 Fig. 5
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited