OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Editor: Franco Gori
  • Vol. 30, Iss. 10 — Oct. 1, 2013
  • pp: 2048–2065

A phase mixing model for the frequency-doubling illusion

James Wielaard and R. Theodore Smith  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 30, Issue 10, pp. 2048-2065 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.30.002048


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (853 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We introduce a temporal phase mixing model for a description of the frequency-doubling illusion (FDI). The model is generic in the sense that it can be set to refer to retinal ganglion cells, lateral geniculate cells, as well as simple cells in the primary visual cortex (V1). Model parameters, however, strongly suggest that the FDI originates in the cortex. The model shows how noise in the response phases of cells in V1, or in further processing of these phases, easily produces observed behavior of FDI onset as a function of spatiotemporal frequencies. It also shows how this noise can accommodate physiologically plausible spatial delays in comparing neural signals over a distance. The model offers an explanation for the disappearance of the FDI at sufficiently high spatial frequencies via increasingly correlated coding of neighboring grating stripes. Further, when the FDI is equated to vanishing perceptual discrimination between asynchronous contrast-reversal gratings, the model proposes the possibility that the FDI shows a resonance behavior at sufficiently high spatial frequencies, by which it is alternately perceived and not perceived in sequential temporal frequency bands.

© 2013 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.4060) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision modeling
(330.5020) Vision, color, and visual optics : Perception psychology
(330.5370) Vision, color, and visual optics : Physiological optics
(330.5510) Vision, color, and visual optics : Psychophysics
(330.6100) Vision, color, and visual optics : Spatial discrimination
(330.6790) Vision, color, and visual optics : Temporal discrimination

ToC Category:
Vision, Color, and Visual Optics

History
Original Manuscript: March 4, 2013
Revised Manuscript: July 1, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: July 17, 2013
Published: September 23, 2013

Citation
James Wielaard and R. Theodore Smith, "A phase mixing model for the frequency-doubling illusion," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 30, 2048-2065 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-30-10-2048


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. D. Kelly, “Frequency doubling in visual responses,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 1628–1633 (1966). [CrossRef]
  2. W. Richards and T. Felton, “Spatial frequency doubling: retinal or central?” Vis. Res. 13, 2129–2137 (1973). [CrossRef]
  3. C. Tyler, “Observations on spatial-frequency doubling,” Perception 3, 81–86 (1974). [CrossRef]
  4. J. Kulikowski, “Apparent fineness of briefly presented gratings: balance between movement and pattern channels,” Vis. Res. 15, 673–680 (1975). [CrossRef]
  5. D. Kelly, “Nonlinear visual responses to flickering sinusoidal gratings,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 71, 1051–1055 (1981). [CrossRef]
  6. A. Parker, “Shifts in perceived periodicity induced by temporal modulation and their influence on the spatial frequency tuning of two aftereffects,” Vis. Res. 21, 1739–1747 (1981). [CrossRef]
  7. A. Parker, “The effects of temporal modulation on the perceived spatial structure of sine wave gratings,” Perception 12, 663–682 (1983). [CrossRef]
  8. T. Maddess and W. Severt, “Testing for glaucoma with the spatial frequency-doubling illusion,” Vis. Res. 39, 4258–4273 (1999). [CrossRef]
  9. K. Vallam, I. Pataridis, and A. Metha, “Frequency doubling illusion under scotopic illumination and in peripheral vision,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 48, 3413–3418 (2007). [CrossRef]
  10. Y. Rosli, S. Bedford, and T. Maddess, “Low spatial-frequency channels and the spatial frequency doubling illusion,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 50, 1956–1963 (2009). [CrossRef]
  11. T. Maddess and G. Henry, “Performance of nonlinear visual units in ocular hypertension and glaucoma,” Clin Vision Sci 7, 371–383 (1992).
  12. C. Johnson and S. Samuels, “Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 38, 413–425 (1997).
  13. L. Racette, F. Medeiros, L. Zangwill, D. Ng, R. Weinreb, and P. Sample, “Diagnostic accuracy of the matrix 24-2 and original n-30 frequency-doubling technology tests compared with standard automated perimetry,” Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 49, 954–960 (2008). [CrossRef]
  14. H. Sun, M. Dul, and W. Swanson, “Linearity can account for the similarity among conventional, frequency-doubling, and Gabor-based perimetric tests in the glaucomatous macula,” Optometry Vision Sci. 83, E455–E465 (2006). [CrossRef]
  15. C. Clement, I. Goldberg, P. Healey, and S. Graham, “Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma,” British J. Ophthalmol. 93, 582–588 (2009). [CrossRef]
  16. A. Anderson and C. Johnson, “Mechanisms isolated by frequency-doubling technology perimetry,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 43, 398–401 (2002).
  17. M. Aghdaee and P. Cavanagh, “Temporal limits of long-range phase discrimination across the visual field,” Vis. Res. 47, 2156–2163 (2007). [CrossRef]
  18. J. Wielaard and P. Sajda, “Extraclassical phenomena and short-range connectivity in V1,” Cereb. Cortex 16, 1531–1545 (2006). [CrossRef]
  19. T. Maddess, “Frequency-doubling technology and parasol cells,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 52, 3759 (2011). [CrossRef]
  20. W. Swanson, H. Sun, B. Lee, and D. Cao, “Author response: frequency-doubling technology and parasol cells,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 52, 3759–3760 (2011). [CrossRef]
  21. T. Maddess, J. Hemmi, and A. James, “Evidence for spatial aliasing effects in the Y-like cells of the magnocellular visual pathway,” Vis. Res. 38, 1843–1859 (1998). [CrossRef]
  22. A. White, H. Sun, W. Swanson, and B. Lee, “An examination of physiological mechanisms underlying the frequency-doubling illusion,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 43, 3590–3599 (2002).
  23. W. Swanson, H. Sun, B. Lee, and D. Cao, “Responses of primate retinal ganglion cells to perimetric stimuli,” Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 52, 764–771 (2011). [CrossRef]
  24. J. Movshon, I. Thompson, and D. Tolhurst, “Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat’s striate cortex,” J. Physiol. 283, 53–77 (1978).
  25. J. Movshon, I. Thompson, and D. Tolhurst, “Receptive field organization of complex cells in the cat’s striate cortex,” J. Physiol. 283, 79–99 (1978).
  26. R. De Valois, D. Albrecht, and L. Thorell, “Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex,” Vis. Res. 22, 545–559 (1982). [CrossRef]
  27. H. Spitzer and S. Hochstein, “Simple- and complex-cell response dependencies on stimulation parameters,” J. Neurophysiol. 53, 1244–1265 (1985).
  28. R. Reid, R. Soodak, and R. Shapley, “Directional selectivity and spatiotemporal structure of receptive fields of simple cells in cat striate cortex,” J. Neurophysiol. 66, 505–529 (1991).
  29. B. Skottun, R. De Valois, D. Grosof, J. Movshon, D. Albrecht, and A. Bonds, “Classification of simple and complex cells on the basis of response modulation,” Vis. Res. 31, 1078–1086 (1991).
  30. J. Wielaard, M. Shelley, D. McLaughlin, and R. Shapley, “How simple cells are made in a nonlinear network model of the visual cortex,” J. Neurosci. 21, 5203–5211 (2001).
  31. K. Vallam and A. Metha, “Spatial structure of the frequency doubling illusion,” Vis. Res. 47, 1732–1744 (2007). [CrossRef]
  32. K. Vallam and A. Metha, “The relationship between temporal phase discrimination ability and the frequency doubling illusion,” J. Vis. 7(14):17, 1–11 (2007). [CrossRef]
  33. M. Hawken, R. Shapley, and D. Grosof, “Temporal-frequency selectivity in monkey visual cortex,” Vis. Neurosci. 13, 477–492 (1996). [CrossRef]
  34. M. Schmolesky, Y. Wang, D. Hanes, K. Thomson, S. Leutgeb, J. Schall, and A. Leventhal, “Signal timing across the macaque visual system,” J. Neurophysiol. 79, 3272–3278 (1998).
  35. V. Lamme and P. Roelfsema, “The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing,” Trends Neurosci. 23, 571–579 (2000). [CrossRef]
  36. F. Mechler and J. Victor, “Comparison of thresholds for high-speed drifting Vernier and a matched temporal phase-discrimination task,” Vis. Res. 40, 1839–1855 (2000). [CrossRef]
  37. J. Victor and M. Conte, “Temporal phase discrimination depends critically on separation,” Vis. Res. 42, 2063–2071 (2002). [CrossRef]
  38. J. Rovamo and A. Raninen, “Critical flicker frequency and M-scaling of stimulus size and retinal illuminance,” Vis. Res. 24, 1127–1131 (1984). [CrossRef]
  39. T. Andrews, L. White, D. Binder, and D. Purves, “Temporal events in cyclopean vision,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 3689–3692 (1996). [CrossRef]
  40. W. Van de Grind, O. Grüsser, and H. Lunkenheimer, Handbook of Sensory Physiology, R. Jung, ed. (Springer, 1973), Vol. VII/3, pp. 431–573.
  41. G. Westheimer and S. McKee, “Perception of temporal order in adjacent visual stimuli,” Vis. Res. 17, 887–892 (1977). [CrossRef]
  42. S. He, P. Cavanagh, and J. Intriligator, “Attentional resolution,” Trends Cogn. Sci. 1, 115–121 (1997). [CrossRef]
  43. D. Rogers-Ramachandra and V. Ramachandran, “Psychophysical evidence for boundary and surface systems in human vision,” Vis. Res. 38, 71–77 (1998). [CrossRef]
  44. J. Forte, J. Hogben, and J. Ross, “Spatial limitations of temporal segmentation,” Vis. Res. 39, 4052–4061 (1999). [CrossRef]
  45. A. Holcombe, “Spatial limitations of temporal segmentation,” Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 216–221 (2009). [CrossRef]
  46. R. De Valois, M. Webster, K. De Valois, and B. Lingelbach, “Temporal properties of brightness and color induction,” Vis. Res. 26, 887–897 (1986). [CrossRef]
  47. I. Motoyoshi, “The role of spatial interactions in perceptual synchrony,” J. Vis. 4(5):1, 352–361 (2004). [CrossRef]
  48. P. Cavanagh, “Attention-based motion perception,” Science 257, 1563–1565 (1992). [CrossRef]
  49. Z. Lu and G. Sperling, “Three-systems theory of human visual motion perception: review and update,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 2331–2370 (2001). [CrossRef]
  50. F. Verstraten, P. Cavanagh, and A. Labianca, “Limits of attentive tracking reveal temporal properties of attention,” Vis. Res. 40, 3651–3664 (2000). [CrossRef]
  51. L. Battelli, P. Cavanagh, P. Martini, and J. Barton, “Bilateral deficits of transient visual attention in right parietal patients,” Brain 126, 2164–2174 (2003). [CrossRef]
  52. O. Grüsser and T. Landis, Visual Agnosias and Other Disturbances of Visual Perception and Cognition (Macmillan, 1991).
  53. M. Fahle, “Figure-ground discrimination from temporal information,” Proc. R. Soc. B 254, 199–203 (1993). [CrossRef]
  54. U. Leonards, W. Singer, and M. Fahle, “The influence of temporal phase differences on texture segmentation,” Vis. Res. 36, 2689–2697 (1996). [CrossRef]
  55. F. Kandil and M. Fahle, “Purely temporal figure-ground segregation,” Eur. J. Neurosci. 13, 2004–2008 (2001). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited