OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Editor: Franco Gori
  • Vol. 31, Iss. 9 — Sep. 1, 2014
  • pp: 2055–2063

Bidirectional reflectance distribution function based surface modeling of non-Lambertian using intensity data of light detection and ranging

Xiaolu Li, Yu Liang, and Lijun Xu  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 31, Issue 9, pp. 2055-2063 (2014)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (568 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



To provide a credible model for light detection and ranging (LiDAR) target classification, the focus of this study is on the relationship between intensity data of LiDAR and the bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF). An integration method based on the built-in-lab coaxial laser detection system was advanced. A kind of intermediary BRDF model advanced by Schlick was introduced into the integration method, considering diffuse and specular backscattering characteristics of the surface. A group of measurement campaigns were carried out to investigate the influence of the incident angle and detection range on the measured intensity data. Two extracted parameters r and Sλ are influenced by different surface features, which illustrate the surface features of the distribution and magnitude of reflected energy, respectively. The combination of two parameters can be used to describe the surface characteristics for target classification in a more plausible way.

© 2014 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(290.5880) Scattering : Scattering, rough surfaces
(290.1483) Scattering : BSDF, BRDF, and BTDF

ToC Category:

Original Manuscript: June 5, 2014
Revised Manuscript: July 30, 2014
Manuscript Accepted: August 2, 2014
Published: August 26, 2014

Xiaolu Li, Yu Liang, and Lijun Xu, "Bidirectional reflectance distribution function based surface modeling of non-Lambertian using intensity data of light detection and ranging," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 31, 2055-2063 (2014)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. X. Y. Liu, “Airborne LiDAR for DEM generation: some critical issues,” Prog. Phys. Geogr. 32, 31–49 (2008).
  2. A. Shaker and N. El-Ashmawy, “Land cover information extraction using lidar data,” in International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences (ISPRS) (ISPRS, 2012), Vol. XXXIX, pp. 167–172.
  3. B. Jutzi and H. Gross, “Normalization of LiDAR intensity data based on range and surface incidence angle,” in Proceedings of ISPRS, Laserscanning Workshop (ISPRS, 2009), pp. 213–218.
  4. Y. F. Wang, J. Z. Zhang, A. Roncat, C. Kunzer, and W. Wagner, “Regularizing method for the determination of the backscatter cross section in lidar data,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 26, 1071–1079 (2009). [CrossRef]
  5. B. Höfle and N. Pfeifer, “Correction of laser scanning intensity data: data and model-driven approaches,” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 62, 415–433 (2007). [CrossRef]
  6. A. Vain and S. Kaasalainen, “Correcting airborne laser scanning intensity data,” in Laser Scanning, Theory and Applications, C. C. Wang, ed. (InTech, 2011), pp. 49–60.
  7. W. Wagner, “Radiometric calibration of small-footprint full-waveform airborne laser scanner measurements: basic physical concepts,” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 65, 505–513 (2010). [CrossRef]
  8. W. Lucht, C. B. Schaaf, and A. H. Strahler, “An algorithm for the retrieval of albedo from space using semiempirical BRDF models,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 38, 977–998 (2000). [CrossRef]
  9. Z. M. Tong and X. Y. Chen, “Speckle contrast for superposed speckle patterns created by rotating the orientation of laser polarization,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 29, 2074–2079 (2012). [CrossRef]
  10. R. Montes and C. Ureña, “An overview of BRDF models,” .
  11. B. T. Phong, “Illumination for computer generated pictures,” Commun. ACM 18, 311–317 (1975). [CrossRef]
  12. J. F. Blinn, “Models of light reflection for computer synthesized pictures,” in SIGGRAPH’77: Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (ACM, 1997), pp. 192–198.
  13. K. E. Torrance and E. M. Sparrow, “Theory for off-specular reflection from roughened surfaces,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 1105–1114 (1967). [CrossRef]
  14. R. L. Cook and K. E. Torrance, “A reflectance model for computer graphics,” ACM Trans. Graph. 1, 7–24 (1982). [CrossRef]
  15. K. Nishino and S. Lombardi, “Directional statistics-based reflectance model for isotropic bidirectional reflectance distribution functions,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 28, 8–18 (2011). [CrossRef]
  16. B. G. Hoover and V. L. Gamiz, “Coherence solution for bidirectional reflectance distributions of surfaces with wavelength-scale statistics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 23, 314–328 (2006). [CrossRef]
  17. C. Schlick, “An inexpensive BRDF model for physically-based rendering,” Comput. Graph. Forum 13, 233–246 (1994). [CrossRef]
  18. X. Li, L. Ma, and L. Xu, “Empirical modeling for non-Lambertian reflectance based on full-waveform laser detection,” Opt. Eng. 52, 116110 (2013). [CrossRef]
  19. R. M. Soldado, An Importance Sampling Method for Arbitrary BRDFs Used in Global Illumination Applications (University of Granada, 2008).
  20. F. E. Nicodemus, J. C. Richmond, J. J. Hsia, I. W. Ginsgerb, and T. Limperis, Geometrical Considerations and Nomenclature for Reflectance (National Bureau of Standards, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1977).
  21. C. Schlick, “A survey of shading and reflectance models,” Comput. Graph. Forum 13, 121–131 (1994). [CrossRef]
  22. M. Oren and S. K. Nayar, “Generalization of Lambert’s reflectance model,” in Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (ACM, 1994), pp. 239–246.
  23. A. Kukko, S. Kaasalainen, and P. Litkey, “Effect of incidence angle on laser scanner intensity and surface data,” Appl. Opt. 47, 986–992 (2008). [CrossRef]
  24. J. Qiu, J. Zhang, L. H. Liu, P.-F. Hsu, and L. J. Liu, “Reflective properties of randomly rough surfaces under large incidence angles,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 31, 1251–1258 (2014). [CrossRef]
  25. J. S. Wei, Q. Wang, J. F. Sun, and J. Gao, “Experimental study on object reflection of imaging laser radar,” in Academic International Symposium on Optoelectronics and Microelectronics Technology (IEEE, 2011), pp. 179–182.
  26. A. Pesci and G. Teza, “Effects of surface irregularities on intensity data from laser scanning: an experimental approach,” Ann. Geophys. 51, 839–848 (2008).
  27. P. Beckmann and A. Spizzichino, The Scattering of Electromagnetic Waves from Rough Surface (Artech House, 1987).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited