OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Editor: Franco Gori
  • Vol. 31, Iss. 4 — Apr. 1, 2014
  • pp: A263–A267

Testing the performance of CIECAM02 model using two distinct glossinesses of color printing atlas

Shuwen Dong, Ningfang Liao, Li Song, Jing Liang, and Kai Lin  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 31, Issue 4, pp. A263-A267 (2014)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.31.00A263


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (659 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Psychophysical experiments have been carried out in which the color appearance of high-gloss and low-gloss color printing atlases was assessed using a magnitude estimation method under three different light sources. A linearity fitting algorithm by the method of least squares was applied to evaluate the correlation between visual experiment data and predicted results through the CIECAM02 model of different glossinesses of color printing atlases. The research result has shown that there was a good correlation between mean visual results and predicted results for hue and lightness of two distinct glossinesses of the color printing atlas. The correlations of hue and lightness between visual experiment data and predicted results were the best and the second best, respectively, under the same light source. Colorfulness was the worst. Meanwhile, high-gloss and low-gloss color printing atlases have been estimated and compared in the viewing conditions of 0°/45°. The result has indicated that the hue of the color printing atlas could not be affected by gloss levels under three light sources. Colorfulness of the color printing atlas almost could not be affected by gloss levels under D65 and TL84 light sources. Lightness of the color printing atlas could be affected by gloss levels under a TL84 light source.

© 2014 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.0330) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision, color, and visual optics
(330.4060) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision modeling

ToC Category:
Color sensitivity and appearance

History
Original Manuscript: October 3, 2013
Revised Manuscript: December 25, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: January 12, 2014
Published: February 14, 2014

Virtual Issues
Vol. 9, Iss. 6 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Citation
Shuwen Dong, Ningfang Liao, Li Song, Jing Liang, and Kai Lin, "Testing the performance of CIECAM02 model using two distinct glossinesses of color printing atlas," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 31, A263-A267 (2014)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-31-4-A263


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. M. Lourdes, G. Martin, and W. Ji, “Measuring colour appearance of red wines,” Food Quality and Preference 6, 862–871 (2007).
  2. L. Fu, H. Xu, and M. R. Luo, “Estimating color appearance of pearlescent bottles using digital camera,” Chin. Opt. Lett. 8, 744–747 (2009).
  3. J. Ma, H. Xu, and M. R. Luo, “Color appearance and visual measurements for color samples with gloss effect,” Chin. Opt. Lett. 9, 869–872 (2009).
  4. Z. Huang, H. Xu, and M. R. Luo, “Assessing total differences for effective samples having variations in color, coarseness, and glint,” Chin. Opt. Lett. 8, 717–720 (2010). [CrossRef]
  5. L. Jing, L. Ningfang, and S. Li, “Establishment and evaluation of color appearance datasets about low-gloss color printing atlas,” Acta Opt. Sin. 32, 0533001 (2012). [CrossRef]
  6. S. Liu and B. Zhou, “The research of a printed color code based on computer display,” Inst. Survey. Map. 3, 197–200 (2000).
  7. N. F. Liao, J. H. Shi, and W. M. Wu, The Conspectus of Color Information Management for Digital Images (Beijing Institute of Technology, 2009).
  8. W. Hu, S. Tang, and Z. Zhu, Modern Color Science and Application (Beijing Institute of Technology, 2007).
  9. Z. Wang and H. Xu, “Lightness threshold evaluation in visual color matching,” Acta Opt. Sin. 8, 1274–1278 (2006).
  10. P. A. Garcia, R. Huertas, and M. Melgosa, “Measurement of the relationship between perceived and computed color differences,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24, 1823–1829 (2007). [CrossRef]
  11. M. R. Luo, A. A. Clarke, and P. A. Rhodes, “Quantifying colour appearance. part I. LUTCHI colour appearance data,” Color Res. Appl. 16, 166–180 (1991). [CrossRef]
  12. P. A. García, R. Huertas, M. Melgosa, and G. Cui, “Measurement of the relationship between perceived and computed color differences,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24, 1823–1829 (2007). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited