OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Vol. 8, Iss. 11 — Nov. 1, 1991
  • pp: 1762–1774

Image invariance with changes in size: the role of peripheral contrast thresholds

Eli Peli, Jian Yang, and Robert B. Goldstein  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 8, Issue 11, pp. 1762-1774 (1991)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (4202 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



The appearance of objects generally does not change with changes in the size of their retinal image that occur as the distance from the observer increases or decreases. Contrast constancy ensures this invariance for suprathreshold image features, but fully robust size invariance also requires invariance at threshold, so that near-threshold image features do not appear or disappear with distance changes. Since the angular size and the eccentricity of image features covary with distance changes, the threshold requirement for invariance could be satisfied approximately if contrast thresholds were to vary as the product of the spatial frequency and the eccentricity from the fovea. This model fits contrast thresholds for orientation identification over spatial frequencies of 1–16 cycles/deg and for retinal eccentricities of as much as 23 deg. Contrast detection thresholds from six different studies conform to this model over an even wider range of spatial frequencies and retinal eccentricities. The fitting variable, the fundamental eccentricity constant, was similar for all three studies that measured detection along the horizontal meridian and was higher for the orientation identification contrast thresholds along the same meridian. The eccentricity constant from studies that measured detection along the vertical meridian was higher than the constant calculated for the horizontal meridian and lower than the eccentricity constant for chromatic isoluminance gratings. Our model and these results provide new tools for analyzing the visibility of displays and for designing equal-visibility or variable-visibility displays.

© 1991 Optical Society of America

Original Manuscript: October 2, 1990
Revised Manuscript: June 10, 1991
Manuscript Accepted: June 12, 1991
Published: November 1, 1991

Eli Peli, Jian Yang, and Robert B. Goldstein, "Image invariance with changes in size: the role of peripheral contrast thresholds," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 8, 1762-1774 (1991)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. N. S. Sutherland, “Outlines of a theory of visual pattern recognition in animal and man,” Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 171, 297–317 (1968). [CrossRef]
  2. A. P. Ginsburg, “Visual information processing based on spatial filters constrained by biological data,” Ph.D. dissertation (Cambridge University, Cambridge, 1978).
  3. A. Fiorentini, L. Maffei, G. Sandini, “The role of high spatial frequencies in face perception,” Perception 12, 195–201 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. D. H. Parish, G. Sperling, “Object spatial frequencies, retinal spatial frequencies and the efficiency of letter discrimination,” Vision Res. 31, 1399–1415 (1991). [CrossRef]
  5. T. Hayes, M. C. Morrone, D. C. Burr, “Recognition of positive and negative bandpass-filtered images,” Perception 15, 595–602 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. J. Norman, S. Ehrlich, “Spatial frequency filtering and target identification,” Vision Res. 27, 87–96 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. M. A. Georgeson, G. D. Sullivan, “Contrast constancy: deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels,” J. Physiol. 252, 627–656 (1975). [PubMed]
  8. J. J. Kulikowski, “Effective contrast constancy and linearity of contrast sensation,” Vision Res. 16, 1419–1431 (1976). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. R. F. Hess, A. N. Bradley, L. Piotrowski, “Contrast coding in amblyopia. I. Differences in the neural basis of human amblyopia,” Proc. R. Soc. London 127, 309–330 (1983). [CrossRef]
  10. B. R. Stephens, M. S. Banks, “The development of contrast constancy,” J. Exp. Child Psychol. 40, 528–547 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. C. R. Carlson, R. W. Klopfenstein, C. H. Anderson, “Spatially inhomogeneous scaled transforms for vision and pattern recognition,” Opt. Lett. 6, 386–388 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. R. W. Klopfenstein, C. R. Carlson, “Theory of shapeinvariant imaging system,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1, 1040–1053 (1984). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. H. J. Fleck, “Measurement and modeling of peripheral detection and discrimination thresholds,” Biol. Cybern. 61, 437–446 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. K. T. Mullen, “Color vision as a post receptoral specialization of the central visual field,” Vision Res. 31, 119–130 (1991). [CrossRef]
  15. A 5-cycle/deg feature refers to a localized image feature with a spatial spectral mean frequency of 5 cycles/deg, such as a Gabor patch or any other localized luminance patch. Although real image features may have higher frequencies, the contrast at those frequencies will generally be much lower and thus will be subthreshold and inconsequential for our discussion.
  16. M. S. Banks, W. S. Geisler, P. J. Bennett, “The physical limits of grating visibility,” Vision Res. 27, 1915–1924 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. J. S. Pointer, R. F. Hess, “The contrast sensitivity gradient across the human visual field: with emphasis on the low spatial frequency range,” Vision Res. 29, 1133–1151 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. J. G. Robson, N. Graham, “Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field,” Vision Res. 21, 409–418 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. M. W. Cannon, “Perceived contrast in the fovea and periphery,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 1760–1768 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. J. P. Thomas, “Effect of eccentricity on the relationship between detection and identification,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 1599–1605 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. A. M. Derrington, G. B. Henning, “Pattern discrimination with flickering stimuli,” Vision Res. 21, 597–602 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. J. P. Thomas, “Detection and identification: how are they related?”J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 1457–1467 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. H. Strasburger, L. O. Harvey, I. Rentschler, “Contrast threshold for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view.” Percept. Psychophys. (to be published).
  24. E. Peli, R. B. Goldstein, G. M. Young, L. E. Arend, “Contrast sensitivity functions for analysis and simulation of visual perception,” in Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System, Vol. 3 of 1990 OSA Technical Digest Series (Optical Society of America, Washington, D.C., 1990), pp. 126–129.
  25. H. R. Lieberman, A. P. Pentland, “Microcomputer-based estimation of psychophysical thresholds: the best PEST,” Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. 14, 21–25 (1982). [CrossRef]
  26. R. Hilz, C. R. Cavonius, “Functional organization of the peripheral retina: sensitivity to periodic stimuli,” Vision Res. 14, 1333–1337 (1974). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. J. P. Rijsdijk, J. N. Kroon, G. J. van der Wildt, “Contrast sensitivity as a function of position on the retina,” Vision Res. 20, 235–241 (1980). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. D. Regan, K. I. Beverley, “Visual fields described by contrast sensitivity, by acuity, and by relative sensitivity to different orientations.” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 24, 754–759 (1983). [PubMed]
  29. G. T. Timberlake, E. Peli, R. A. Augliere, “Visual acuity measurement with a second-generation scanning laser ophthalmoscope,” in Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System, Vol. 4 of 1987 Technical Digest Series (Optical Society of America, Washington, D.C., 1987), pp. 4–7.
  30. J. M. Woodhouse, H. B. Barlow, “Spatial and temporal resolution and analysis,” in The Senses, H. B. Barlow, J. D. Mollon, eds. (Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, 1982), Chap. 8, pp. 133–164.
  31. M. D. Wilkinson, L. N. Thibos, M. W. Cannon, “Contrast constancy: neural compensation for image attenuation,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. Suppl. 31, 323 (1990).
  32. A. P. Ginsburg, “Is the illusory triangle physical or imaginary?” Nature (London) 257, 291–220 (1975). [CrossRef]
  33. C. W. Tyler, “Is the illusory triangle physical or imaginary?” Perception 6, 603–604 (1977). [PubMed]
  34. E. Peli, “Contrast in complex images,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 2032–2040 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. G. T. Timberlake, E. Peli, E. A. Essock, R. A. Augliere, “Reading with macular scotoma. II. Retinal locus for scanning text,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 28, 1268–1274 (1987). [PubMed]
  36. Y. Yeshurun, E. L. Schwartz, “Shape description with a space-variant sensor: algorithms for scan-path, fusion, and convergence over multiple scans,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 11, 1217–1222 (1989). [CrossRef]
  37. E. L. Schwartz, “Spatial mapping in the primate sensory projection: analytic structure and relevance to perception,” Biol. Cybern. 25, 181–194 (1977). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Y. Y. Zeevi, N. Peterfreund, E. Shlomot, “Pyramidal image representation in nonuniform systems,” in Visual Communications and Image Processing ’88, T. R. Hsing, ed., Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng.1001, 563–571 (1988).
  39. E. L. Schwartz, “Cortical anatomy, size invariance, and spatial frequency analysis,” Perception 10, 455–468 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. P. Cavanagh, “Size invariance: reply to Schwartz,” Perception 10, 469–474 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. I. Rentschler, B. Trentwein, “Loss of spatial phase relationships in extrafoveal vision,” Nature (London) 313, 308–310 (1985). [CrossRef]
  42. C. Braccini, “Scale-invariant image processing by means of scaled transforms or form-invariant, linear shift-variant filters,” Opt. Lett. 8, 392–394 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. J. S. Pointer, R. F. Hess, “The contrast sensitivity gradient across the major oblique meridians of the human visual field,” Vision Res. 30, 497–501 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. C. A. Johnson, J. L. Keltner, F. Balestery, “Effects of target size and eccentricity on visual detection and resolution,” Vision Res. 18, 1217–1222 (1978). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. M. A. Garcia-Perez, “Space-variant visual processing: spatially limited visual channels,” Spatial Vision 3, 129–142 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. S. N. Anstis, “A chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position,” Vision Res. 14, 589–592 (1974). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited