OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 5, Iss. 8 — Aug. 1, 1988
  • pp: 1328–1338

Fourier spectra of digital halftone images containing dot-position errors

Paul W. Melnychuck and Rodney Shaw  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 5, Issue 8, pp. 1328-1338 (1988)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.5.001328


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1249 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Random laser-writer position errors in raster-scanned monochrome halftone images are examined by using Fourier analysis techniques. For a high-contrast, narrow-exposure latitude recording material (typically used in halftone reproduction) with medium-sized halftone dots (25–85%), a one-dimensional halftone model is developed to derive the signal power spectrum of a halftone image containing position errors in the slow-scan (page-scan) direction. The spectrum of such an image is shown to consist of a periodic component and a random component, which is a function of position error but independent of dot size. The term signal power spectrum, in the context of this paper, is the average squared modulus of the Fourier transform of an image containing these errors. A comparison is made between the percent position-error specification quoted for continuous-tone laser writing and the corresponding specification made in writing digital halftones. For a given absolute position error, the ratio of the resulting percent position error of a single pixel in continuous-tone writing to that for a halftone cell is shown to be roughly 2 ( X / L ), where X is the halftone cell period and L is the pixel size used in continuous-tone reconstruction. Thus, whereas the position-error tolerance for halftone writing is almost an order of magnitude greater than its continuous-tone counterpart on a percent basis, on an absolute scale they are approximately equal. The results can be generalized to include any digitally generated halftone image based on a center-growing dot configuration and containing dot-size/shape distortions.

© 1988 Optical Society of America

Citation
Paul W. Melnychuck and Rodney Shaw, "Fourier spectra of digital halftone images containing dot-position errors," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5, 1328-1338 (1988)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-5-8-1328


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. F. Bestenreiner, U. Geis, J. Helmberger, and K. Stadler, "Visibility and correction of periodic interference structures in line-by-line recorded images," J. Appl. Photogr. Eng. 2, 86–92 (1976).
  2. D. Haas, "Contrast modulation in halftone images produced by variation in scan line spacing," in Proceedings of the SPSE Third International Congress: Advances in Non-Impact Printing Technologies (Society of Photographic Scientists and Engineers, Springfield, Va., 1986), p. 183.
  3. K. Takiguchi, T. Miyagi, A. Okamura, H. Ishoshi, and F. Shibata, "Effect of photoreceptor drum rotational speed variation on laser beam printer halftone reproduction," in Proceedings of the SPSE Third International Congress: Advances in Non-Impact Printing Technologies (Society of Photographic Scientists and Engineers, Springfield, Va., 1986), pp. 168–172.
  4. P. D. Burns, M. Rabbani, and L. A. Ray, "Analysis of image noise due to position errors in laser writers," Appl. Opt. 25, 2158–2168 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. R. Näsänen, "Visibility of halftone dot textures," IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. SMC-14, 1447–1450 (1984). [CrossRef]
  6. D. Kermisch and P. G. Roetling, "Fourier spectrum of halftone images," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 65, 1177 (A) (1975). [CrossRef]
  7. J. P. Allebach and B. Liu, "Random quasiperiodic halftone process," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66, 909–917 (1976). [CrossRef]
  8. S. Bloomberg and P. Engeldrum, "Color error due to pixel placement errors in a dot matrix printer," in Proceedings of the SPSE Third International Congress: Advances in Non-Impact Printing Technologies (Society of Photographic Scientists and Engineers, Springfield, Va., 1986), pp. 257–260.
  9. A. Papoulis, Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1986).
  10. J. Lawson and G. Uhlenbeck, Threshold Signals (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1950), p. 44.
  11. L. E. Franks, "A model for the random video process," Bell Syst. Tech. J. 45, 609–630 (1966).
  12. J. G. Proakis, Digital Communications (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1983), Chap. 3.
  13. W. A. Gardner and L. E. Franks, "Characterization of cyclostationary random signal processes," IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory IT-21, 4–14 (1975). [CrossRef]
  14. W. A. Gardner, "Common pitfalls in the application of stationary process theory to time-sampled and modulated signals," IEEE Trans. Commun. COM-35, 529–534 (1987). [CrossRef]
  15. A. Papoulis, The Fourier Integral and Its Applications (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962), Chap. 12.
  16. P. D. Burns, "Measurement of random and periodic image noise in raster-written images," in Proceedings of the SPSE Second International Congress: Advances in Non-Impact Printing Technologies (Society of Photographic Scientists and Engineers, Springfield, Va., 1984), pp. 139–142.
  17. Y. W. Lee, Statistical Theory of Communication (Wiley, New York, 1960), pp. 60–66.
  18. A. Papoulis, The Fourier Integral and Its Applications (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962), p. 44.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited