OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Editor: Franco Gori
  • Vol. 31, Iss. 4 — Apr. 1, 2014
  • pp: A27–A33

Use of spectroscopy for assessment of color discrimination in animal vision

Derya Akkaynak  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 31, Issue 4, pp. A27-A33 (2014)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.31.000A27


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (645 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Animals use color vision for a number of tasks including food localization, object recognition, communication, and mate selection. For these and other specific behaviors involving the use of color cues, models that quantify color discriminability have been developed. These models take as input the photoreceptor spectral sensitivities of the animal and radiance spectra of the surfaces of interest. These spectra are usually acquired using spectroscopic instruments that collect point-by-point data and can easily yield signals contaminated with neighboring colors if not operated carefully. In this paper, I present an equation that relates the optical fiber diameter and numerical aperture to the measurement angle and distance needed to record uncontaminated spectra. I demonstrate its utility by testing the discriminability of two solid colors for the visual systems of a dichromatic ferret and a trichromatic frog in (1) a conspicuous scenario where the colors have little spectral overlap and (2) a perfect camouflage scenario where the spectra are identical. This equation is derived from geometrical optics and is applicable to spectroscopic measurements in all fields.

© 2013 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(300.0300) Spectroscopy : Spectroscopy
(300.6550) Spectroscopy : Spectroscopy, visible
(330.0330) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision, color, and visual optics
(330.1710) Vision, color, and visual optics : Color, measurement
(330.1720) Vision, color, and visual optics : Color vision

ToC Category:
Chromatic discrimination

History
Original Manuscript: October 3, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: November 1, 2013
Published: December 19, 2013

Citation
Derya Akkaynak, "Use of spectroscopy for assessment of color discrimination in animal vision," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 31, A27-A33 (2014)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-31-4-A27


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. D. Brainard, “Color vision theory,” in International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, N. Smelser and P. Baltes, eds. (Elsevier, 2001), pp. 2256–2263.
  2. M. E. Maan and M. E. Cummings, “Female preferences for aposematic signal components in a polymorphic poison frog,” Evolution 62, 2334–2345 (2008). [CrossRef]
  3. A. Kelber, M. Vorobyev, and D. Osorio, “Animal colour vision, behavioural tests and physiological concepts,” Biol. Rev. 78, 81–118 (2003). [CrossRef]
  4. M. C. Stoddard and M. Stevens, “Avian vision and the evolution of egg color mimicry in the common cuckoo,” Evolution 65, 2004–2013 (2011). [CrossRef]
  5. J. A. Endler and P. W. Mielke, “Comparing entire colour patterns as birds see them,” Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 86, 405–431 (2005). [CrossRef]
  6. G. Wyszecki and W. S. Stiles, Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data, and Formulae, 2nd ed. (Wiley, 2000).
  7. D. Akkaynak, T. Treibitz, B. Xiao, U. A. Gurkan, J. J. Allen, U. Demirci, and R. T. Hanlon, “Use of commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) digital cameras for scientific data acquisition and scene-specific color calibration,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A (to be published).
  8. D. Akkaynak, J. Allen, L. Mäthger, C.-C. Chiao, and R. Hanlon, “Quantification of cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) camouflage: a study of color and luminance using in situ spectrometry,” J. Comp. Physiol. A 199, 211–225 (2013). [CrossRef]
  9. R. T. Hanlon, C.-C. Chiao, L. M. Mäthger, and N. J. Marshall, “A fish-eye view of cuttlefish camouflage using in situ spectrometry,” Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 109, 535–551 (2013). [CrossRef]
  10. C. C. Chiao, J. K. Wickiser, J. J. Allen, B. Genter, and R. T. Hanlon, “Hyperspectral imaging of cuttlefish camouflage indicates good color match in the eyes of fish predators,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 9148–9153 (2011). [CrossRef]
  11. L. A. Isaac and P. T. Gregory, “Can snakes hide in plain view? Chromatic and achromatic crypsis of two colour forms of the Western terrestrial garter snake (Thamnophis elegans),” Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 108, 756–772 (2013).
  12. S. D. Finkbeiner, A. D. Briscoe, and R. D. Reed, “The benefit of being a social butterfly: communal roosting deters predation,” Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 2769–2776 (2012). [CrossRef]
  13. O. Lind, M. Mitkus, P. Olsson, and A. Kelber, “Ultraviolet sensitivity and colour vision in raptor foraging,” J. Exp. Biol. 216, 1819–1826 (2013). [CrossRef]
  14. M. E. Maan and M. E. Cummings, “Poison frog colors are honest signals of toxicity, particularly for bird predators,” Am. Nat. 179, E1–E14 (2012). [CrossRef]
  15. S. M. Bybee, F. Yuan, M. D. Ramstetter, J. Llorente-Bousquets, R. D. Reed, D. Osorio, and A. D. Briscoe, “UV photoreceptors and UV-yellow wing pigments in Heliconius butterflies allow a color signal to serve both mimicry and intraspecific communication,” Am. Nat. 179, 38–51 (2012). [CrossRef]
  16. F. Cortesi and K. Cheney, “Conspicuousness is correlated with toxicity in marine opisthobranchs,” J. Evol. Biol. 23, 1509–1518 (2010). [CrossRef]
  17. N. Langmore, M. Stevens, G. Maurer, and R. Kilner, “Are dark cuckoo eggs cryptic in host nests?” Anim. Behav. 78, 461–468 (2009). [CrossRef]
  18. J. Baldwin and S. n. Johnsen, “The male blue crab, Callinectes sapidus, uses both chromatic and achromatic cues during mate choice,” J. Exp. Biol. 215, 1184–1191 (2012). [CrossRef]
  19. O. Nokelainen, R. H. Hegna, J. H. Reudler, C. Lindstedt, and J. Mappes, “Trade-off between warning signal efficacy and mating success in the wood tiger moth,” Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 257–265 (2012). [CrossRef]
  20. A. Siddiqi, T. W. Cronin, E. R. Loew, M. Vorobyev, and K. Summers, “Interspecific and intraspecific views of color signals in the strawberry poison frog Dendrobates pumilio,” J. Exp. Biol. 207, 2471–2485 (2004). [CrossRef]
  21. M. Bass, C. DeCusatis, J. Enoch, V. Lakshminarayanan, G. Li, C. Macdonald, V. Mahajan, and E. Van Stryland, Handbook of Optics, Volume II: Design, Fabrication and Testing, Sources and Detectors, Radiometry and Photometry (McGraw-Hill, 2009).
  22. M. D. Fairchild and G. M. Johnson, “METACOW: a public-domain, high-resolution, fully-digital, noise-free, metameric, extended-dynamic-range, spectral test target for imaging system analysis and simulation,” in Color and Imaging Conference (Society for Imaging Science and Technology, 2004), pp. 239–245.
  23. R. H. Yuhas, A. F. H. Goetz, and J. W. Boardman, “Discrimination among semiarid landscape endmembers using the spectral angle mapper (SAM) algorithm,” in Summaries of the Third Annual JPL Airborne Geoscience Workshop, Pasadena, California (1992), Vol. l, pp 147–149.
  24. M. Vorobyev and D. Osorio, “Receptor noise as a determinant of colour thresholds,” Proc. R. Soc. B 265, 351–358 (1998). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited