Abstract

Spatial-frequency discrimination thresholds were measured in two cats by using a two-alternative forced-choice procedure. A range of standard spatial frequencies centered around the peak of the cat’s contrast-sensitivity function was sampled. For comparison, discrimination thresholds were also measured in two human observers at spatial frequencies centered around the peak of the human contrast-sensitivity function. For the humans, spatial-frequency discrimination thresholds averaged 4%, while for cats discrimination thresholds averaged 50%. The relatively poorer performance of the cats cannot be entirely explained on the basis of the larger sample spacing of the feline retinal mosaic. More accurate predictions can be obtained from a model that assumes that the cat bases its discrimination performance on the level of activity within that mechanism maximally activated by the standard spatial frequency.

© 1986 Optical Society of America

Smooth frequency discrimination functions for foveal, high-contrast, mid spatial frequencies

Melanie J. Mayer and Charlene B. Y. Kim
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 3(11) 1957-1969 (1986)

Masking of spatial-frequency discrimination

D. Regan
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2(7) 1153-1159 (1985)

Orientation and spatial-frequency discrimination for luminance and chromatic gratings

Michael A. Webster, Karen K. De Valois, and Eugene Switkes
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7(6) 1034-1049 (1990)

Locus of spatial-frequency discrimination

Christina A. Burbeck
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4(9) 1807-1813 (1987)

Peripheral spatial vision: limits imposed by optics, photoreceptors, and receptor pooling

Martin S. Banks, Allison B. Sekuler, and Stephen J. Anderson
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 8(11) 1775-1787 (1991)