OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 4, Iss. 9 — Sep. 1, 1987
  • pp: 1814–1819

Hysteresis in human binocular fusion: temporalward and nasalward ranges

Daniel B. Diner and Derek H. Fender  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 4, Issue 9, pp. 1814-1819 (1987)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.4.001814


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (696 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Fender and Julesz [ J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 819 ( 1967)] moved pairs of retinally stabilized images across the temporalward visual fields and found significant differences between the disparities that elicited fusion and the disparities at which fusion was lost. They recognized this phenomenon as an example of hysteresis. In the work reported in this paper, binocular retinally stabilized images of vertical dark bars on white backgrounds were moved into horizontal disparity in both the nasalward and the temporalward directions. The limits of Panum’s fusional area and the hysteresis demonstrated by these limits were measured for two observers. The following results were obtained: (1) the nasalward limits of Panum’s fusional area and the hysteresis demonstrated by the nasalward limits do not differ significantly from the temporalward limits and the hysteresis demonstrated by the temporalward limits; (2) the limits of Panum’s fusional area and the hysteresis demonstrated by these limits are not significantly different if one stimulus moves across each retina or if one stimulus is held still on one retina and the other stimulus is moved across the other retina; (3) the use of nonstabilized cross hairs for fixation decreases the hysteresis; and (4) the full hysteresis effect can be elicited with a rate of change of disparity of 2 arcmin/sec.

© 1987 Optical Society of America

History
Original Manuscript: December 17, 1984
Manuscript Accepted: April 14, 1987
Published: September 1, 1987

Citation
Daniel B. Diner and Derek H. Fender, "Hysteresis in human binocular fusion: temporalward and nasalward ranges," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 1814-1819 (1987)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-4-9-1814


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. C. Wheatstone, “Contributions to the physiology of vision: Part 1. On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision,” Philos. Trans. 128, 371–394 (1838). [CrossRef]
  2. H. W. Dove, “Über Stereoskopie,” Ann. Phys. Ser. 2 110, 494–498 (1860). [CrossRef]
  3. P. L. Panum, Physiologische Untersuchungen über das Sehen mit zwei Augen (Schwerssche Buchhandlung, Kiel, 1858).
  4. D. Fender, B. Julesz, “Extension of Panum’s fusional area in binocularly stabilized vision,”J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 819–830 (1967). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. M. T. Hyson, B. Julesz, D. H. Fender, “Eye movements and neural remapping during fusion of misaligned random-dot stereograms,”J. Opt. Soc. Am. 73, 1665–1673 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. C. J. Erkelens, H. Collewijn, “Eye movements in relation to loss and regaining of fusion of disjunctively moving random-dot stereograms,” Human Neurobiol. 4, 181–188 (1985).
  7. T. P. Piantanida, “Stereo hysteresis revisited,” Vision Res. 26, 431–437 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. A. E. Kertesz, “Effect of stimulus size on fusion and vergence,”J. Opt. Soc. Am. 71, 289–293 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. J. J. Kulikowski, “Limit of single vision in stereopsis depends on contour sharpness,” Nature 276, 126–127 (1978). [CrossRef]
  10. C. Schor, I. Wood, J. Ogawa, “Binocular sensory fusion is limited by spatial resolution,” Vision Res. 24, 661–665 (1984). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. C. M. Schor, C. W. Tyler, “Spatio-temporal properties of Panum’s fusional area,” Vision Res. 21, 683–692 (1981). [CrossRef]
  12. D. S. Gilbert, D. H. Fender, “Contrast thresholds measured with stabilized and non-stabilized sine-wave gratings,” Opt. Acta 16, 191–204 (1969). [CrossRef]
  13. G. J. St-Cyr, D. H. Fender, “Nonlinearities of the human oculomotor system: time delays,” Vision Res. 9, 1491–1503 (1969). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. K. N. Ogle, Researches in Binocular Vision (Hafner, New York, 1950).
  15. A. L. Duwaer, G. van den Brink, “What is the diplopia threshold?” Percept. Psychophys. 29, 295–309 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited