OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Editor: Franco Gori
  • Vol. 31, Iss. 9 — Sep. 1, 2014
  • pp: 1993–2001

Truncation of the flash-lag effect by a fixed spatial landmark

Jacob D. Paschall and Mark E. Mazurek  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 31, Issue 9, pp. 1993-2001 (2014)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.31.001993


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (420 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The flash-lag effect is a visual illusion where a moving image is perceived to be advanced in its spatial location relative to a flashed image. Multiple studies have shown that the flash-lag effect can be enhanced by increasing the uncertainty of the moving and/or flashed images. However, little is known about the effect of task-irrelevant visual objects on the flash-lag effect. We were interested to see whether a task-irrelevant spatial landmark might reduce uncertainty and hence reduce the flash-lag effect. We placed a fixed bar between moving and flashed bars while measuring the flash-lag effect in six participants. For most participants, the fixed bar substantially truncated the flash-lag effect. The effect was maximal when the fixed bar was aligned with the flashed bar and decreased when the fixed bar was positioned more peripherally. A second experiment with two participants used a smaller fixed bar; the smaller bar had less truncation effect in one participant, while the other participant showed similar truncation regardless of the fixed bar size. Our results support models that place the locus of the flash-lag effect in higher-order brain areas, e.g., the parietal lobe.

© 2014 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.5510) Vision, color, and visual optics : Psychophysics
(330.7310) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision

ToC Category:
Vision, Color, and Visual Optics

History
Original Manuscript: June 3, 2014
Revised Manuscript: July 18, 2014
Manuscript Accepted: July 21, 2014
Published: August 14, 2014

Citation
Jacob D. Paschall and Mark E. Mazurek, "Truncation of the flash-lag effect by a fixed spatial landmark," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 31, 1993-2001 (2014)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-31-9-1993


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. D. M. MacKay, “Perceptual stability of a stroboscopically lit visual field containing self-luminous objects,” Nature 181, 507–508 (1958). [CrossRef]
  2. R. Nijhawan, “Motion extrapolation in catching,” Nature 370, 256–257 (1994). [CrossRef]
  3. R. Nijhawan, “Visual prediction: psychophysics and neurophysiology of compensation for time delays,” Behav. Brain Sci. 31, 179–198; discussion 198–239 (2008).
  4. T. L. Hubbard, “The flash-lag effect and related mislocalizations: findings, properties, and theories,” Psychol. Bull. 140, 308–338 (2014). [CrossRef]
  5. D. Whitney and I. Murakami, “Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation,” Nat. Neurosci. 1, 656–657 (1998). [CrossRef]
  6. D. Whitney, I. Murakami, and P. Cavanagh, “Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli,” Vis. Res. 40, 137–149 (2000). [CrossRef]
  7. R. Kanai, B. R. Sheth, and S. Shimojo, “Stopping the motion and sleuthing the flash-lag effect: spatial uncertainty is the key to perceptual mislocalization,” Vis. Res. 44, 2605–2619 (2004). [CrossRef]
  8. M. V. Baldo and S. A. Klein, “Extrapolation or attention shift?” Nature 378, 565–566 (1995). [CrossRef]
  9. M. V. C. Baldo, A. H. Kihara, J. Namba, and S. A. Klein, “Evidence for an attentional component of the perceptual misalignment between moving and flashing stimuli,” Perception 31, 17–30 (2002). [CrossRef]
  10. M. V. C. Baldo and J. Namba, “The attentional modulation of the flash-lag effect,” Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 35, 969–972 (2002). [CrossRef]
  11. D. Vreven and P. Verghese, “Predictability and the dynamics of position processing in the flash-lag effect,” Perception 34, 31–44 (2005). [CrossRef]
  12. Y. X. Fu, Y. Shen, and Y. Dan, “Motion-induced perceptual extrapolation of blurred visual targets,” J. Neurosci. 21, RC172 (2001).
  13. G. W. Maus and R. Nijhawan, “Forward displacements of fading objects in motion: the role of transient signals in perceiving position,” Vis. Res. 46, 4375–4381 (2006). [CrossRef]
  14. G. W. Maus and R. Nijhawan, “Going, going, gone: localizing abrupt offsets of moving objects,” J. Exp. Psychol. A 35, 611–626 (2009). [CrossRef]
  15. E. Brenner, R. J. van Beers, G. Rotman, and J. B. Smeets, “Motion extrapolation is not responsible for the flash-lag effect,” Vis. Res. 40, 1645–1648 (2000). [CrossRef]
  16. G. Rotman, E. Brenner, and J. B. J. Smeets, “Spatial but not temporal cueing influences the mislocalisation of a target flashed during smooth pursuit,” Perception 31, 1195–1203 (2002). [CrossRef]
  17. J. Namba and M. V. C. Baldo, “The modulation of the flash-lag effect by voluntary attention,” Perception 33, 621–631 (2004). [CrossRef]
  18. D. Sarich, M. Chappell, and C. Burgess, “Dividing attention in the flash-lag illusion,” Vis. Res. 47, 544–547 (2007). [CrossRef]
  19. A. Gauch and D. Kerzel, “Contributions of visible persistence and perceptual set to the flash-lag effect: focusing on flash onset abolishes the illusion,” Vis. Res. 49, 2983–2991 (2009). [CrossRef]
  20. S. Shiori, K. Yamamoto, H. Oshida, and K. Matsubara, “Measuring attention using flash-lag effect,” J. Vis. 10(10):10, 1–13 (2010). [CrossRef]
  21. B. Khurana, K. Watanabe, and R. Nijhawan, “The role of attention in motion extrapolation: are moving objects “corrected” or flashed objects attentionally delayed?” Perception 29, 675–692 (2000). [CrossRef]
  22. J. I. Gold and M. N. Shadlen, “The neural basis of decision making,” Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 30, 535–574 (2007). [CrossRef]
  23. T. D. Hanks, M. E. Mazurek, R. Kiani, E. Hopp, and M. N. Shadlen, “Elapsed decision time affects the weighting of prior probability in a perceptual decision task,” J. Neurosci. 31, 6339–6352 (2011). [CrossRef]
  24. S. Mateef and J. Hohnsbein, “Perceptual latencies are shorter for motion towards the fovea than away,” Vis. Res. 28, 711–719 (1988). [CrossRef]
  25. E. Brenner, R. J. van Beers, G. Rotman, and J. B. J. Smeets, “The role of uncertainty in the systematic spatial mislocalization of moving objects,” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 32, 811–825 (2006). [CrossRef]
  26. Z. Shi and R. Nijhawan, “Behavioral significance of motion direction causes anisotropic flash-lag, flash-drag, flash-repulsion, and movement-mislocalization effects,” J. Vis. 8(7):24, 1–14 (2008). [CrossRef]
  27. A. Maiche, R. Budelli, and L. Gómez-Sena, “Spatial facilitation is involved in flash-lag effect,” Vis. Res. 47, 1655–1661 (2007). [CrossRef]
  28. T. L. Hubbard and S. E. Ruppel, “Representational momentum and the landmark attraction effect,” Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 53, 242–256 (1999). [CrossRef]
  29. T. L. Hubbard, A. M. Kumar, and C. L. Carp, “Effects of spatial cueing on representational momentum,” J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 35, 666–677 (2009). [CrossRef]
  30. D. H. Brainard, “The psychophysics toolbox,” Spat. Vis. 10, 433–436 (1997). [CrossRef]
  31. D. G. Pelli, “The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies,” Spat. Vis. 10, 437–442 (1997). [CrossRef]
  32. W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vetterling, Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University, 1992).
  33. B. Krekelberg and M. Lappe, “Neuronal latencies and the position of moving objects,” Trends Neurosci. 24, 335–339 (2001). [CrossRef]
  34. G. W. Maus, J. Ward, R. Nijhawan, and D. Whitney, “The perceived position of moving objects: transcranial magnetic stimulation of area MT+ reduces the flash-lag effect,” Cereb. Cortex 23, 241–247 (2013). [CrossRef]
  35. C. Gilbert, “Laminar differences in receptive field properties of cells in cat primary visual cortex,” J. Physiol. 268, 391–421 (1977).
  36. J. Movshon, I. Thompson, and J. Tolhurst, “Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat’s striate cortex,” J. Physiol. 283, 53–77 (1978).
  37. A. Das and C. D. Gilbert, “Topography of contextual modulations mediated by short-range interactions in primary visual cortex,” Nature 399, 655–661 (1999). [CrossRef]
  38. J. R. Cavanaugh, W. Bair, and J. A. Movshon, “Nature and interaction of signals from the receptive field center and surround in macaque V1 neurons,” J. Neurophysiol. 88, 2530–2546 (2002). [CrossRef]
  39. D. Fitzpatrick, “Seeing beyond the receptive field in primary visual cortex,” Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 10, 438–443 (2000). [CrossRef]
  40. P. C. Knox, “The reduction of the effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion saccade amplitude by classic adaptation,” Perception 1, 95–102 (2010). [CrossRef]
  41. T. L. Hubbard and M. A. Motes, “An effect of context on whether memory for initial position exhibits a Fröhlich effect or an onset repulsion effect,” Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 58, 961–979 (2005). [CrossRef]
  42. T. L. Hubbard, “Do the flash-lag effect and representational momentum involve similar extrapolations?” Front. Psychol. 4, 290 (2013). [CrossRef]
  43. M. J. Berry, I. H. Brivanlou, T. A. Jordan, and M. Meister, “Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina,” Nature 398, 334–338 (1999). [CrossRef]
  44. D. J. Heeger, G. M. Boynton, J. B. Demb, E. Seidemann, and W. T. Newsome, “Motion opponency in visual cortex,” J. Neurosci. 19, 7162–7174 (1999).
  45. H. Jones, K. Grieve, W. Wang, and A. Sillito, “Surround suppression in primate V1,” J. Neurophysiol. 86, 2011–2028 (2001).
  46. A. Mikami, W. Newsome, and R. Wurtz, “Motion selectivity in macaque visual cortex. I. Mechanisms of direction and speed selectivity in extrastriate area MT,” J. Neurophysiol. 55, 1308–1327 (1986).
  47. H. Rodman and T. Albright, “Coding of visual stimulus velocity in area MT of the macaque,” Vis. Res. 27, 2035–2048 (1987). [CrossRef]
  48. R. Snowden and S. Treue, “The response of area MT and V1 neurons to transparent motion,” J. Neurosci. 11, 2768–2785 (1991).
  49. N. Qian and R. Andersen, “Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. II. Physiology,” J. Neurosci. 14, 7367–7380 (1994).
  50. E. Simoncelli and D. Heeger, “A model of neuronal responses in visual area MT,” Vis. Res. 38, 743–761 (1998). [CrossRef]
  51. B. A. Dosher and Z.-L. Lu, “Mechanisms of perceptual learning,” Vis. Res. 39, 3197–3221 (1999). [CrossRef]
  52. C. Gilbert, M. Sigman, and R. Crist, “The neural basis of perceptual learning,” Neuron 31, 681–697 (2001). [CrossRef]
  53. M. Ahissar and S. Hochstein, “The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning,” Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 457–464 (2004). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited