OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 7, Iss. 6 — Jun. 1, 1990
  • pp: 1124–1130

Fractal image analysis: application to the topography of Oregon and synthetic images

Jie Huang and Donald L. Turcotte  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 7, Issue 6, pp. 1124-1130 (1990)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.7.001124


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1248 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The Earth’s topography generally obeys fractal statistics; after either one- or two-dimensional Fourier transforms the amplitudes have a power-law dependence on wave number. The slope gives the fractal dimension, and the unit wave-number amplitude is a measure of the roughness. In this study, digitized topography for the state of Oregon (∼7 points/km) has been used to obtain maps of fractal dimension and roughness amplitude. The roughness amplitude correlates well with variations in relief and is a promising parameter for the quantitative classification of landforms. The spatial variations in fractal dimension are low and show no clear correlation with different tectonic settings. For Oregon the mean fractal dimension from a two-dimensional spectral analysis is D = 2.586, and for a one-dimensional spectral analysis the mean fractal dimension is D = 1.487, which is close to the Brown noise value D = 1.5. Synthetic two-dimensional images have also been generated for a range of D values. For D = 2.6, the synthetic image has a mean one-dimensional spectral fractal dimension D = 1.58, which is consistent with our results for Oregon. This approach can be easily applied to any digitized image that obeys fractal statistics.

© 1990 Optical Society of America

History
Original Manuscript: January 2, 1990
Manuscript Accepted: February 12, 1990
Published: June 1, 1990

Citation
Jie Huang and Donald L. Turcotte, "Fractal image analysis: application to the topography of Oregon and synthetic images," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 1124-1130 (1990)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-7-6-1124


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. B. Mandelbrot, “How long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension,” Science 156, 636–638 (1967). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. B. Mandelbrot, The Fractal Geometry of Nature (Freeman, San Francisco, Calif., 1982).
  3. B. Mandelbrot, “Stochastic models for the Earth’s relief, the shape and the fractal dimension of the coastlines, and the number-area rule for islands,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72, 3825–3828 (1975). [CrossRef]
  4. D. L. Turcotte, “Fractals and fragmentation,” J. Geophys. Res. 91, 1921–1926 (1986). [CrossRef]
  5. K. Aki, “A probabilistic synthesis of precursory phenomena,” in Earthquake Prediction, D. W. Simpson, P. G. Richards, eds. (American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., 1981), pp. 566–574.
  6. D. L. Turcotte, “Fractals in geology and geophysics,” Pure Appl. Geophys. 131, 171–196 (1989). [CrossRef]
  7. M. F. Goodchild, “Fractals and the accuracy of geographical measures,” Math. Geol. 12, 85–98 (1980). [CrossRef]
  8. B. Mandelbrot, “Self-affine fractal sets, I: the basic fractal dimensions,” in Fractals in Physics, L. Pietronero, E. Tosatti, eds. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1986), pp. 3–15.
  9. R. F. Voss, “Random fractals: characterization and measurement,” in Scaling Phenomena in Disordered Systems, R. Pynn, A. Skjeltrop, eds. (Plenum, New York, 1985), pp. 1–11.
  10. R. F. Voss, “Random fractal forgeries,” in Fundamental Algorithms for Computer Graphics, Vol. F17 of NATO ASI Series, R. A. Earnshaw, ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985), pp. 805–835. [CrossRef]
  11. C. Cox, H. Sandstrom, “Coupling of internal and surface waves in water of variable depth,” J. Oceanogr. Soc. Jpn. 20, 499–513 (1962).
  12. F. P. Bretherton, “Momentum transport by gravity waves,” Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 95, 213–243 (1969). [CrossRef]
  13. B. A. Warren, “Transpacific hydrographic sections at lats. 43° S and 28° S: the SCORPIO Expedition. II. Deep water,” Deep-Sea Res. 20, 9–38 (1973).
  14. T. H. Bell, “Statistical features of sea-floor topography,” Deep-Sea Res. 22, 883–892 (1975).
  15. T. H. Bell, “Mesoscale sea floor roughness,” Deep-Sea Res. 26A, 65–76 (1979). [CrossRef]
  16. G. I. Barenblatt, A. V. Zhivago, Y. P. Neprochnov, A. A. Ostrovskiy, “The fractal dimension: a quantitative characteristic of ocean-bottom relief,” Oceanology 24, 695–697 (1984).
  17. C. G. Fox, D. E. Hayes, “Quantitative methods for analyzing the roughness of the seafloor,” Rev. Geophys. 23, 1–48 (1985). [CrossRef]
  18. D. Gilbert, V. Courtillot, “Seasat altimetry and the South Atlantic geoid, I. Spectral analysis,” J. Geophys. Res. 92, 6235–6248 (1987). [CrossRef]
  19. G. Balmino, K. Lambeck, W. M. Kaula, “A spherical harmonic analysis of the Earth’s topography,” J. Geophys. Res. 78, 478–481 (1973). [CrossRef]
  20. D. L. Turcotte, “A fractal interpretation of topography and geoid spectra on the Earth, Moon, Venus, and Mars, in Proceedings of the Lunar Planetary Science Conference 17, Part 2, J. Geophys. Res. 92 suppl., E597–E601 (1987).
  21. R. F. Voss, “Fractals in nature: from characterization to simulation,” in The Science of Fractal Images, H. Peitgen, D. Saupe, eds. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1988), pp. 21–70. [CrossRef]
  22. J. Huang, D. L. Turcotte, “Fractal mapping of digitized images: application to the topography of Arizona and comparisons with synthetic images,” J. Geophys. Res. 94, 7491–7495 (1989). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4 Fig. 5
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited