OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Editor: Franco Gori
  • Vol. 30, Iss. 11 — Nov. 1, 2013
  • pp: 2196–2204

Physical model of differential Mueller matrix for depolarizing uniform media

Vincent Devlaminck  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 30, Issue 11, pp. 2196-2204 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.30.002196


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (164 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

In this article, we address the question of significance of the parameters of differential Mueller matrix formalism. We show how the concept of mean value and uncertainty of the optical properties recently introduced to depict this differential matrix can be related to the random fluctuations of these optical properties. From the layered-medium interpretation introduced by Jones [J. Opt. Soc. Am. 38, 671 (1948)] and extended to Mueller–Jones matrix by Azzam [J. Opt. Soc. Am. 68, 1756 (1978)], a generalization to depolarizing Mueller matrices is proposed. Based on the random Mueller–Jones matrix approach, the obtained parameterization perfectly fits the previous results from the literature. Necessary conditions of positivity on specific coefficients imposed in order to have physical Mueller matrix are introduced in a natural way and not inferred a posteriori. Interpretations of the underlying physical processes are also presented. An illustrative experimental example is provided from literature data.

© 2013 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(230.5440) Optical devices : Polarization-selective devices
(260.2130) Physical optics : Ellipsometry and polarimetry
(260.5430) Physical optics : Polarization

ToC Category:
Physical Optics

History
Original Manuscript: April 26, 2013
Revised Manuscript: July 17, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: August 22, 2013
Published: October 4, 2013

Citation
Vincent Devlaminck, "Physical model of differential Mueller matrix for depolarizing uniform media," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 30, 2196-2204 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-30-11-2196


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. R. C. Jones, “A new calculus for the treatment of optical systems. VII. Properties of the N-matrices,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 38, 671–685 (1948). [CrossRef]
  2. R. M. A. Azzam, “Propagation of partially polarized light through anisotropic media with or without depolarization: a differential 4×4 matrix calculus,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 68, 1756–1767 (1978). [CrossRef]
  3. R. Barakat, “Exponential versions of the Jones and Mueller–Jones polarization matrices,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 158–163 (1996). [CrossRef]
  4. R. Ossikovski, “Differential matrix formalism for depolarizing anisotropic media,” Opt. Lett. 36, 2330–2332 (2011). [CrossRef]
  5. N. Ortega-Quijano and J. L. Arce-Diego, “Mueller matrix differential decomposition,” Opt. Lett. 36, 1942–1944 (2011). [CrossRef]
  6. N. Ortega-Quijano and J. L. Arce-Diego, “Depolarizing differential Mueller matrices,” Opt. Lett. 36, 2429–2431 (2011). [CrossRef]
  7. A. Chipman, Handbook of Optics, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, 2009), Vol. 1.
  8. H. D. Noble and R. A. Chipman, “Mueller matrix roots algorithm and computational considerations,” Opt. Express 20, 17–31 (2012). [CrossRef]
  9. R. Ossikovski, “Differential and product Mueller matrix decompositions: a formal comparison,” Opt. Lett. 37, 220–222 (2012). [CrossRef]
  10. T. Germer, “Realizable differential matrices for depolarizing media,” Opt. Lett. 37, 921–923 (2012). [CrossRef]
  11. B. N. Simon, S. Simon, N. Mukunda, F. Gori, M. Santarsiero, R. Borghi, and R. Simon, “A complete characterization of pre-Mueller and Mueller matrices in polarization optics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 27, 188–199 (2010). [CrossRef]
  12. V. Devlaminck, P. Terrier, and J. M. Charbois, “Differential matrix physically admissible for depolarizing media: the case of diagonal matrices,” Opt. Lett. 38, 1497–1499 (2013). [CrossRef]
  13. V. Devlaminck, P. Terrier, and J. M. Charbois, “A physically admissible parameterization for differential Mueller matrix of uniform media,” Opt. Lett. 38, 1410–1412 (2013). [CrossRef]
  14. N. Ortega-Quijano, B. Haj-Ibrahim, E. García-Caurel, J. Arce-Diego, and R. Ossikovski, “Experimental validation of Mueller matrix differential decomposition,” Opt. Express 20, 1151–1163 (2012). [CrossRef]
  15. N. Ghosh, M. F. G. Wood, S. Li, R. D. Weisel, B. C. Wilson, R. Li, and I. A. Vitkin, “Mueller matrix decomposition for polarized light assessment of biological tissues,” J. Biophotonics 2, 145–156 (2009). [CrossRef]
  16. S. Y. Lu and R. A. Chipman, “Interpretation of Mueller matrices based on polar decomposition,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 1106–1113 (1996). [CrossRef]
  17. S. Manhas, M. K. Swami, P. Buddhiwant, N. Ghosh, P. K. Gupta, and K. Singh, “Mueller matrix approach for determination of optical rotation in chiral turbid media in backscattering geometry,” Opt. Express 14, 190–202 (2006). [CrossRef]
  18. S. Kumar, H. Purwar, R. Ossikovski, I. A. Vitkin, and N. Ghosh, “Comparative study of differential matrix and extended polar decomposition formalisms for polarimetric characterization of complex tissue-like turbid media,” J. Biomed. Opt. 17, 105006 (2012). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited