OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 4, Iss. 9 — Sep. 1, 1987
  • pp: 1820–1830

Reading fields of magnifying loupes

Frans J. J. Blommaert and Johan J. Neve  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 4, Issue 9, pp. 1820-1830 (1987)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.4.001820


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1281 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

For the purpose of understanding the influence of the use of magnifying loupes on the reading process, the reading field is a relevant concept. Three possible reading fields are distinguished: the monocular reading field, the binocular reading field, and the composite reading field. Theoretical expressions for the widths of reading fields are derived as a function of the physical parameters of the loupe and the geometry of the reading situation. Variation of reading-field width as a function of magnification is illustrated. For verification, experimentally determined reading-field widths were compared with the theoretical ones. There were small systematic deviations, probably caused by achromatic aberrations. In order to learn about the strategies that subjects use when reading with the aid of a loupe, loupe displacement was measured while subjects read text under conditions that provided a variety of reading-field widths. It was found that individual subjects use different strategies (i.e., they use different reading-field widths).

© 1987 Optical Society of America

History
Original Manuscript: May 23, 1986
Manuscript Accepted: April 1, 1987
Published: September 1, 1987

Citation
Frans J. J. Blommaert and Johan J. Neve, "Reading fields of magnifying loupes," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 1820-1830 (1987)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-4-9-1820


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. A. Linksz, “Optical principles of loupe magnification,” Am. J. Ophthalmol. 40, 831–840 (1955). [PubMed]
  2. J. E. Lebensohn, “Newer optical aids for children with low vision,” Am. J. Ophthalmol. 6, 813–819 (1958).
  3. S. Duke-Elder, D. Abrams, System of Ophthalmology (Kimpton, London, 1970), Vol. 5, pp. 793–807.
  4. L. L. Sloan, Reading Aids for the Partially Sighted: A Systematic Classification and Procedure for Prescribing (Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, Md., 1977).
  5. G. E. Fonda, Management of Low Vision (Thieme-Stratton, New York, 1981).
  6. E. E. Faye, Clinical Low Vision (Little, Brown, Boston, Mass., 1976).
  7. H. Bouma, H. E. M. Mélotte, F. J. J. Blommaert, “On the field width of reading magnifiers,”IPO Ann. Prog. Rep. 19, 133–136 (1984).
  8. F. J. J. Blommaert, J. J. Neve, H. E. M. Mélotte, “Reading magnifiers: variation in magnification, image distance and field width,”IPO Ann. Prog. Rep. 20, 123–130 (1985).
  9. G. Westheimer, “The field of view of visual aids,” Am. J. Optom. 34, 430–438 (1957). [CrossRef]
  10. L. L. Sloan, M. D. Jablonski, “Reading aids for the partially blind,” Arch. Ophthalmol. 62, 465–484 (1959). [CrossRef]
  11. Y. Le Grand, Optique Physiologique (Editions de la Revue d’Optique, Paris, 1952), Vol. 1.
  12. A. L. Duwaer, G. van den Brink, “What is the diplopia threshold?” Percept. Psychophys. 29, 295–309 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. H. Bouma, C. P. Legein, H. E. M. Mélotte, L. Zabel, “Is large print easy to read? Oral reading rate and word recognition of elderly subjects,”IPO Ann. Prog. Rep. 17, 84–90 (1982).
  14. D. H. A. Aberson, “Simulation of poor visual acuity: composition of silent-reading speeds,” submitted to Vision Res.
  15. G. E. Legge, G. S. Rubin, D. G. Pelli, M. M. Schleske, “Psychophysics of reading—II. Low vision,” Vision Res. 25, 253–266 (1985). [CrossRef]
  16. H. Bouma, “Visual reading processes and the quality of text displays,” in Ergonomic Aspects of Visual Display Terminals, E. Grandjean, E. Vigliani, eds. (Taylor and Francis, London, 1980), pp. 101–114.
  17. F. L. van Nes, J. C. Jacobs, “The effect of contrast on letter and word recognition,”IPO Ann. Prog. Rep. 16, 72–80 (1981).
  18. W. T. Welford, Geometrical Optics (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1962), Vol. 1.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited